Does Delayed School Entry Reduce Later Grade Retentions and Use of Special Education Services?

The practice of delaying children's entry into a kindergarten program 1 year beyond the traditional chronolgical age of their classmates is a controversial issue. although this practice has been said to reduce the need for grade retentions and special education services, the research literature...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remedial and special education 1995-09, Vol.16 (5), p.288-294
Main Authors: MAY, DEBORAH C., KUNDERT, DEBORAH K., BRENT, DONNA
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Achievement
Age Grade Placement
Education
Factors
Grade Repetition
High Risk Students
Males
Prevention
Primary Education
Referral
School Entrance Age
School readiness
Sex Differences
Special Education
Student Placement
Young children
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The practice of delaying children's entry into a kindergarten program 1 year beyond the traditional chronolgical age of their classmates is a controversial issue. although this practice has been said to reduce the need for grade retentions and special education services, the research literature has yielded contradictory results about the effects of delayed entry on students. the present study examined the effects of delayed entry in one suburban new york school district on later elementaryschool grade retention and special education service rates. in addition, the influence of gender on the practice of delayed entry was investigated. the sample for this study consisted of all students (n = 3,238) who were enrolled in grades 1 through 12; from this, a subsample of all children (n = 279) who had delayed school entry were identified, and their records were examined for future retentions and use of special education services. it was found that students who delayed school entry were most often male and were placed in special education programs in significantly higher proportions than nondelayed-entry students. no significant effect of delayed entry was noted for retention.
ISSN:0741-9325
1538-4756
DOI:10.1177/074193259501600505