Context effects on procedural justice: effects of interrelatedness, trust, and penalty on procedural preferences

Subjects imagined themselves members of different communities and were led to believe that they had been accused of committing an offense of which they knew they were innocent. Interrelatedness, trust, and penalty interacted to affect subjects' ratings of both hearing procedures. (Abstract amen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social justice research 1990-12, Vol.4 (Dec 90), p.337-353
Main Author: Erber, M W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Context
Factors
Litigation
Perceptions
Procedural justice
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 353
container_issue Dec 90
container_start_page 337
container_title Social justice research
container_volume 4
creator Erber, M W
description Subjects imagined themselves members of different communities and were led to believe that they had been accused of committing an offense of which they knew they were innocent. Interrelatedness, trust, and penalty interacted to affect subjects' ratings of both hearing procedures. (Abstract amended)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57720568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57720568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_577205683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzL0KwjAcBPAMCtaPd8jkVCFV2xTXovgA7iWkF2iJacw_AX17OwiCk9MN97ubsUzUdbmTx6pasCXRIEQhhCwy5pvRRTwjhzHQkfjouA-jRpeCsnxIFHuN07c2vJ8GIcCqiM6BKOcxTCznynXcwykbXz83PsAgwGnQms2NsoTNJ1dseznfmutu4o8Eiu29Jw1rlcOYqC2l3Iuyqg9_wzfZOk6D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57720568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Context effects on procedural justice: effects of interrelatedness, trust, and penalty on procedural preferences</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Springer LINK Archives</source><creator>Erber, M W</creator><creatorcontrib>Erber, M W</creatorcontrib><description>Subjects imagined themselves members of different communities and were led to believe that they had been accused of committing an offense of which they knew they were innocent. Interrelatedness, trust, and penalty interacted to affect subjects' ratings of both hearing procedures. (Abstract amended)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-7466</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJREEO</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Context ; Factors ; Litigation ; Perceptions ; Procedural justice</subject><ispartof>Social justice research, 1990-12, Vol.4 (Dec 90), p.337-353</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,31000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erber, M W</creatorcontrib><title>Context effects on procedural justice: effects of interrelatedness, trust, and penalty on procedural preferences</title><title>Social justice research</title><description>Subjects imagined themselves members of different communities and were led to believe that they had been accused of committing an offense of which they knew they were innocent. Interrelatedness, trust, and penalty interacted to affect subjects' ratings of both hearing procedures. (Abstract amended)</description><subject>Context</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Procedural justice</subject><issn>0885-7466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzL0KwjAcBPAMCtaPd8jkVCFV2xTXovgA7iWkF2iJacw_AX17OwiCk9MN97ubsUzUdbmTx6pasCXRIEQhhCwy5pvRRTwjhzHQkfjouA-jRpeCsnxIFHuN07c2vJ8GIcCqiM6BKOcxTCznynXcwykbXz83PsAgwGnQms2NsoTNJ1dseznfmutu4o8Eiu29Jw1rlcOYqC2l3Iuyqg9_wzfZOk6D</recordid><startdate>19901201</startdate><enddate>19901201</enddate><creator>Erber, M W</creator><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901201</creationdate><title>Context effects on procedural justice: effects of interrelatedness, trust, and penalty on procedural preferences</title><author>Erber, M W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_577205683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Context</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Procedural justice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erber, M W</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Social justice research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erber, M W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Context effects on procedural justice: effects of interrelatedness, trust, and penalty on procedural preferences</atitle><jtitle>Social justice research</jtitle><date>1990-12-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>Dec 90</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>337-353</pages><issn>0885-7466</issn><coden>SJREEO</coden><abstract>Subjects imagined themselves members of different communities and were led to believe that they had been accused of committing an offense of which they knew they were innocent. Interrelatedness, trust, and penalty interacted to affect subjects' ratings of both hearing procedures. (Abstract amended)</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-7466
ispartof Social justice research, 1990-12, Vol.4 (Dec 90), p.337-353
issn 0885-7466
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57720568
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Springer LINK Archives
subjects Context
Factors
Litigation
Perceptions
Procedural justice
title Context effects on procedural justice: effects of interrelatedness, trust, and penalty on procedural preferences
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A39%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Context%20effects%20on%20procedural%20justice:%20effects%20of%20interrelatedness,%20trust,%20and%20penalty%20on%20procedural%20preferences&rft.jtitle=Social%20justice%20research&rft.au=Erber,%20M%20W&rft.date=1990-12-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=Dec%2090&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=337-353&rft.issn=0885-7466&rft.coden=SJREEO&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E57720568%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_577205683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57720568&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true