Loading…
Low-Level Masking in the Attentional Blink
If two targets (T1 and T2) are to be identified among other stimuli displayed in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), correct identification of T1 can produce an attentional blink (AB) lasting several hundred milliseconds, during which detection of T2 is impaired. Experiment 1 confirmed that omi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 1997-08, Vol.23 (4), p.1061-1073 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | If two targets (T1 and T2) are to be identified among other stimuli
displayed in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), correct
identification of T1 can produce an attentional blink (AB) lasting
several hundred milliseconds, during which detection of T2 is impaired.
Experiment 1 confirmed that omission of the item directly following T1
(the +1 item) reduces the AB (J. E. Raymond, K. L. Shapiro, & K. M.
Arnell, 1992). The next 3 experiments varied the spatial and temporal
relationships between T1 and the +1 item to study how masking of T1
affects the AB deficit. Perception of T1 was impaired by pattern
masking arising from temporal integration or superimposition of T1 and
the +1 item; it was also impaired by metacontrast masking. We conclude
that masking affects the AB indirectly by degrading T1 thereby
increasing the duration of T1 processing. A 2-stage model proposed by
M. M. Chun and M. C. Potter (1995) is supported. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1061 |