Loading…
Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved
Previous findings have shown that some reactions (e.g. satisfaction with feedback) are guided by self‐enhancement theory, whereas other reactions (e.g. perceived feedback accuracy) have been shown to follow predictions of self‐consistency theory. The Integrative Self‐Schema Model (ISSM) assumes that...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of social psychology 1999-06, Vol.29 (4), p.489-502 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5270-cb738ee0a5cd9a3dffc43694e1bfe74d0448554f2869880cebd8e6dfb45119ad3 |
container_end_page | 502 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 489 |
container_title | European journal of social psychology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Stahlberg, Dagmar Petersen, Lars-Eric Dauenheimer, Dirk |
description | Previous findings have shown that some reactions (e.g. satisfaction with feedback) are guided by self‐enhancement theory, whereas other reactions (e.g. perceived feedback accuracy) have been shown to follow predictions of self‐consistency theory. The Integrative Self‐Schema Model (ISSM) assumes that these effects should be moderated by the elaboration of the self‐schema involved: This assumption was tested in an experimental study: 72 participants received fictitious feedback on different personality dimensions allegedly based on an adjective checklist. This feedback was either consistent with self‐perceptions, more positive than expected, or more negative than expected, and addressed highly elaborated (schematic) or less elaborated (aschematic) personality dimensions. Satisfaction, feedback accuracy and interest in further information were analysed as dependent variables. The experimental results clearly confirmed the hypotheses derived from the ISSM for satisfaction and perceived feedback accuracy. A self‐consistency effect regarding perceived feedback accuracy was found only for feedback on schematic dimensions but was attenuated on aschematic dimensions. A self‐enhancement effect regarding satisfaction was found only on aschematic dimensions. This finding was reversed on schematic dimensions. Finally, interest in further information did not follow the predictions made by the ISSM. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4<489::AID-EJSP940>3.0.CO;2-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57812477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877054340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5270-cb738ee0a5cd9a3dffc43694e1bfe74d0448554f2869880cebd8e6dfb45119ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkW1v0zAUhSMEEmXwHyKB0PYhxW-J7TKBpu6tbFonDTTElyvXuWYZaVLstmP_HoeUIgHSPliWr59zjuyTJO8pGVJC2Jvdq8l4skeJ1llcbJdqrUmxx_RI7AulR6ODyWF29OHqUgvyjg_JcDx9yzL1KBlsNY-TASGiyJiU7GnyLIRbQoguCj5I1pceHXpsLIbUtT41TZni2tQrs6zaJm1dGrB2mcc6TptlWjWRmveXJS6wKavmaxoPyxtMsTaz1m-V3eiXOtgbjBoT1eu2XmP5PHniTB3wxWbfST4dH30cn2bn05PJ-OA8szmTJLMzyRUiMbktteGlc1bwQgukM4dSlEQIlefCMVVopYjFWamwKN1M5JRqU_Kd5HXvu_Dt9xWGJcyrYLGuTYPtKkAuFWVCygdBrqQkPNcRfPkXeNuufBMfAbRjcsEFidR1T1nfhhC_GBa-mht_D5RAVytAVyt0FUFXEfS1AtMgINYKEGuFTa3AgcB4CgxUdH61yTfBmtp509gq_LGXSlCZR-xLj91VNd7_k_5A-P-zf4-iedabV2GJP7bmxn-DQnKZw_XFCZxyffH57IzCMf8JqbvUJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877054340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric ; Dauenheimer, Dirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric ; Dauenheimer, Dirk</creatorcontrib><description>Previous findings have shown that some reactions (e.g. satisfaction with feedback) are guided by self‐enhancement theory, whereas other reactions (e.g. perceived feedback accuracy) have been shown to follow predictions of self‐consistency theory. The Integrative Self‐Schema Model (ISSM) assumes that these effects should be moderated by the elaboration of the self‐schema involved: This assumption was tested in an experimental study: 72 participants received fictitious feedback on different personality dimensions allegedly based on an adjective checklist. This feedback was either consistent with self‐perceptions, more positive than expected, or more negative than expected, and addressed highly elaborated (schematic) or less elaborated (aschematic) personality dimensions. Satisfaction, feedback accuracy and interest in further information were analysed as dependent variables. The experimental results clearly confirmed the hypotheses derived from the ISSM for satisfaction and perceived feedback accuracy. A self‐consistency effect regarding perceived feedback accuracy was found only for feedback on schematic dimensions but was attenuated on aschematic dimensions. A self‐enhancement effect regarding satisfaction was found only on aschematic dimensions. This finding was reversed on schematic dimensions. Finally, interest in further information did not follow the predictions made by the ISSM. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4<489::AID-EJSP940>3.0.CO;2-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Personality ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Role ; Self representation ; Self-concept ; Self-esteem ; Self-perception ; Selfevaluation ; Selfschemata ; Social psychology ; Theories</subject><ispartof>European journal of social psychology, 1999-06, Vol.29 (4), p.489-502</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5270-cb738ee0a5cd9a3dffc43694e1bfe74d0448554f2869880cebd8e6dfb45119ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979,33203</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1784175$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creatorcontrib><title>Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved</title><title>European journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>Previous findings have shown that some reactions (e.g. satisfaction with feedback) are guided by self‐enhancement theory, whereas other reactions (e.g. perceived feedback accuracy) have been shown to follow predictions of self‐consistency theory. The Integrative Self‐Schema Model (ISSM) assumes that these effects should be moderated by the elaboration of the self‐schema involved: This assumption was tested in an experimental study: 72 participants received fictitious feedback on different personality dimensions allegedly based on an adjective checklist. This feedback was either consistent with self‐perceptions, more positive than expected, or more negative than expected, and addressed highly elaborated (schematic) or less elaborated (aschematic) personality dimensions. Satisfaction, feedback accuracy and interest in further information were analysed as dependent variables. The experimental results clearly confirmed the hypotheses derived from the ISSM for satisfaction and perceived feedback accuracy. A self‐consistency effect regarding perceived feedback accuracy was found only for feedback on schematic dimensions but was attenuated on aschematic dimensions. A self‐enhancement effect regarding satisfaction was found only on aschematic dimensions. This finding was reversed on schematic dimensions. Finally, interest in further information did not follow the predictions made by the ISSM. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Self representation</subject><subject>Self-concept</subject><subject>Self-esteem</subject><subject>Self-perception</subject><subject>Selfevaluation</subject><subject>Selfschemata</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Theories</subject><issn>0046-2772</issn><issn>1099-0992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkW1v0zAUhSMEEmXwHyKB0PYhxW-J7TKBpu6tbFonDTTElyvXuWYZaVLstmP_HoeUIgHSPliWr59zjuyTJO8pGVJC2Jvdq8l4skeJ1llcbJdqrUmxx_RI7AulR6ODyWF29OHqUgvyjg_JcDx9yzL1KBlsNY-TASGiyJiU7GnyLIRbQoguCj5I1pceHXpsLIbUtT41TZni2tQrs6zaJm1dGrB2mcc6TptlWjWRmveXJS6wKavmaxoPyxtMsTaz1m-V3eiXOtgbjBoT1eu2XmP5PHniTB3wxWbfST4dH30cn2bn05PJ-OA8szmTJLMzyRUiMbktteGlc1bwQgukM4dSlEQIlefCMVVopYjFWamwKN1M5JRqU_Kd5HXvu_Dt9xWGJcyrYLGuTYPtKkAuFWVCygdBrqQkPNcRfPkXeNuufBMfAbRjcsEFidR1T1nfhhC_GBa-mht_D5RAVytAVyt0FUFXEfS1AtMgINYKEGuFTa3AgcB4CgxUdH61yTfBmtp509gq_LGXSlCZR-xLj91VNd7_k_5A-P-zf4-iedabV2GJP7bmxn-DQnKZw_XFCZxyffH57IzCMf8JqbvUJA</recordid><startdate>199906</startdate><enddate>199906</enddate><creator>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creator><creator>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creator><creator>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199906</creationdate><title>Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved</title><author>Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric ; Dauenheimer, Dirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5270-cb738ee0a5cd9a3dffc43694e1bfe74d0448554f2869880cebd8e6dfb45119ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Self representation</topic><topic>Self-concept</topic><topic>Self-esteem</topic><topic>Self-perception</topic><topic>Selfevaluation</topic><topic>Selfschemata</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stahlberg, Dagmar</au><au>Petersen, Lars-Eric</au><au>Dauenheimer, Dirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>1999-06</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>502</epage><pages>489-502</pages><issn>0046-2772</issn><eissn>1099-0992</eissn><coden>EJSPA6</coden><abstract>Previous findings have shown that some reactions (e.g. satisfaction with feedback) are guided by self‐enhancement theory, whereas other reactions (e.g. perceived feedback accuracy) have been shown to follow predictions of self‐consistency theory. The Integrative Self‐Schema Model (ISSM) assumes that these effects should be moderated by the elaboration of the self‐schema involved: This assumption was tested in an experimental study: 72 participants received fictitious feedback on different personality dimensions allegedly based on an adjective checklist. This feedback was either consistent with self‐perceptions, more positive than expected, or more negative than expected, and addressed highly elaborated (schematic) or less elaborated (aschematic) personality dimensions. Satisfaction, feedback accuracy and interest in further information were analysed as dependent variables. The experimental results clearly confirmed the hypotheses derived from the ISSM for satisfaction and perceived feedback accuracy. A self‐consistency effect regarding perceived feedback accuracy was found only for feedback on schematic dimensions but was attenuated on aschematic dimensions. A self‐enhancement effect regarding satisfaction was found only on aschematic dimensions. This finding was reversed on schematic dimensions. Finally, interest in further information did not follow the predictions made by the ISSM. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4<489::AID-EJSP940>3.0.CO;2-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-2772 |
ispartof | European journal of social psychology, 1999-06, Vol.29 (4), p.489-502 |
issn | 0046-2772 1099-0992 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57812477 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Access to information Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Personality Personality. Affectivity Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Role Self representation Self-concept Self-esteem Self-perception Selfevaluation Selfschemata Social psychology Theories |
title | Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A44%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferences%20for%20and%20evaluation%20of%20self-relevant%20information%20depending%20on%20the%20elaboration%20of%20the%20self-schemata%20involved&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Stahlberg,%20Dagmar&rft.date=1999-06&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=502&rft.pages=489-502&rft.issn=0046-2772&rft.eissn=1099-0992&rft.coden=EJSPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4%3C489::AID-EJSP940%3E3.0.CO;2-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877054340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5270-cb738ee0a5cd9a3dffc43694e1bfe74d0448554f2869880cebd8e6dfb45119ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877054340&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |