Loading…

Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved

Previous findings have shown that some reactions (e.g. satisfaction with feedback) are guided by self‐enhancement theory, whereas other reactions (e.g. perceived feedback accuracy) have been shown to follow predictions of self‐consistency theory. The Integrative Self‐Schema Model (ISSM) assumes that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of social psychology 1999-06, Vol.29 (4), p.489-502
Main Authors: Stahlberg, Dagmar, Petersen, Lars-Eric, Dauenheimer, Dirk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5270-cb738ee0a5cd9a3dffc43694e1bfe74d0448554f2869880cebd8e6dfb45119ad3
container_end_page 502
container_issue 4
container_start_page 489
container_title European journal of social psychology
container_volume 29
creator Stahlberg, Dagmar
Petersen, Lars-Eric
Dauenheimer, Dirk
description Previous findings have shown that some reactions (e.g. satisfaction with feedback) are guided by self‐enhancement theory, whereas other reactions (e.g. perceived feedback accuracy) have been shown to follow predictions of self‐consistency theory. The Integrative Self‐Schema Model (ISSM) assumes that these effects should be moderated by the elaboration of the self‐schema involved: This assumption was tested in an experimental study: 72 participants received fictitious feedback on different personality dimensions allegedly based on an adjective checklist. This feedback was either consistent with self‐perceptions, more positive than expected, or more negative than expected, and addressed highly elaborated (schematic) or less elaborated (aschematic) personality dimensions. Satisfaction, feedback accuracy and interest in further information were analysed as dependent variables. The experimental results clearly confirmed the hypotheses derived from the ISSM for satisfaction and perceived feedback accuracy. A self‐consistency effect regarding perceived feedback accuracy was found only for feedback on schematic dimensions but was attenuated on aschematic dimensions. A self‐enhancement effect regarding satisfaction was found only on aschematic dimensions. This finding was reversed on schematic dimensions. Finally, interest in further information did not follow the predictions made by the ISSM. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4<489::AID-EJSP940>3.0.CO;2-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57812477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877054340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5270-cb738ee0a5cd9a3dffc43694e1bfe74d0448554f2869880cebd8e6dfb45119ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkW1v0zAUhSMEEmXwHyKB0PYhxW-J7TKBpu6tbFonDTTElyvXuWYZaVLstmP_HoeUIgHSPliWr59zjuyTJO8pGVJC2Jvdq8l4skeJ1llcbJdqrUmxx_RI7AulR6ODyWF29OHqUgvyjg_JcDx9yzL1KBlsNY-TASGiyJiU7GnyLIRbQoguCj5I1pceHXpsLIbUtT41TZni2tQrs6zaJm1dGrB2mcc6TptlWjWRmveXJS6wKavmaxoPyxtMsTaz1m-V3eiXOtgbjBoT1eu2XmP5PHniTB3wxWbfST4dH30cn2bn05PJ-OA8szmTJLMzyRUiMbktteGlc1bwQgukM4dSlEQIlefCMVVopYjFWamwKN1M5JRqU_Kd5HXvu_Dt9xWGJcyrYLGuTYPtKkAuFWVCygdBrqQkPNcRfPkXeNuufBMfAbRjcsEFidR1T1nfhhC_GBa-mht_D5RAVytAVyt0FUFXEfS1AtMgINYKEGuFTa3AgcB4CgxUdH61yTfBmtp509gq_LGXSlCZR-xLj91VNd7_k_5A-P-zf4-iedabV2GJP7bmxn-DQnKZw_XFCZxyffH57IzCMf8JqbvUJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877054340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric ; Dauenheimer, Dirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric ; Dauenheimer, Dirk</creatorcontrib><description>Previous findings have shown that some reactions (e.g. satisfaction with feedback) are guided by self‐enhancement theory, whereas other reactions (e.g. perceived feedback accuracy) have been shown to follow predictions of self‐consistency theory. The Integrative Self‐Schema Model (ISSM) assumes that these effects should be moderated by the elaboration of the self‐schema involved: This assumption was tested in an experimental study: 72 participants received fictitious feedback on different personality dimensions allegedly based on an adjective checklist. This feedback was either consistent with self‐perceptions, more positive than expected, or more negative than expected, and addressed highly elaborated (schematic) or less elaborated (aschematic) personality dimensions. Satisfaction, feedback accuracy and interest in further information were analysed as dependent variables. The experimental results clearly confirmed the hypotheses derived from the ISSM for satisfaction and perceived feedback accuracy. A self‐consistency effect regarding perceived feedback accuracy was found only for feedback on schematic dimensions but was attenuated on aschematic dimensions. A self‐enhancement effect regarding satisfaction was found only on aschematic dimensions. This finding was reversed on schematic dimensions. Finally, interest in further information did not follow the predictions made by the ISSM. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4&lt;489::AID-EJSP940&gt;3.0.CO;2-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Personality ; Personality. Affectivity ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Role ; Self representation ; Self-concept ; Self-esteem ; Self-perception ; Selfevaluation ; Selfschemata ; Social psychology ; Theories</subject><ispartof>European journal of social psychology, 1999-06, Vol.29 (4), p.489-502</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5270-cb738ee0a5cd9a3dffc43694e1bfe74d0448554f2869880cebd8e6dfb45119ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979,33203</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1784175$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creatorcontrib><title>Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved</title><title>European journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>Previous findings have shown that some reactions (e.g. satisfaction with feedback) are guided by self‐enhancement theory, whereas other reactions (e.g. perceived feedback accuracy) have been shown to follow predictions of self‐consistency theory. The Integrative Self‐Schema Model (ISSM) assumes that these effects should be moderated by the elaboration of the self‐schema involved: This assumption was tested in an experimental study: 72 participants received fictitious feedback on different personality dimensions allegedly based on an adjective checklist. This feedback was either consistent with self‐perceptions, more positive than expected, or more negative than expected, and addressed highly elaborated (schematic) or less elaborated (aschematic) personality dimensions. Satisfaction, feedback accuracy and interest in further information were analysed as dependent variables. The experimental results clearly confirmed the hypotheses derived from the ISSM for satisfaction and perceived feedback accuracy. A self‐consistency effect regarding perceived feedback accuracy was found only for feedback on schematic dimensions but was attenuated on aschematic dimensions. A self‐enhancement effect regarding satisfaction was found only on aschematic dimensions. This finding was reversed on schematic dimensions. Finally, interest in further information did not follow the predictions made by the ISSM. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Self representation</subject><subject>Self-concept</subject><subject>Self-esteem</subject><subject>Self-perception</subject><subject>Selfevaluation</subject><subject>Selfschemata</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Theories</subject><issn>0046-2772</issn><issn>1099-0992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkW1v0zAUhSMEEmXwHyKB0PYhxW-J7TKBpu6tbFonDTTElyvXuWYZaVLstmP_HoeUIgHSPliWr59zjuyTJO8pGVJC2Jvdq8l4skeJ1llcbJdqrUmxx_RI7AulR6ODyWF29OHqUgvyjg_JcDx9yzL1KBlsNY-TASGiyJiU7GnyLIRbQoguCj5I1pceHXpsLIbUtT41TZni2tQrs6zaJm1dGrB2mcc6TptlWjWRmveXJS6wKavmaxoPyxtMsTaz1m-V3eiXOtgbjBoT1eu2XmP5PHniTB3wxWbfST4dH30cn2bn05PJ-OA8szmTJLMzyRUiMbktteGlc1bwQgukM4dSlEQIlefCMVVopYjFWamwKN1M5JRqU_Kd5HXvu_Dt9xWGJcyrYLGuTYPtKkAuFWVCygdBrqQkPNcRfPkXeNuufBMfAbRjcsEFidR1T1nfhhC_GBa-mht_D5RAVytAVyt0FUFXEfS1AtMgINYKEGuFTa3AgcB4CgxUdH61yTfBmtp509gq_LGXSlCZR-xLj91VNd7_k_5A-P-zf4-iedabV2GJP7bmxn-DQnKZw_XFCZxyffH57IzCMf8JqbvUJA</recordid><startdate>199906</startdate><enddate>199906</enddate><creator>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creator><creator>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creator><creator>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199906</creationdate><title>Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved</title><author>Stahlberg, Dagmar ; Petersen, Lars-Eric ; Dauenheimer, Dirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5270-cb738ee0a5cd9a3dffc43694e1bfe74d0448554f2869880cebd8e6dfb45119ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Self representation</topic><topic>Self-concept</topic><topic>Self-esteem</topic><topic>Self-perception</topic><topic>Selfevaluation</topic><topic>Selfschemata</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stahlberg, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Lars-Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauenheimer, Dirk</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stahlberg, Dagmar</au><au>Petersen, Lars-Eric</au><au>Dauenheimer, Dirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>1999-06</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>502</epage><pages>489-502</pages><issn>0046-2772</issn><eissn>1099-0992</eissn><coden>EJSPA6</coden><abstract>Previous findings have shown that some reactions (e.g. satisfaction with feedback) are guided by self‐enhancement theory, whereas other reactions (e.g. perceived feedback accuracy) have been shown to follow predictions of self‐consistency theory. The Integrative Self‐Schema Model (ISSM) assumes that these effects should be moderated by the elaboration of the self‐schema involved: This assumption was tested in an experimental study: 72 participants received fictitious feedback on different personality dimensions allegedly based on an adjective checklist. This feedback was either consistent with self‐perceptions, more positive than expected, or more negative than expected, and addressed highly elaborated (schematic) or less elaborated (aschematic) personality dimensions. Satisfaction, feedback accuracy and interest in further information were analysed as dependent variables. The experimental results clearly confirmed the hypotheses derived from the ISSM for satisfaction and perceived feedback accuracy. A self‐consistency effect regarding perceived feedback accuracy was found only for feedback on schematic dimensions but was attenuated on aschematic dimensions. A self‐enhancement effect regarding satisfaction was found only on aschematic dimensions. This finding was reversed on schematic dimensions. Finally, interest in further information did not follow the predictions made by the ISSM. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4&lt;489::AID-EJSP940&gt;3.0.CO;2-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-2772
ispartof European journal of social psychology, 1999-06, Vol.29 (4), p.489-502
issn 0046-2772
1099-0992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_57812477
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Access to information
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Personality
Personality. Affectivity
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Role
Self representation
Self-concept
Self-esteem
Self-perception
Selfevaluation
Selfschemata
Social psychology
Theories
title Preferences for and evaluation of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schemata involved
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A44%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferences%20for%20and%20evaluation%20of%20self-relevant%20information%20depending%20on%20the%20elaboration%20of%20the%20self-schemata%20involved&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Stahlberg,%20Dagmar&rft.date=1999-06&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=502&rft.pages=489-502&rft.issn=0046-2772&rft.eissn=1099-0992&rft.coden=EJSPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4%3C489::AID-EJSP940%3E3.0.CO;2-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877054340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5270-cb738ee0a5cd9a3dffc43694e1bfe74d0448554f2869880cebd8e6dfb45119ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877054340&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true