Does Matson matter? Assessing the impact of a UK neighbourhood project

The question of how development agencies should assess their impact has no simple answers and so is often either unasked, or is framed in terms that privilege time-bound and quantitative findings. Describing a council estate neighbourhood project in the UK, the author probes the understandings and p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Development in practice 2000-08, Vol.10 (3-4), p.556-572
Main Author: Thekaekara, Stan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
City councils
Communities
Community associations
Community Development
Community work
Crime
England
Evaluation Research
Gloucestershire
Housing
Impact analysis
Local authority housing estates
Measurement
Neighborhoods
Neighbourhoods
Non-governmental organizations
Nongovernmental Organizations
Oxfam
Poverty
Program Evaluation
Research Methodology
Retirement communities
Social Development
Social Impact Assessment
Socioeconomic development
Tenants
Unemployment
United Kingdom
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The question of how development agencies should assess their impact has no simple answers and so is often either unasked, or is framed in terms that privilege time-bound and quantitative findings. Describing a council estate neighbourhood project in the UK, the author probes the understandings and perceptions of different stakeholders concerning what they believe has changed over the life of the project, and to what they would attribute those changes. The findings suggest that the impact of development interventions is always contingent upon many factors and can only be properly viewed over time; and that many of the most critical factors in shaping change are intangible and have to do with a wide range of social relations and with human motivation and drive, both individual and collective. The author does not present a 'blueprint' for how to conduct impact assessment, but offers some insights into how to frame the questions and interpret the answers.
ISSN:0961-4524
1364-9213
DOI:10.1080/09614520050116712