Retention interval, response competition and word familiarity effects in primed fragment completion

Retention interval is a variable for which functional dissociations between implicit memory tasks have been demonstrated. In Experiments 1A and 1B, the hypothesis was tested that the effect of retention interval on repetition priming depends on whether the test cues are specific to the target items...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of cognitive psychology 1995-06, Vol.7 (2), p.131-143
Main Author: Olofsson, Ulrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-850e714b3a9842fad8f457c81e69f2cbfd6c36c691e1e1a134d01ffca9ed2fec3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-850e714b3a9842fad8f457c81e69f2cbfd6c36c691e1e1a134d01ffca9ed2fec3
container_end_page 143
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title European journal of cognitive psychology
container_volume 7
creator Olofsson, Ulrich
description Retention interval is a variable for which functional dissociations between implicit memory tasks have been demonstrated. In Experiments 1A and 1B, the hypothesis was tested that the effect of retention interval on repetition priming depends on whether the test cues are specific to the target items or not. Subjects were given a word-fragment completion test with fragments that permitted either single or multiple solutions. There was, however, no evidence for differential forgetting for the two types of cues. Experiment 2 gave partial support to the hypothesis that differential forgetting between word completion tasks may instead be due to differences in the base familiarity of the solution words.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09541449508403096
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58325415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>58325415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-850e714b3a9842fad8f457c81e69f2cbfd6c36c691e1e1a134d01ffca9ed2fec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAURYMoOH78AHcFwZXVpEnaFNzI4BcMCKLrkElfJEOb1CSjzL83nXGlSBZZ3Hse7x2Ezgi-Iljga9xyRhhrORYMU9zWe2hGWM1KXFO-j2ZTXuZCfYiOYlxhjFlD8AzpF0jgkvWusC5B-FT9ZREgjt5FKLQfRkh2GyvXFV8-dIVRg-2tCjZtCjAGdIqZLcZgB8hpUO9Dnrhle5jQE3RgVB_h9Oc_Rm_3d6_zx3Lx_PA0v12UmvImlYJjaAhbUtUKVhnVCcN4owWBujWVXpqu1rTWdUsgP0Uo6zAxRqsWuiqvQY_RxW7uGPzHGmKSg40a-l458OsouaBVtsRz8fxXceXXweXdJKnaiggqeJNbZNfSwccYwMjpRBU2kmA5SZd_pGfmZsdYZ3wYVBbWdzKpTe9DNuO0jZL-j38DJlSJOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292183857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retention interval, response competition and word familiarity effects in primed fragment completion</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Behavioral Science Archive 2015</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Olofsson, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Olofsson, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>Retention interval is a variable for which functional dissociations between implicit memory tasks have been demonstrated. In Experiments 1A and 1B, the hypothesis was tested that the effect of retention interval on repetition priming depends on whether the test cues are specific to the target items or not. Subjects were given a word-fragment completion test with fragments that permitted either single or multiple solutions. There was, however, no evidence for differential forgetting for the two types of cues. Experiment 2 gave partial support to the hypothesis that differential forgetting between word completion tasks may instead be due to differences in the base familiarity of the solution words.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-1446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0635</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09541449508403096</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJCPEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hove England: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><ispartof>European journal of cognitive psychology, 1995-06, Vol.7 (2), p.131-143</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1995</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-850e714b3a9842fad8f457c81e69f2cbfd6c36c691e1e1a134d01ffca9ed2fec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-850e714b3a9842fad8f457c81e69f2cbfd6c36c691e1e1a134d01ffca9ed2fec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09541449508403096$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09541449508403096$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31247,59752,60541</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olofsson, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Retention interval, response competition and word familiarity effects in primed fragment completion</title><title>European journal of cognitive psychology</title><description>Retention interval is a variable for which functional dissociations between implicit memory tasks have been demonstrated. In Experiments 1A and 1B, the hypothesis was tested that the effect of retention interval on repetition priming depends on whether the test cues are specific to the target items or not. Subjects were given a word-fragment completion test with fragments that permitted either single or multiple solutions. There was, however, no evidence for differential forgetting for the two types of cues. Experiment 2 gave partial support to the hypothesis that differential forgetting between word completion tasks may instead be due to differences in the base familiarity of the solution words.</description><issn>0954-1446</issn><issn>1464-0635</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAURYMoOH78AHcFwZXVpEnaFNzI4BcMCKLrkElfJEOb1CSjzL83nXGlSBZZ3Hse7x2Ezgi-Iljga9xyRhhrORYMU9zWe2hGWM1KXFO-j2ZTXuZCfYiOYlxhjFlD8AzpF0jgkvWusC5B-FT9ZREgjt5FKLQfRkh2GyvXFV8-dIVRg-2tCjZtCjAGdIqZLcZgB8hpUO9Dnrhle5jQE3RgVB_h9Oc_Rm_3d6_zx3Lx_PA0v12UmvImlYJjaAhbUtUKVhnVCcN4owWBujWVXpqu1rTWdUsgP0Uo6zAxRqsWuiqvQY_RxW7uGPzHGmKSg40a-l458OsouaBVtsRz8fxXceXXweXdJKnaiggqeJNbZNfSwccYwMjpRBU2kmA5SZd_pGfmZsdYZ3wYVBbWdzKpTe9DNuO0jZL-j38DJlSJOQ</recordid><startdate>19950601</startdate><enddate>19950601</enddate><creator>Olofsson, Ulrich</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Published for the European Society for Cognitive Psychology by L. Erlbaum Associates</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950601</creationdate><title>Retention interval, response competition and word familiarity effects in primed fragment completion</title><author>Olofsson, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-850e714b3a9842fad8f457c81e69f2cbfd6c36c691e1e1a134d01ffca9ed2fec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olofsson, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>European journal of cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olofsson, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retention interval, response competition and word familiarity effects in primed fragment completion</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cognitive psychology</jtitle><date>1995-06-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>131-143</pages><issn>0954-1446</issn><eissn>1464-0635</eissn><coden>EJCPEW</coden><abstract>Retention interval is a variable for which functional dissociations between implicit memory tasks have been demonstrated. In Experiments 1A and 1B, the hypothesis was tested that the effect of retention interval on repetition priming depends on whether the test cues are specific to the target items or not. Subjects were given a word-fragment completion test with fragments that permitted either single or multiple solutions. There was, however, no evidence for differential forgetting for the two types of cues. Experiment 2 gave partial support to the hypothesis that differential forgetting between word completion tasks may instead be due to differences in the base familiarity of the solution words.</abstract><cop>Hove England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/09541449508403096</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-1446
ispartof European journal of cognitive psychology, 1995-06, Vol.7 (2), p.131-143
issn 0954-1446
1464-0635
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58325415
source Taylor & Francis Behavioral Science Archive 2015; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
title Retention interval, response competition and word familiarity effects in primed fragment completion
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A11%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retention%20interval,%20response%20competition%20and%20word%20familiarity%20effects%20in%20primed%20fragment%20completion&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Olofsson,%20Ulrich&rft.date=1995-06-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=131-143&rft.issn=0954-1446&rft.eissn=1464-0635&rft.coden=EJCPEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09541449508403096&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58325415%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-850e714b3a9842fad8f457c81e69f2cbfd6c36c691e1e1a134d01ffca9ed2fec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292183857&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true