Loading…

Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks

Networking between companies and other regional key actors has grown into a widespread instrument for economic development since the 1990s. Participatory networks have formed the concept for many activities of Local Agenda 21. Simultaneously, economic geography has focused on network theories to exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geoforum 2008, Vol.39 (1), p.32-47
Main Author: Stoermer, Eckhard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 32
container_title Geoforum
container_volume 39
creator Stoermer, Eckhard
description Networking between companies and other regional key actors has grown into a widespread instrument for economic development since the 1990s. Participatory networks have formed the concept for many activities of Local Agenda 21. Simultaneously, economic geography has focused on network theories to explain innovation in and the economic success of regions. This article focuses on the reasons why individual actors participate in environmentally oriented information networks. The questions approached are: Does the concept of learning within networks influence a firm’s development? How do the participants interact with each other? What effects do the networks have on their environment (arenas)? The changing arenas of a firm are analysed with regard to environmental concerns. These changes need to be anticipated for reliable strategies. To gain information and knowledge about current behaviour and activities, the functions of networks as learning platforms are discussed. Drawing upon arguments from different network theories, the motivations of participating in a network are threefold: actor and firm oriented, network internal (inter-firm), and network external. From these, a generic target cube of network motivations and actions is set up. The concept is reviewed by examining 12 ‘regional environmental information-oriented corporation networks’ (RUN) in the Greater Munich Area. The empirical material reveals that this type of network does not provide a guarantee for significant improvements in a firm’s environmental behaviour. However, participants learn about best practices while pursuing explicit or implicit aims as to influence their arenas.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58771955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718506002181</els_id><sourcerecordid>58771955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9q3DAQxkVpoNskrxB06s2uJFt_fGsJbRoI5JKQo9COxhttbcmVvCm55R3yhnmSeNn2vDAwMPN938D8CLngrOaMq6_beoOpT3k31oIxVXNRM8Y_kBU3WlRd05mPZLVMVKW5kZ_I51K2jDHdmG5F_FVGjCFuqCu0zNnNuAlAPT7hkKYR40xDXMrvlmVwA4VHFzdI315e6cPjM4U0Ti4GLHRyeQ4QpiVhb0FIVcT5b8q_yxk56d1Q8PxfPyX3P3_cXf6qbm6vri-_31TQMjlXRqEEb6RoAYzGHhrjZeOhXzOhesY7te6FbrXwKITU2Gqv-wa1W0PHUTXNKflyyJ1y-rPDMtsxFMBhcBHTrlhptOadlEeFjdKLVPCjQt61Qhm2P60OQsiplIy9nXIYXX62nNk9Jru1_zHZPSbLhV2gLMZvByMuj3kKmG2BgBHQh4wwW5_CsYh3t-Sh3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19426803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Stoermer, Eckhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Stoermer, Eckhard</creatorcontrib><description>Networking between companies and other regional key actors has grown into a widespread instrument for economic development since the 1990s. Participatory networks have formed the concept for many activities of Local Agenda 21. Simultaneously, economic geography has focused on network theories to explain innovation in and the economic success of regions. This article focuses on the reasons why individual actors participate in environmentally oriented information networks. The questions approached are: Does the concept of learning within networks influence a firm’s development? How do the participants interact with each other? What effects do the networks have on their environment (arenas)? The changing arenas of a firm are analysed with regard to environmental concerns. These changes need to be anticipated for reliable strategies. To gain information and knowledge about current behaviour and activities, the functions of networks as learning platforms are discussed. Drawing upon arguments from different network theories, the motivations of participating in a network are threefold: actor and firm oriented, network internal (inter-firm), and network external. From these, a generic target cube of network motivations and actions is set up. The concept is reviewed by examining 12 ‘regional environmental information-oriented corporation networks’ (RUN) in the Greater Munich Area. The empirical material reveals that this type of network does not provide a guarantee for significant improvements in a firm’s environmental behaviour. However, participants learn about best practices while pursuing explicit or implicit aims as to influence their arenas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GFRMAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Arena ; Eco-networks ; Ecology ; Economic geography ; Environmentalism ; Germany ; Greening of industry ; Innovation ; Innovation in business ; Innovation system ; Munich ; Munich (Germany) ; Networks ; Social responsibility of business ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2008, Vol.39 (1), p.32-47</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27846,27904,27905,27906,33205</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stoermer, Eckhard</creatorcontrib><title>Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>Networking between companies and other regional key actors has grown into a widespread instrument for economic development since the 1990s. Participatory networks have formed the concept for many activities of Local Agenda 21. Simultaneously, economic geography has focused on network theories to explain innovation in and the economic success of regions. This article focuses on the reasons why individual actors participate in environmentally oriented information networks. The questions approached are: Does the concept of learning within networks influence a firm’s development? How do the participants interact with each other? What effects do the networks have on their environment (arenas)? The changing arenas of a firm are analysed with regard to environmental concerns. These changes need to be anticipated for reliable strategies. To gain information and knowledge about current behaviour and activities, the functions of networks as learning platforms are discussed. Drawing upon arguments from different network theories, the motivations of participating in a network are threefold: actor and firm oriented, network internal (inter-firm), and network external. From these, a generic target cube of network motivations and actions is set up. The concept is reviewed by examining 12 ‘regional environmental information-oriented corporation networks’ (RUN) in the Greater Munich Area. The empirical material reveals that this type of network does not provide a guarantee for significant improvements in a firm’s environmental behaviour. However, participants learn about best practices while pursuing explicit or implicit aims as to influence their arenas.</description><subject>Arena</subject><subject>Eco-networks</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic geography</subject><subject>Environmentalism</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Greening of industry</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovation in business</subject><subject>Innovation system</subject><subject>Munich</subject><subject>Munich (Germany)</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Social responsibility of business</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9q3DAQxkVpoNskrxB06s2uJFt_fGsJbRoI5JKQo9COxhttbcmVvCm55R3yhnmSeNn2vDAwMPN938D8CLngrOaMq6_beoOpT3k31oIxVXNRM8Y_kBU3WlRd05mPZLVMVKW5kZ_I51K2jDHdmG5F_FVGjCFuqCu0zNnNuAlAPT7hkKYR40xDXMrvlmVwA4VHFzdI315e6cPjM4U0Ti4GLHRyeQ4QpiVhb0FIVcT5b8q_yxk56d1Q8PxfPyX3P3_cXf6qbm6vri-_31TQMjlXRqEEb6RoAYzGHhrjZeOhXzOhesY7te6FbrXwKITU2Gqv-wa1W0PHUTXNKflyyJ1y-rPDMtsxFMBhcBHTrlhptOadlEeFjdKLVPCjQt61Qhm2P60OQsiplIy9nXIYXX62nNk9Jru1_zHZPSbLhV2gLMZvByMuj3kKmG2BgBHQh4wwW5_CsYh3t-Sh3w</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Stoermer, Eckhard</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks</title><author>Stoermer, Eckhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Arena</topic><topic>Eco-networks</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic geography</topic><topic>Environmentalism</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Greening of industry</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovation in business</topic><topic>Innovation system</topic><topic>Munich</topic><topic>Munich (Germany)</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Social responsibility of business</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stoermer, Eckhard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stoermer, Eckhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>32-47</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><coden>GFRMAK</coden><abstract>Networking between companies and other regional key actors has grown into a widespread instrument for economic development since the 1990s. Participatory networks have formed the concept for many activities of Local Agenda 21. Simultaneously, economic geography has focused on network theories to explain innovation in and the economic success of regions. This article focuses on the reasons why individual actors participate in environmentally oriented information networks. The questions approached are: Does the concept of learning within networks influence a firm’s development? How do the participants interact with each other? What effects do the networks have on their environment (arenas)? The changing arenas of a firm are analysed with regard to environmental concerns. These changes need to be anticipated for reliable strategies. To gain information and knowledge about current behaviour and activities, the functions of networks as learning platforms are discussed. Drawing upon arguments from different network theories, the motivations of participating in a network are threefold: actor and firm oriented, network internal (inter-firm), and network external. From these, a generic target cube of network motivations and actions is set up. The concept is reviewed by examining 12 ‘regional environmental information-oriented corporation networks’ (RUN) in the Greater Munich Area. The empirical material reveals that this type of network does not provide a guarantee for significant improvements in a firm’s environmental behaviour. However, participants learn about best practices while pursuing explicit or implicit aims as to influence their arenas.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.001</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7185
ispartof Geoforum, 2008, Vol.39 (1), p.32-47
issn 0016-7185
1872-9398
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58771955
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Arena
Eco-networks
Ecology
Economic geography
Environmentalism
Germany
Greening of industry
Innovation
Innovation in business
Innovation system
Munich
Munich (Germany)
Networks
Social responsibility of business
Sustainable development
title Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A44%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Greening%20as%20strategic%20development%20in%20industrial%20change%20%E2%80%93%20Why%20companies%20participate%20in%20eco-networks&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Stoermer,%20Eckhard&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=32-47&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft.coden=GFRMAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58771955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19426803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true