Loading…
Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks
Networking between companies and other regional key actors has grown into a widespread instrument for economic development since the 1990s. Participatory networks have formed the concept for many activities of Local Agenda 21. Simultaneously, economic geography has focused on network theories to exp...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geoforum 2008, Vol.39 (1), p.32-47 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633 |
container_end_page | 47 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | Geoforum |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Stoermer, Eckhard |
description | Networking between companies and other regional key actors has grown into a widespread instrument for economic development since the 1990s. Participatory networks have formed the concept for many activities of Local Agenda 21. Simultaneously, economic geography has focused on network theories to explain innovation in and the economic success of regions.
This article focuses on the reasons why individual actors participate in environmentally oriented information networks. The questions approached are: Does the concept of learning within networks influence a firm’s development? How do the participants interact with each other? What effects do the networks have on their environment (arenas)?
The changing arenas of a firm are analysed with regard to environmental concerns. These changes need to be anticipated for reliable strategies. To gain information and knowledge about current behaviour and activities, the functions of networks as learning platforms are discussed. Drawing upon arguments from different network theories, the motivations of participating in a network are threefold: actor and firm oriented, network internal (inter-firm), and network external. From these, a generic target cube of network motivations and actions is set up.
The concept is reviewed by examining 12 ‘regional environmental information-oriented corporation networks’ (RUN) in the Greater Munich Area. The empirical material reveals that this type of network does not provide a guarantee for significant improvements in a firm’s environmental behaviour. However, participants learn about best practices while pursuing explicit or implicit aims as to influence their arenas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58771955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016718506002181</els_id><sourcerecordid>58771955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9q3DAQxkVpoNskrxB06s2uJFt_fGsJbRoI5JKQo9COxhttbcmVvCm55R3yhnmSeNn2vDAwMPN938D8CLngrOaMq6_beoOpT3k31oIxVXNRM8Y_kBU3WlRd05mPZLVMVKW5kZ_I51K2jDHdmG5F_FVGjCFuqCu0zNnNuAlAPT7hkKYR40xDXMrvlmVwA4VHFzdI315e6cPjM4U0Ti4GLHRyeQ4QpiVhb0FIVcT5b8q_yxk56d1Q8PxfPyX3P3_cXf6qbm6vri-_31TQMjlXRqEEb6RoAYzGHhrjZeOhXzOhesY7te6FbrXwKITU2Gqv-wa1W0PHUTXNKflyyJ1y-rPDMtsxFMBhcBHTrlhptOadlEeFjdKLVPCjQt61Qhm2P60OQsiplIy9nXIYXX62nNk9Jru1_zHZPSbLhV2gLMZvByMuj3kKmG2BgBHQh4wwW5_CsYh3t-Sh3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19426803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Stoermer, Eckhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Stoermer, Eckhard</creatorcontrib><description>Networking between companies and other regional key actors has grown into a widespread instrument for economic development since the 1990s. Participatory networks have formed the concept for many activities of Local Agenda 21. Simultaneously, economic geography has focused on network theories to explain innovation in and the economic success of regions.
This article focuses on the reasons why individual actors participate in environmentally oriented information networks. The questions approached are: Does the concept of learning within networks influence a firm’s development? How do the participants interact with each other? What effects do the networks have on their environment (arenas)?
The changing arenas of a firm are analysed with regard to environmental concerns. These changes need to be anticipated for reliable strategies. To gain information and knowledge about current behaviour and activities, the functions of networks as learning platforms are discussed. Drawing upon arguments from different network theories, the motivations of participating in a network are threefold: actor and firm oriented, network internal (inter-firm), and network external. From these, a generic target cube of network motivations and actions is set up.
The concept is reviewed by examining 12 ‘regional environmental information-oriented corporation networks’ (RUN) in the Greater Munich Area. The empirical material reveals that this type of network does not provide a guarantee for significant improvements in a firm’s environmental behaviour. However, participants learn about best practices while pursuing explicit or implicit aims as to influence their arenas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GFRMAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Arena ; Eco-networks ; Ecology ; Economic geography ; Environmentalism ; Germany ; Greening of industry ; Innovation ; Innovation in business ; Innovation system ; Munich ; Munich (Germany) ; Networks ; Social responsibility of business ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Geoforum, 2008, Vol.39 (1), p.32-47</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27846,27904,27905,27906,33205</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stoermer, Eckhard</creatorcontrib><title>Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks</title><title>Geoforum</title><description>Networking between companies and other regional key actors has grown into a widespread instrument for economic development since the 1990s. Participatory networks have formed the concept for many activities of Local Agenda 21. Simultaneously, economic geography has focused on network theories to explain innovation in and the economic success of regions.
This article focuses on the reasons why individual actors participate in environmentally oriented information networks. The questions approached are: Does the concept of learning within networks influence a firm’s development? How do the participants interact with each other? What effects do the networks have on their environment (arenas)?
The changing arenas of a firm are analysed with regard to environmental concerns. These changes need to be anticipated for reliable strategies. To gain information and knowledge about current behaviour and activities, the functions of networks as learning platforms are discussed. Drawing upon arguments from different network theories, the motivations of participating in a network are threefold: actor and firm oriented, network internal (inter-firm), and network external. From these, a generic target cube of network motivations and actions is set up.
The concept is reviewed by examining 12 ‘regional environmental information-oriented corporation networks’ (RUN) in the Greater Munich Area. The empirical material reveals that this type of network does not provide a guarantee for significant improvements in a firm’s environmental behaviour. However, participants learn about best practices while pursuing explicit or implicit aims as to influence their arenas.</description><subject>Arena</subject><subject>Eco-networks</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic geography</subject><subject>Environmentalism</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Greening of industry</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovation in business</subject><subject>Innovation system</subject><subject>Munich</subject><subject>Munich (Germany)</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Social responsibility of business</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0016-7185</issn><issn>1872-9398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9q3DAQxkVpoNskrxB06s2uJFt_fGsJbRoI5JKQo9COxhttbcmVvCm55R3yhnmSeNn2vDAwMPN938D8CLngrOaMq6_beoOpT3k31oIxVXNRM8Y_kBU3WlRd05mPZLVMVKW5kZ_I51K2jDHdmG5F_FVGjCFuqCu0zNnNuAlAPT7hkKYR40xDXMrvlmVwA4VHFzdI315e6cPjM4U0Ti4GLHRyeQ4QpiVhb0FIVcT5b8q_yxk56d1Q8PxfPyX3P3_cXf6qbm6vri-_31TQMjlXRqEEb6RoAYzGHhrjZeOhXzOhesY7te6FbrXwKITU2Gqv-wa1W0PHUTXNKflyyJ1y-rPDMtsxFMBhcBHTrlhptOadlEeFjdKLVPCjQt61Qhm2P60OQsiplIy9nXIYXX62nNk9Jru1_zHZPSbLhV2gLMZvByMuj3kKmG2BgBHQh4wwW5_CsYh3t-Sh3w</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Stoermer, Eckhard</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks</title><author>Stoermer, Eckhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Arena</topic><topic>Eco-networks</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic geography</topic><topic>Environmentalism</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Greening of industry</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovation in business</topic><topic>Innovation system</topic><topic>Munich</topic><topic>Munich (Germany)</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Social responsibility of business</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stoermer, Eckhard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stoermer, Eckhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks</atitle><jtitle>Geoforum</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>32-47</pages><issn>0016-7185</issn><eissn>1872-9398</eissn><coden>GFRMAK</coden><abstract>Networking between companies and other regional key actors has grown into a widespread instrument for economic development since the 1990s. Participatory networks have formed the concept for many activities of Local Agenda 21. Simultaneously, economic geography has focused on network theories to explain innovation in and the economic success of regions.
This article focuses on the reasons why individual actors participate in environmentally oriented information networks. The questions approached are: Does the concept of learning within networks influence a firm’s development? How do the participants interact with each other? What effects do the networks have on their environment (arenas)?
The changing arenas of a firm are analysed with regard to environmental concerns. These changes need to be anticipated for reliable strategies. To gain information and knowledge about current behaviour and activities, the functions of networks as learning platforms are discussed. Drawing upon arguments from different network theories, the motivations of participating in a network are threefold: actor and firm oriented, network internal (inter-firm), and network external. From these, a generic target cube of network motivations and actions is set up.
The concept is reviewed by examining 12 ‘regional environmental information-oriented corporation networks’ (RUN) in the Greater Munich Area. The empirical material reveals that this type of network does not provide a guarantee for significant improvements in a firm’s environmental behaviour. However, participants learn about best practices while pursuing explicit or implicit aims as to influence their arenas.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.001</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-7185 |
ispartof | Geoforum, 2008, Vol.39 (1), p.32-47 |
issn | 0016-7185 1872-9398 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_58771955 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; PAIS Index |
subjects | Arena Eco-networks Ecology Economic geography Environmentalism Germany Greening of industry Innovation Innovation in business Innovation system Munich Munich (Germany) Networks Social responsibility of business Sustainable development |
title | Greening as strategic development in industrial change – Why companies participate in eco-networks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A44%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Greening%20as%20strategic%20development%20in%20industrial%20change%20%E2%80%93%20Why%20companies%20participate%20in%20eco-networks&rft.jtitle=Geoforum&rft.au=Stoermer,%20Eckhard&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=32-47&rft.issn=0016-7185&rft.eissn=1872-9398&rft.coden=GFRMAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58771955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-86e5cd8524cc87efc38d53dcfb026f0196bf27472de2257e47d7f3e7abc91e633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19426803&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |