Political Development and Military Intervention in Latin America

• Published in: The American political science review 1966-09, Vol.60 (3), p.616-626
• Main Author: Needler, Martin C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Armed forces; Army and politics; Civil-military relations; Coup detat; Economic conditions; Government and politics; Juntas; Latin America; Latin American politics; Military intervention; Political attitudes; Political parties; Presidential elections; Revolution; Voting
• ISSN: 0003-0554; 1537-5943
• DOI: 10.2307/1952974

It is noteworthy that the recent spate of writings in the field of “political development” has shown a pronounced tendency to omit consideration of Latin America. Thus the “communications” and “bureaucracy” volumes in the SSRC political development series are totally innocent of Latin American data, as is an excellent recent treatment of—of all things!—the political behavior of the military in developing areas. The Latin Americanists, for their part, have largely stressed those key features of the area's politics which have long remained constant—executive predominance, military intervention, and the influence of the peculiarities of Hispanic culture. At the same time, it is clear that the social changes usually collectively termed “modernization”—urbanization, technological borrowing, and the development of mass communications grids—together with their political correlate, the expansion of the political community to include hitherto excluded social elements, are proceeding in Latin America too. Accordingly, it becomes desirable to reexamine the “statics” of Latin American politics in the light of the “dynamics” of the processes of political development and social mobilization. The present article attempts this reexamination with respect to the most characteristic feature of Latin American politics, the coup d'état and the establishment of a de facto military government. A priori, mutually contradictory theses about the relations of the military coup to social development can be constructed—and indeed the literature on the subject abounds in such contradictory theses, evidence to support each of which is always available.