Loading…
Public Perceptions of the Ideal Number of Children for Contemporary Families
Demographic and family dynamics have been influenced by the recent downturn in average family size. This research examines perceptions of the ideal size for contemporary families and beliefs regarding factors which have contributed to families' decisions to have fewer children. Findings reveal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Population and environment 1987-09, Vol.9 (3), p.160-172 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-73e537e5f068e166765bb95b8bc83099ccb3e0db62e0807674769d7ebbef99273 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-73e537e5f068e166765bb95b8bc83099ccb3e0db62e0807674769d7ebbef99273 |
container_end_page | 172 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 160 |
container_title | Population and environment |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | West, Kirsten K. Morgan, Leslie A. |
description | Demographic and family dynamics have been influenced by the recent downturn in average family size. This research examines perceptions of the ideal size for contemporary families and beliefs regarding factors which have contributed to families' decisions to have fewer children. Findings reveal that the two child family is the overwhelming standard chosen by respondents, and that this preference holds for virtually all demographic categories. Three of five reasons offered for smaller families today (expense of children, wives working and better birth control) were viewed as important by over 85% of those sampled. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01259306 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59479525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27503074</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27503074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-73e537e5f068e166765bb95b8bc83099ccb3e0db62e0807674769d7ebbef99273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LxDAQBuAgCq4fF-9CQPAgVCdJkzRHLa4uLLoHPZcmnbJd2mZN2oP_3i4rCl48DQwPLzMvIRcMbhmAvnuYA-PSCFAHZMakFonOGBySGTBjEgBhjslJjBsAUJngM7JcjbZtHF1hcLgdGt9H6ms6rJEuKixb-jJ2FsNul6-btgrY09oHmvt-wG7rQxk-6bzsmrbBeEaO6rKNeP49T8n7_PEtf06Wr0-L_H6ZOJGKIdECpdAo6-kGZEppJa010mbWZQKMcc4KhMoqjpCBVjrVylQarcXaGK7FKbne526D_xgxDkXXRIdtW_box1hIk2ojufwXspRzqTM1was_cOPH0E9PFEyAZhmkICZ1s1cu-BgD1sU2NN3UQMGg2PVf_PY_4cs93sTBhx_JtYQpMRVfptd_AQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307180403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public Perceptions of the Ideal Number of Children for Contemporary Families</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Springer LINK Archives</source><creator>West, Kirsten K. ; Morgan, Leslie A.</creator><creatorcontrib>West, Kirsten K. ; Morgan, Leslie A.</creatorcontrib><description>Demographic and family dynamics have been influenced by the recent downturn in average family size. This research examines perceptions of the ideal size for contemporary families and beliefs regarding factors which have contributed to families' decisions to have fewer children. Findings reveal that the two child family is the overwhelming standard chosen by respondents, and that this preference holds for virtually all demographic categories. Three of five reasons offered for smaller families today (expense of children, wives working and better birth control) were viewed as important by over 85% of those sampled.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0199-0039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01259306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Human Sciences Press</publisher><subject>Birth control ; Childlessness ; Children ; Demography ; Family ; Family size ; Female fertility ; Fertility ; Ideal numbers ; Marital status ; Normativity ; Size ; United States</subject><ispartof>Population and environment, 1987-09, Vol.9 (3), p.160-172</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 Human Sciences Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-73e537e5f068e166765bb95b8bc83099ccb3e0db62e0807674769d7ebbef99273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-73e537e5f068e166765bb95b8bc83099ccb3e0db62e0807674769d7ebbef99273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27503074$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27503074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27842,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>West, Kirsten K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Leslie A.</creatorcontrib><title>Public Perceptions of the Ideal Number of Children for Contemporary Families</title><title>Population and environment</title><description>Demographic and family dynamics have been influenced by the recent downturn in average family size. This research examines perceptions of the ideal size for contemporary families and beliefs regarding factors which have contributed to families' decisions to have fewer children. Findings reveal that the two child family is the overwhelming standard chosen by respondents, and that this preference holds for virtually all demographic categories. Three of five reasons offered for smaller families today (expense of children, wives working and better birth control) were viewed as important by over 85% of those sampled.</description><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Childlessness</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family size</subject><subject>Female fertility</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Ideal numbers</subject><subject>Marital status</subject><subject>Normativity</subject><subject>Size</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0199-0039</issn><issn>1573-7810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LxDAQBuAgCq4fF-9CQPAgVCdJkzRHLa4uLLoHPZcmnbJd2mZN2oP_3i4rCl48DQwPLzMvIRcMbhmAvnuYA-PSCFAHZMakFonOGBySGTBjEgBhjslJjBsAUJngM7JcjbZtHF1hcLgdGt9H6ms6rJEuKixb-jJ2FsNul6-btgrY09oHmvt-wG7rQxk-6bzsmrbBeEaO6rKNeP49T8n7_PEtf06Wr0-L_H6ZOJGKIdECpdAo6-kGZEppJa010mbWZQKMcc4KhMoqjpCBVjrVylQarcXaGK7FKbne526D_xgxDkXXRIdtW_box1hIk2ojufwXspRzqTM1was_cOPH0E9PFEyAZhmkICZ1s1cu-BgD1sU2NN3UQMGg2PVf_PY_4cs93sTBhx_JtYQpMRVfptd_AQ</recordid><startdate>19870901</startdate><enddate>19870901</enddate><creator>West, Kirsten K.</creator><creator>Morgan, Leslie A.</creator><general>Human Sciences Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>AKNXY</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JWXEY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P2</scope><scope>~P3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870901</creationdate><title>Public Perceptions of the Ideal Number of Children for Contemporary Families</title><author>West, Kirsten K. ; Morgan, Leslie A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-73e537e5f068e166765bb95b8bc83099ccb3e0db62e0807674769d7ebbef99273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Childlessness</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family size</topic><topic>Female fertility</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Ideal numbers</topic><topic>Marital status</topic><topic>Normativity</topic><topic>Size</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>West, Kirsten K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Leslie A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 4 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 39</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 4</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online (PAO)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Population and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>West, Kirsten K.</au><au>Morgan, Leslie A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public Perceptions of the Ideal Number of Children for Contemporary Families</atitle><jtitle>Population and environment</jtitle><date>1987-09-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>160-172</pages><issn>0199-0039</issn><eissn>1573-7810</eissn><abstract>Demographic and family dynamics have been influenced by the recent downturn in average family size. This research examines perceptions of the ideal size for contemporary families and beliefs regarding factors which have contributed to families' decisions to have fewer children. Findings reveal that the two child family is the overwhelming standard chosen by respondents, and that this preference holds for virtually all demographic categories. Three of five reasons offered for smaller families today (expense of children, wives working and better birth control) were viewed as important by over 85% of those sampled.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Human Sciences Press</pub><doi>10.1007/BF01259306</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0199-0039 |
ispartof | Population and environment, 1987-09, Vol.9 (3), p.160-172 |
issn | 0199-0039 1573-7810 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59479525 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index; Springer LINK Archives |
subjects | Birth control Childlessness Children Demography Family Family size Female fertility Fertility Ideal numbers Marital status Normativity Size United States |
title | Public Perceptions of the Ideal Number of Children for Contemporary Families |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A07%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20Perceptions%20of%20the%20Ideal%20Number%20of%20Children%20for%20Contemporary%20Families&rft.jtitle=Population%20and%20environment&rft.au=West,%20Kirsten%20K.&rft.date=1987-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=160-172&rft.issn=0199-0039&rft.eissn=1573-7810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01259306&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27503074%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-73e537e5f068e166765bb95b8bc83099ccb3e0db62e0807674769d7ebbef99273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307180403&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27503074&rfr_iscdi=true |