Loading…

Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms

Standard approaches to defining and evaluating environmental risk tend to reflect technocratic rather than democratic values. One consequence is that institutional mechanisms for achieving citizen participation in risk decisions rarely are studied or evaluated. This article presents a survey of five...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science, technology, & human values technology, & human values, 1990-04, Vol.15 (2), p.226-243
Main Author: Fiorino, Daniel J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3
container_end_page 243
container_issue 2
container_start_page 226
container_title Science, technology, & human values
container_volume 15
creator Fiorino, Daniel J.
description Standard approaches to defining and evaluating environmental risk tend to reflect technocratic rather than democratic values. One consequence is that institutional mechanisms for achieving citizen participation in risk decisions rarely are studied or evaluated. This article presents a survey of five institutional mechanisms for allowing the lay public to influence environmental risk decisions: public hearings, initiatives, public surveys, negotiated rule making, and citizens review panels. It also defines democratic process criteria for assessing these and other participatory mechanisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/016224399001500204
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59532289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ423687</ericid><jstor_id>689860</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_016224399001500204</sage_id><sourcerecordid>689860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKd_QH0oCL7VJTdNm_o2xtSJokx9LlmaaOaWziQdzF9vS2WIgvflPpzvnHs5CB0TfEFIlg0wSQESmucYE4Yx4GQH9QhjEHNgZBf1WiBuiX104P0cN8OB9tB0ZIL5VDZ6FC4YaVYimMpGwpbR2K6Nq-xS2SAW0dT498toGD3Vbq02UaWjifXBhLrlG_1eyTdhjV_6Q7SnxcKro-_dRy9X4-fRTXz3cD0ZDe9imTAaYqI1SYDxnMBM4iQpNWgqQUMpuBbprMyl1EpjkWkGgjCqygzPUsUSTngGivbReZe7ctVHrXwolsZLtVgIq6raFyxnFIDnDXj2C5xXtWue9gWhOCNNHtCGgo6SrvLeKV2snFkKtykILtqSi78lN6bTzqSckVvD-DYBmvKskQed7MWr-nH1v8CTzjH3oXLbxJTnPMX0CxxLjo4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307181823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ERIC</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012</source><creator>Fiorino, Daniel J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fiorino, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><description>Standard approaches to defining and evaluating environmental risk tend to reflect technocratic rather than democratic values. One consequence is that institutional mechanisms for achieving citizen participation in risk decisions rarely are studied or evaluated. This article presents a survey of five institutional mechanisms for allowing the lay public to influence environmental risk decisions: public hearings, initiatives, public surveys, negotiated rule making, and citizens review panels. It also defines democratic process criteria for assessing these and other participatory mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-2439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8251</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/016224399001500204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Citizen Participation ; College Science ; Communities ; Delegation of authority ; Democratic theory ; Environmental agencies ; Environmental Education ; Environmental policy ; Environmental risk ; Hearings ; Higher Education ; Political debate ; Public administration ; Public hearings ; Public Opinion ; Science and Society ; Science Education ; Surveys ; Technology ; United States</subject><ispartof>Science, technology, &amp; human values, 1990-04, Vol.15 (2), p.226-243</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/689860$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/689860$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21845,27865,27924,27925,45082,45470,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ423687$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fiorino, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><title>Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms</title><title>Science, technology, &amp; human values</title><description>Standard approaches to defining and evaluating environmental risk tend to reflect technocratic rather than democratic values. One consequence is that institutional mechanisms for achieving citizen participation in risk decisions rarely are studied or evaluated. This article presents a survey of five institutional mechanisms for allowing the lay public to influence environmental risk decisions: public hearings, initiatives, public surveys, negotiated rule making, and citizens review panels. It also defines democratic process criteria for assessing these and other participatory mechanisms.</description><subject>Citizen Participation</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Delegation of authority</subject><subject>Democratic theory</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Environmental Education</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Hearings</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public hearings</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Science and Society</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0162-2439</issn><issn>1552-8251</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKd_QH0oCL7VJTdNm_o2xtSJokx9LlmaaOaWziQdzF9vS2WIgvflPpzvnHs5CB0TfEFIlg0wSQESmucYE4Yx4GQH9QhjEHNgZBf1WiBuiX104P0cN8OB9tB0ZIL5VDZ6FC4YaVYimMpGwpbR2K6Nq-xS2SAW0dT498toGD3Vbq02UaWjifXBhLrlG_1eyTdhjV_6Q7SnxcKro-_dRy9X4-fRTXz3cD0ZDe9imTAaYqI1SYDxnMBM4iQpNWgqQUMpuBbprMyl1EpjkWkGgjCqygzPUsUSTngGivbReZe7ctVHrXwolsZLtVgIq6raFyxnFIDnDXj2C5xXtWue9gWhOCNNHtCGgo6SrvLeKV2snFkKtykILtqSi78lN6bTzqSckVvD-DYBmvKskQed7MWr-nH1v8CTzjH3oXLbxJTnPMX0CxxLjo4</recordid><startdate>199004</startdate><enddate>199004</enddate><creator>Fiorino, Daniel J.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Harvard University, Program on Science, Technology, and Public Policy</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199004</creationdate><title>Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms</title><author>Fiorino, Daniel J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Citizen Participation</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Delegation of authority</topic><topic>Democratic theory</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Environmental Education</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Hearings</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public hearings</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Science and Society</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fiorino, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Science, technology, &amp; human values</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fiorino, Daniel J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ423687</ericid><atitle>Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>Science, technology, &amp; human values</jtitle><date>1990-04</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>226-243</pages><issn>0162-2439</issn><eissn>1552-8251</eissn><abstract>Standard approaches to defining and evaluating environmental risk tend to reflect technocratic rather than democratic values. One consequence is that institutional mechanisms for achieving citizen participation in risk decisions rarely are studied or evaluated. This article presents a survey of five institutional mechanisms for allowing the lay public to influence environmental risk decisions: public hearings, initiatives, public surveys, negotiated rule making, and citizens review panels. It also defines democratic process criteria for assessing these and other participatory mechanisms.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/016224399001500204</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0162-2439
ispartof Science, technology, & human values, 1990-04, Vol.15 (2), p.226-243
issn 0162-2439
1552-8251
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59532289
source PAIS Index; ERIC; JSTOR; SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012
subjects Citizen Participation
College Science
Communities
Delegation of authority
Democratic theory
Environmental agencies
Environmental Education
Environmental policy
Environmental risk
Hearings
Higher Education
Political debate
Public administration
Public hearings
Public Opinion
Science and Society
Science Education
Surveys
Technology
United States
title Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T15%3A35%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Citizen%20Participation%20and%20Environmental%20Risk:%20A%20Survey%20of%20Institutional%20Mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Science,%20technology,%20&%20human%20values&rft.au=Fiorino,%20Daniel%20J.&rft.date=1990-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=226-243&rft.issn=0162-2439&rft.eissn=1552-8251&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/016224399001500204&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E689860%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307181823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ423687&rft_jstor_id=689860&rft_sage_id=10.1177_016224399001500204&rfr_iscdi=true