Loading…
Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms
Standard approaches to defining and evaluating environmental risk tend to reflect technocratic rather than democratic values. One consequence is that institutional mechanisms for achieving citizen participation in risk decisions rarely are studied or evaluated. This article presents a survey of five...
Saved in:
Published in: | Science, technology, & human values technology, & human values, 1990-04, Vol.15 (2), p.226-243 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3 |
container_end_page | 243 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 226 |
container_title | Science, technology, & human values |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Fiorino, Daniel J. |
description | Standard approaches to defining and evaluating environmental risk tend to reflect technocratic rather than democratic values. One consequence is that institutional mechanisms for achieving citizen participation in risk decisions rarely are studied or evaluated. This article presents a survey of five institutional mechanisms for allowing the lay public to influence environmental risk decisions: public hearings, initiatives, public surveys, negotiated rule making, and citizens review panels. It also defines democratic process criteria for assessing these and other participatory mechanisms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/016224399001500204 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59532289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ423687</ericid><jstor_id>689860</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_016224399001500204</sage_id><sourcerecordid>689860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKd_QH0oCL7VJTdNm_o2xtSJokx9LlmaaOaWziQdzF9vS2WIgvflPpzvnHs5CB0TfEFIlg0wSQESmucYE4Yx4GQH9QhjEHNgZBf1WiBuiX104P0cN8OB9tB0ZIL5VDZ6FC4YaVYimMpGwpbR2K6Nq-xS2SAW0dT498toGD3Vbq02UaWjifXBhLrlG_1eyTdhjV_6Q7SnxcKro-_dRy9X4-fRTXz3cD0ZDe9imTAaYqI1SYDxnMBM4iQpNWgqQUMpuBbprMyl1EpjkWkGgjCqygzPUsUSTngGivbReZe7ctVHrXwolsZLtVgIq6raFyxnFIDnDXj2C5xXtWue9gWhOCNNHtCGgo6SrvLeKV2snFkKtykILtqSi78lN6bTzqSckVvD-DYBmvKskQed7MWr-nH1v8CTzjH3oXLbxJTnPMX0CxxLjo4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1307181823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ERIC</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012</source><creator>Fiorino, Daniel J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fiorino, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><description>Standard approaches to defining and evaluating environmental risk tend to reflect technocratic rather than democratic values. One consequence is that institutional mechanisms for achieving citizen participation in risk decisions rarely are studied or evaluated. This article presents a survey of five institutional mechanisms for allowing the lay public to influence environmental risk decisions: public hearings, initiatives, public surveys, negotiated rule making, and citizens review panels. It also defines democratic process criteria for assessing these and other participatory mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-2439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8251</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/016224399001500204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Citizen Participation ; College Science ; Communities ; Delegation of authority ; Democratic theory ; Environmental agencies ; Environmental Education ; Environmental policy ; Environmental risk ; Hearings ; Higher Education ; Political debate ; Public administration ; Public hearings ; Public Opinion ; Science and Society ; Science Education ; Surveys ; Technology ; United States</subject><ispartof>Science, technology, & human values, 1990-04, Vol.15 (2), p.226-243</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/689860$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/689860$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21845,27865,27924,27925,45082,45470,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ423687$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fiorino, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><title>Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms</title><title>Science, technology, & human values</title><description>Standard approaches to defining and evaluating environmental risk tend to reflect technocratic rather than democratic values. One consequence is that institutional mechanisms for achieving citizen participation in risk decisions rarely are studied or evaluated. This article presents a survey of five institutional mechanisms for allowing the lay public to influence environmental risk decisions: public hearings, initiatives, public surveys, negotiated rule making, and citizens review panels. It also defines democratic process criteria for assessing these and other participatory mechanisms.</description><subject>Citizen Participation</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Delegation of authority</subject><subject>Democratic theory</subject><subject>Environmental agencies</subject><subject>Environmental Education</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Hearings</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public hearings</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Science and Society</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0162-2439</issn><issn>1552-8251</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKd_QH0oCL7VJTdNm_o2xtSJokx9LlmaaOaWziQdzF9vS2WIgvflPpzvnHs5CB0TfEFIlg0wSQESmucYE4Yx4GQH9QhjEHNgZBf1WiBuiX104P0cN8OB9tB0ZIL5VDZ6FC4YaVYimMpGwpbR2K6Nq-xS2SAW0dT498toGD3Vbq02UaWjifXBhLrlG_1eyTdhjV_6Q7SnxcKro-_dRy9X4-fRTXz3cD0ZDe9imTAaYqI1SYDxnMBM4iQpNWgqQUMpuBbprMyl1EpjkWkGgjCqygzPUsUSTngGivbReZe7ctVHrXwolsZLtVgIq6raFyxnFIDnDXj2C5xXtWue9gWhOCNNHtCGgo6SrvLeKV2snFkKtykILtqSi78lN6bTzqSckVvD-DYBmvKskQed7MWr-nH1v8CTzjH3oXLbxJTnPMX0CxxLjo4</recordid><startdate>199004</startdate><enddate>199004</enddate><creator>Fiorino, Daniel J.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Harvard University, Program on Science, Technology, and Public Policy</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199004</creationdate><title>Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms</title><author>Fiorino, Daniel J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Citizen Participation</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Delegation of authority</topic><topic>Democratic theory</topic><topic>Environmental agencies</topic><topic>Environmental Education</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Hearings</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public hearings</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Science and Society</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fiorino, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Science, technology, & human values</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fiorino, Daniel J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ423687</ericid><atitle>Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>Science, technology, & human values</jtitle><date>1990-04</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>226-243</pages><issn>0162-2439</issn><eissn>1552-8251</eissn><abstract>Standard approaches to defining and evaluating environmental risk tend to reflect technocratic rather than democratic values. One consequence is that institutional mechanisms for achieving citizen participation in risk decisions rarely are studied or evaluated. This article presents a survey of five institutional mechanisms for allowing the lay public to influence environmental risk decisions: public hearings, initiatives, public surveys, negotiated rule making, and citizens review panels. It also defines democratic process criteria for assessing these and other participatory mechanisms.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/016224399001500204</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0162-2439 |
ispartof | Science, technology, & human values, 1990-04, Vol.15 (2), p.226-243 |
issn | 0162-2439 1552-8251 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59532289 |
source | PAIS Index; ERIC; JSTOR; SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012 |
subjects | Citizen Participation College Science Communities Delegation of authority Democratic theory Environmental agencies Environmental Education Environmental policy Environmental risk Hearings Higher Education Political debate Public administration Public hearings Public Opinion Science and Society Science Education Surveys Technology United States |
title | Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T15%3A35%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Citizen%20Participation%20and%20Environmental%20Risk:%20A%20Survey%20of%20Institutional%20Mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Science,%20technology,%20&%20human%20values&rft.au=Fiorino,%20Daniel%20J.&rft.date=1990-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=226-243&rft.issn=0162-2439&rft.eissn=1552-8251&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/016224399001500204&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E689860%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff14258912bc044df2f3c2f2da8fa6bd9ccfef0a7f52a153ed70b6e5481872e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1307181823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ423687&rft_jstor_id=689860&rft_sage_id=10.1177_016224399001500204&rfr_iscdi=true |