Loading…

Taking the Basic Structure Seriously

The theory of justice that John Rawls spent his life developing and refining contains dozens of ideas that each have spurred major scholarly debate. One of these is that the subject of justice is the basic structure of society. In his major works Rawls gives slightly different formulations to the co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perspectives on politics 2006-03, Vol.4 (1), p.91-97
Main Author: Young, Iris Marion
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9f7d1d8259829f1287704170cd4060cb7d31261bca08205e1004c1854f50311a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9f7d1d8259829f1287704170cd4060cb7d31261bca08205e1004c1854f50311a3
container_end_page 97
container_issue 1
container_start_page 91
container_title Perspectives on politics
container_volume 4
creator Young, Iris Marion
description The theory of justice that John Rawls spent his life developing and refining contains dozens of ideas that each have spurred major scholarly debate. One of these is that the subject of justice is the basic structure of society. In his major works Rawls gives slightly different formulations to the concept of basic structure, but the core idea remains the same. Early in A Theory of Justice Rawls proposes to offer “a conception of justice as providing in the first instance a standard whereby the distributive aspects of the basic structure of society are to be assessed.” Political Liberalism devotes an entire chapter to explicating what it means to say that the basic structure is the subject of justice. There Rawls defines basic structure “as the way in which major social institutions fit together into one system, and how they assign fundamental rights and duties and shape the division of advantages that arise through social cooperation”. More recently, Rawls reiterates the notion of the basic structure in Justice as Fairness: A Restatement:Iris Marion Young is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago (iyoung@uchicago.edu). Among books she has published is Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford University Press, 2000. Global Challenges: On War, Self-Determination and Global Justice is forthcoming from Polity Press in 2006.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1537592706060099
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59716373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1537592706060099</cupid><jstor_id>3688629</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3688629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9f7d1d8259829f1287704170cd4060cb7d31261bca08205e1004c1854f50311a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLw0AQXkTBWv0BgoccxFt0Zjf7OmqpDyh4aD0v282mJqZN3U0O_fcmpHgRZA4z8D345iPkGuEeAeXDEjmTXFMJoh_Q-oRMkGeYglbidLiZTAf8nFzEWAFQykBNyO3KfpW7TdJ--uTJxtIlyzZ0ru2CT5Y-lE0X68MlOStsHf3VcU_Jx_N8NXtNF-8vb7PHReooF22qC5ljrijXiuoCqZISMpTg8qzP5NYyZ0gFrp0FRYF7BMgcKp4VHBiiZVNyN_ruQ_Pd-diabRmdr2u7830Qw7VEwSTriTgSXWhiDL4w-1BubTgYBDP0Yf700WtuRk0V2yb8CphQStABZkdLu12HMt94UzVd2PX__mP6A98IaFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>59716373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Taking the Basic Structure Seriously</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Young, Iris Marion</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Iris Marion</creatorcontrib><description>The theory of justice that John Rawls spent his life developing and refining contains dozens of ideas that each have spurred major scholarly debate. One of these is that the subject of justice is the basic structure of society. In his major works Rawls gives slightly different formulations to the concept of basic structure, but the core idea remains the same. Early in A Theory of Justice Rawls proposes to offer “a conception of justice as providing in the first instance a standard whereby the distributive aspects of the basic structure of society are to be assessed.” Political Liberalism devotes an entire chapter to explicating what it means to say that the basic structure is the subject of justice. There Rawls defines basic structure “as the way in which major social institutions fit together into one system, and how they assign fundamental rights and duties and shape the division of advantages that arise through social cooperation”. More recently, Rawls reiterates the notion of the basic structure in Justice as Fairness: A Restatement:Iris Marion Young is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago (iyoung@uchicago.edu). Among books she has published is Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford University Press, 2000. Global Challenges: On War, Self-Determination and Global Justice is forthcoming from Polity Press in 2006.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1537592706060099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cooperation ; Cultural customs ; Disabilities ; Distributive Justice ; Division of Labor ; Fairness ; Justice ; Procedural justice ; Rawls, John ; Social Justice ; Social Structure ; Social structures ; SYMPOSIUM ; Symposium: John Rawls and the Study of Politics: Legacies of Inquiry Jane Reed/Harvard News Office ; Theoretical Problems</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on politics, 2006-03, Vol.4 (1), p.91-97</ispartof><rights>2006 American Political Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 The American Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9f7d1d8259829f1287704170cd4060cb7d31261bca08205e1004c1854f50311a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9f7d1d8259829f1287704170cd4060cb7d31261bca08205e1004c1854f50311a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3688629$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1537592706060099/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446,72703</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Iris Marion</creatorcontrib><title>Taking the Basic Structure Seriously</title><title>Perspectives on politics</title><addtitle>Persp on Pol</addtitle><description>The theory of justice that John Rawls spent his life developing and refining contains dozens of ideas that each have spurred major scholarly debate. One of these is that the subject of justice is the basic structure of society. In his major works Rawls gives slightly different formulations to the concept of basic structure, but the core idea remains the same. Early in A Theory of Justice Rawls proposes to offer “a conception of justice as providing in the first instance a standard whereby the distributive aspects of the basic structure of society are to be assessed.” Political Liberalism devotes an entire chapter to explicating what it means to say that the basic structure is the subject of justice. There Rawls defines basic structure “as the way in which major social institutions fit together into one system, and how they assign fundamental rights and duties and shape the division of advantages that arise through social cooperation”. More recently, Rawls reiterates the notion of the basic structure in Justice as Fairness: A Restatement:Iris Marion Young is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago (iyoung@uchicago.edu). Among books she has published is Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford University Press, 2000. Global Challenges: On War, Self-Determination and Global Justice is forthcoming from Polity Press in 2006.</description><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cultural customs</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Distributive Justice</subject><subject>Division of Labor</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Procedural justice</subject><subject>Rawls, John</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Social Structure</subject><subject>Social structures</subject><subject>SYMPOSIUM</subject><subject>Symposium: John Rawls and the Study of Politics: Legacies of Inquiry Jane Reed/Harvard News Office</subject><subject>Theoretical Problems</subject><issn>1537-5927</issn><issn>1541-0986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UEtLw0AQXkTBWv0BgoccxFt0Zjf7OmqpDyh4aD0v282mJqZN3U0O_fcmpHgRZA4z8D345iPkGuEeAeXDEjmTXFMJoh_Q-oRMkGeYglbidLiZTAf8nFzEWAFQykBNyO3KfpW7TdJ--uTJxtIlyzZ0ru2CT5Y-lE0X68MlOStsHf3VcU_Jx_N8NXtNF-8vb7PHReooF22qC5ljrijXiuoCqZISMpTg8qzP5NYyZ0gFrp0FRYF7BMgcKp4VHBiiZVNyN_ruQ_Pd-diabRmdr2u7830Qw7VEwSTriTgSXWhiDL4w-1BubTgYBDP0Yf700WtuRk0V2yb8CphQStABZkdLu12HMt94UzVd2PX__mP6A98IaFA</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Young, Iris Marion</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>Taking the Basic Structure Seriously</title><author>Young, Iris Marion</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9f7d1d8259829f1287704170cd4060cb7d31261bca08205e1004c1854f50311a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cultural customs</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Distributive Justice</topic><topic>Division of Labor</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Procedural justice</topic><topic>Rawls, John</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Social Structure</topic><topic>Social structures</topic><topic>SYMPOSIUM</topic><topic>Symposium: John Rawls and the Study of Politics: Legacies of Inquiry Jane Reed/Harvard News Office</topic><topic>Theoretical Problems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Iris Marion</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Iris Marion</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Taking the Basic Structure Seriously</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle><addtitle>Persp on Pol</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>91-97</pages><issn>1537-5927</issn><eissn>1541-0986</eissn><abstract>The theory of justice that John Rawls spent his life developing and refining contains dozens of ideas that each have spurred major scholarly debate. One of these is that the subject of justice is the basic structure of society. In his major works Rawls gives slightly different formulations to the concept of basic structure, but the core idea remains the same. Early in A Theory of Justice Rawls proposes to offer “a conception of justice as providing in the first instance a standard whereby the distributive aspects of the basic structure of society are to be assessed.” Political Liberalism devotes an entire chapter to explicating what it means to say that the basic structure is the subject of justice. There Rawls defines basic structure “as the way in which major social institutions fit together into one system, and how they assign fundamental rights and duties and shape the division of advantages that arise through social cooperation”. More recently, Rawls reiterates the notion of the basic structure in Justice as Fairness: A Restatement:Iris Marion Young is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago (iyoung@uchicago.edu). Among books she has published is Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford University Press, 2000. Global Challenges: On War, Self-Determination and Global Justice is forthcoming from Polity Press in 2006.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1537592706060099</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1537-5927
ispartof Perspectives on politics, 2006-03, Vol.4 (1), p.91-97
issn 1537-5927
1541-0986
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59716373
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press
subjects Cooperation
Cultural customs
Disabilities
Distributive Justice
Division of Labor
Fairness
Justice
Procedural justice
Rawls, John
Social Justice
Social Structure
Social structures
SYMPOSIUM
Symposium: John Rawls and the Study of Politics: Legacies of Inquiry Jane Reed/Harvard News Office
Theoretical Problems
title Taking the Basic Structure Seriously
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A23%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taking%20the%20Basic%20Structure%20Seriously&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20politics&rft.au=Young,%20Iris%20Marion&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=91-97&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1537592706060099&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3688629%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-9f7d1d8259829f1287704170cd4060cb7d31261bca08205e1004c1854f50311a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=59716373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1537592706060099&rft_jstor_id=3688629&rfr_iscdi=true