Loading…

Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection

It has recently been argued that apparent peace between democracies may be the result of political similarity rather than joint democracy, and that there may exist an "autocratic peace" which is similar to the democratic peace. If political similarity generally is the cause of peace rather...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International studies quarterly 2006-06, Vol.50 (2), p.313-338
Main Author: SCOTT BENNETT, D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433
container_end_page 338
container_issue 2
container_start_page 313
container_title International studies quarterly
container_volume 50
creator SCOTT BENNETT, D.
description It has recently been argued that apparent peace between democracies may be the result of political similarity rather than joint democracy, and that there may exist an "autocratic peace" which is similar to the democratic peace. If political similarity generally is the cause of peace rather than joint democracy specifically, then the democratic peace is merely a statistical artifact that follows from separating out a selected subset of data. In addition, we do not know whether the autocratic peace or democratic peace is stronger, if they both exist. Existing empirical specifications of the connection between joint regime type and international conflict have not been adequate to assess these arguments. I develop a specification of joint regime-type variables that uses continuous measures without arbitrary cutoffs and allows us to assess a larger set of hypothesized regime-type effects. I find that jointly democratic and jointly autocratic pairs of states are both less conflict prone than other pairings, but that political similarity apart from these extremes has a much smaller effect on the risk of conflict. The results suggest that political similarity between coherent regimes (those at extremes of the institutionalized democracy-autocracy scale) encourages dyadic peace. But although there is a lower risk of conflict in both jointly democratic and jointly autocratic dyads, I find that the democratic peace is clearly stronger than the autocratic peace.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00404.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59721351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3693613</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3693613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTFv2zAQhYmgAeI6-QcZhAzdpB5FiqTGwK3dFkIzREGALARNkagUW3RJCbH_fcSq8NClXEjife9wdw-hBEOGp_O5yzBlIs0pF1kOwDIACjQ7XqDFWfiAFgA5pEIQcoU-htBB_JflAm1q96Z8k6hk5fqh7Uc3huTxYHRrW62G1vWJs8nwyyRfzN5pr_QpvR-H-RU9vdGRukaXVu2Cufl7L9HT-mu9-pZWD5vvq_sq1RT4kGptgSjBFeZCbO2Wc4sFbyxRuiFbznTRWAPCGNOwolS0IbbhU6MNwKRQQpbo01z34N3v0YRB7tugzW6nejO1LouS55gU-L8gYUXOShATePcP2LnR99MQMie0pELQWE3MkPYuBG-sPPh2r_xJYpAxB9nJuG4Z1y1jDvJPDvI4WW9naxcG588-wkrCcBwoneU2DOZ4lpV_lYwTXsjnnxtZlXW9Jj9eZEXeAfuxlTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234948841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</creatorcontrib><description>It has recently been argued that apparent peace between democracies may be the result of political similarity rather than joint democracy, and that there may exist an "autocratic peace" which is similar to the democratic peace. If political similarity generally is the cause of peace rather than joint democracy specifically, then the democratic peace is merely a statistical artifact that follows from separating out a selected subset of data. In addition, we do not know whether the autocratic peace or democratic peace is stronger, if they both exist. Existing empirical specifications of the connection between joint regime type and international conflict have not been adequate to assess these arguments. I develop a specification of joint regime-type variables that uses continuous measures without arbitrary cutoffs and allows us to assess a larger set of hypothesized regime-type effects. I find that jointly democratic and jointly autocratic pairs of states are both less conflict prone than other pairings, but that political similarity apart from these extremes has a much smaller effect on the risk of conflict. The results suggest that political similarity between coherent regimes (those at extremes of the institutionalized democracy-autocracy scale) encourages dyadic peace. But although there is a lower risk of conflict in both jointly democratic and jointly autocratic dyads, I find that the democratic peace is clearly stronger than the autocratic peace.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-8833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00404.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ISQUDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Armed conflict ; Autocracy ; Conflict ; Datasets ; Democracy ; Democratic Peace Theory ; Dictatorship ; Dyadic relations ; Empirical research ; Hypotheses ; Idealism ; International Relations ; International relations theory ; International system ; Modeling ; Parametric models ; Peace ; Peacetime ; Political conflict ; Political regimes ; Political theory ; Polities</subject><ispartof>International studies quarterly, 2006-06, Vol.50 (2), p.313-338</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 International Studies Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Jun 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3693613$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3693613$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,33201,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection</title><title>International studies quarterly</title><description>It has recently been argued that apparent peace between democracies may be the result of political similarity rather than joint democracy, and that there may exist an "autocratic peace" which is similar to the democratic peace. If political similarity generally is the cause of peace rather than joint democracy specifically, then the democratic peace is merely a statistical artifact that follows from separating out a selected subset of data. In addition, we do not know whether the autocratic peace or democratic peace is stronger, if they both exist. Existing empirical specifications of the connection between joint regime type and international conflict have not been adequate to assess these arguments. I develop a specification of joint regime-type variables that uses continuous measures without arbitrary cutoffs and allows us to assess a larger set of hypothesized regime-type effects. I find that jointly democratic and jointly autocratic pairs of states are both less conflict prone than other pairings, but that political similarity apart from these extremes has a much smaller effect on the risk of conflict. The results suggest that political similarity between coherent regimes (those at extremes of the institutionalized democracy-autocracy scale) encourages dyadic peace. But although there is a lower risk of conflict in both jointly democratic and jointly autocratic dyads, I find that the democratic peace is clearly stronger than the autocratic peace.</description><subject>Armed conflict</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratic Peace Theory</subject><subject>Dictatorship</subject><subject>Dyadic relations</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Idealism</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>International relations theory</subject><subject>International system</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Peacetime</subject><subject>Political conflict</subject><subject>Political regimes</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Polities</subject><issn>0020-8833</issn><issn>1468-2478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTFv2zAQhYmgAeI6-QcZhAzdpB5FiqTGwK3dFkIzREGALARNkagUW3RJCbH_fcSq8NClXEjife9wdw-hBEOGp_O5yzBlIs0pF1kOwDIACjQ7XqDFWfiAFgA5pEIQcoU-htBB_JflAm1q96Z8k6hk5fqh7Uc3huTxYHRrW62G1vWJs8nwyyRfzN5pr_QpvR-H-RU9vdGRukaXVu2Cufl7L9HT-mu9-pZWD5vvq_sq1RT4kGptgSjBFeZCbO2Wc4sFbyxRuiFbznTRWAPCGNOwolS0IbbhU6MNwKRQQpbo01z34N3v0YRB7tugzW6nejO1LouS55gU-L8gYUXOShATePcP2LnR99MQMie0pELQWE3MkPYuBG-sPPh2r_xJYpAxB9nJuG4Z1y1jDvJPDvI4WW9naxcG588-wkrCcBwoneU2DOZ4lpV_lYwTXsjnnxtZlXW9Jj9eZEXeAfuxlTM</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection</title><author>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Armed conflict</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratic Peace Theory</topic><topic>Dictatorship</topic><topic>Dyadic relations</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Idealism</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>International relations theory</topic><topic>International system</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Peacetime</topic><topic>Political conflict</topic><topic>Political regimes</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Polities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International studies quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection</atitle><jtitle>International studies quarterly</jtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>313-338</pages><issn>0020-8833</issn><eissn>1468-2478</eissn><coden>ISQUDJ</coden><abstract>It has recently been argued that apparent peace between democracies may be the result of political similarity rather than joint democracy, and that there may exist an "autocratic peace" which is similar to the democratic peace. If political similarity generally is the cause of peace rather than joint democracy specifically, then the democratic peace is merely a statistical artifact that follows from separating out a selected subset of data. In addition, we do not know whether the autocratic peace or democratic peace is stronger, if they both exist. Existing empirical specifications of the connection between joint regime type and international conflict have not been adequate to assess these arguments. I develop a specification of joint regime-type variables that uses continuous measures without arbitrary cutoffs and allows us to assess a larger set of hypothesized regime-type effects. I find that jointly democratic and jointly autocratic pairs of states are both less conflict prone than other pairings, but that political similarity apart from these extremes has a much smaller effect on the risk of conflict. The results suggest that political similarity between coherent regimes (those at extremes of the institutionalized democracy-autocracy scale) encourages dyadic peace. But although there is a lower risk of conflict in both jointly democratic and jointly autocratic dyads, I find that the democratic peace is clearly stronger than the autocratic peace.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00404.x</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-8833
ispartof International studies quarterly, 2006-06, Vol.50 (2), p.313-338
issn 0020-8833
1468-2478
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59721351
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Oxford Journals Online
subjects Armed conflict
Autocracy
Conflict
Datasets
Democracy
Democratic Peace Theory
Dictatorship
Dyadic relations
Empirical research
Hypotheses
Idealism
International Relations
International relations theory
International system
Modeling
Parametric models
Peace
Peacetime
Political conflict
Political regimes
Political theory
Polities
title Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A49%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20a%20Continuous%20Specification%20of%20the%20Democracy-Autocracy%20Connection&rft.jtitle=International%20studies%20quarterly&rft.au=SCOTT%20BENNETT,%20D.&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=313-338&rft.issn=0020-8833&rft.eissn=1468-2478&rft.coden=ISQUDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00404.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3693613%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234948841&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3693613&rfr_iscdi=true