Loading…
Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection
It has recently been argued that apparent peace between democracies may be the result of political similarity rather than joint democracy, and that there may exist an "autocratic peace" which is similar to the democratic peace. If political similarity generally is the cause of peace rather...
Saved in:
Published in: | International studies quarterly 2006-06, Vol.50 (2), p.313-338 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433 |
container_end_page | 338 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 313 |
container_title | International studies quarterly |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | SCOTT BENNETT, D. |
description | It has recently been argued that apparent peace between democracies may be the result of political similarity rather than joint democracy, and that there may exist an "autocratic peace" which is similar to the democratic peace. If political similarity generally is the cause of peace rather than joint democracy specifically, then the democratic peace is merely a statistical artifact that follows from separating out a selected subset of data. In addition, we do not know whether the autocratic peace or democratic peace is stronger, if they both exist. Existing empirical specifications of the connection between joint regime type and international conflict have not been adequate to assess these arguments. I develop a specification of joint regime-type variables that uses continuous measures without arbitrary cutoffs and allows us to assess a larger set of hypothesized regime-type effects. I find that jointly democratic and jointly autocratic pairs of states are both less conflict prone than other pairings, but that political similarity apart from these extremes has a much smaller effect on the risk of conflict. The results suggest that political similarity between coherent regimes (those at extremes of the institutionalized democracy-autocracy scale) encourages dyadic peace. But although there is a lower risk of conflict in both jointly democratic and jointly autocratic dyads, I find that the democratic peace is clearly stronger than the autocratic peace. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00404.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59721351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3693613</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3693613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTFv2zAQhYmgAeI6-QcZhAzdpB5FiqTGwK3dFkIzREGALARNkagUW3RJCbH_fcSq8NClXEjife9wdw-hBEOGp_O5yzBlIs0pF1kOwDIACjQ7XqDFWfiAFgA5pEIQcoU-htBB_JflAm1q96Z8k6hk5fqh7Uc3huTxYHRrW62G1vWJs8nwyyRfzN5pr_QpvR-H-RU9vdGRukaXVu2Cufl7L9HT-mu9-pZWD5vvq_sq1RT4kGptgSjBFeZCbO2Wc4sFbyxRuiFbznTRWAPCGNOwolS0IbbhU6MNwKRQQpbo01z34N3v0YRB7tugzW6nejO1LouS55gU-L8gYUXOShATePcP2LnR99MQMie0pELQWE3MkPYuBG-sPPh2r_xJYpAxB9nJuG4Z1y1jDvJPDvI4WW9naxcG588-wkrCcBwoneU2DOZ4lpV_lYwTXsjnnxtZlXW9Jj9eZEXeAfuxlTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234948841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</creatorcontrib><description>It has recently been argued that apparent peace between democracies may be the result of political similarity rather than joint democracy, and that there may exist an "autocratic peace" which is similar to the democratic peace. If political similarity generally is the cause of peace rather than joint democracy specifically, then the democratic peace is merely a statistical artifact that follows from separating out a selected subset of data. In addition, we do not know whether the autocratic peace or democratic peace is stronger, if they both exist. Existing empirical specifications of the connection between joint regime type and international conflict have not been adequate to assess these arguments. I develop a specification of joint regime-type variables that uses continuous measures without arbitrary cutoffs and allows us to assess a larger set of hypothesized regime-type effects. I find that jointly democratic and jointly autocratic pairs of states are both less conflict prone than other pairings, but that political similarity apart from these extremes has a much smaller effect on the risk of conflict. The results suggest that political similarity between coherent regimes (those at extremes of the institutionalized democracy-autocracy scale) encourages dyadic peace. But although there is a lower risk of conflict in both jointly democratic and jointly autocratic dyads, I find that the democratic peace is clearly stronger than the autocratic peace.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-8833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00404.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ISQUDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Armed conflict ; Autocracy ; Conflict ; Datasets ; Democracy ; Democratic Peace Theory ; Dictatorship ; Dyadic relations ; Empirical research ; Hypotheses ; Idealism ; International Relations ; International relations theory ; International system ; Modeling ; Parametric models ; Peace ; Peacetime ; Political conflict ; Political regimes ; Political theory ; Polities</subject><ispartof>International studies quarterly, 2006-06, Vol.50 (2), p.313-338</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 International Studies Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Jun 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3693613$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3693613$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,33201,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection</title><title>International studies quarterly</title><description>It has recently been argued that apparent peace between democracies may be the result of political similarity rather than joint democracy, and that there may exist an "autocratic peace" which is similar to the democratic peace. If political similarity generally is the cause of peace rather than joint democracy specifically, then the democratic peace is merely a statistical artifact that follows from separating out a selected subset of data. In addition, we do not know whether the autocratic peace or democratic peace is stronger, if they both exist. Existing empirical specifications of the connection between joint regime type and international conflict have not been adequate to assess these arguments. I develop a specification of joint regime-type variables that uses continuous measures without arbitrary cutoffs and allows us to assess a larger set of hypothesized regime-type effects. I find that jointly democratic and jointly autocratic pairs of states are both less conflict prone than other pairings, but that political similarity apart from these extremes has a much smaller effect on the risk of conflict. The results suggest that political similarity between coherent regimes (those at extremes of the institutionalized democracy-autocracy scale) encourages dyadic peace. But although there is a lower risk of conflict in both jointly democratic and jointly autocratic dyads, I find that the democratic peace is clearly stronger than the autocratic peace.</description><subject>Armed conflict</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratic Peace Theory</subject><subject>Dictatorship</subject><subject>Dyadic relations</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Idealism</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>International relations theory</subject><subject>International system</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Peacetime</subject><subject>Political conflict</subject><subject>Political regimes</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Polities</subject><issn>0020-8833</issn><issn>1468-2478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTFv2zAQhYmgAeI6-QcZhAzdpB5FiqTGwK3dFkIzREGALARNkagUW3RJCbH_fcSq8NClXEjife9wdw-hBEOGp_O5yzBlIs0pF1kOwDIACjQ7XqDFWfiAFgA5pEIQcoU-htBB_JflAm1q96Z8k6hk5fqh7Uc3huTxYHRrW62G1vWJs8nwyyRfzN5pr_QpvR-H-RU9vdGRukaXVu2Cufl7L9HT-mu9-pZWD5vvq_sq1RT4kGptgSjBFeZCbO2Wc4sFbyxRuiFbznTRWAPCGNOwolS0IbbhU6MNwKRQQpbo01z34N3v0YRB7tugzW6nejO1LouS55gU-L8gYUXOShATePcP2LnR99MQMie0pELQWE3MkPYuBG-sPPh2r_xJYpAxB9nJuG4Z1y1jDvJPDvI4WW9naxcG588-wkrCcBwoneU2DOZ4lpV_lYwTXsjnnxtZlXW9Jj9eZEXeAfuxlTM</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection</title><author>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Armed conflict</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratic Peace Theory</topic><topic>Dictatorship</topic><topic>Dyadic relations</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Idealism</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>International relations theory</topic><topic>International system</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Peacetime</topic><topic>Political conflict</topic><topic>Political regimes</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Polities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International studies quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCOTT BENNETT, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection</atitle><jtitle>International studies quarterly</jtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>313-338</pages><issn>0020-8833</issn><eissn>1468-2478</eissn><coden>ISQUDJ</coden><abstract>It has recently been argued that apparent peace between democracies may be the result of political similarity rather than joint democracy, and that there may exist an "autocratic peace" which is similar to the democratic peace. If political similarity generally is the cause of peace rather than joint democracy specifically, then the democratic peace is merely a statistical artifact that follows from separating out a selected subset of data. In addition, we do not know whether the autocratic peace or democratic peace is stronger, if they both exist. Existing empirical specifications of the connection between joint regime type and international conflict have not been adequate to assess these arguments. I develop a specification of joint regime-type variables that uses continuous measures without arbitrary cutoffs and allows us to assess a larger set of hypothesized regime-type effects. I find that jointly democratic and jointly autocratic pairs of states are both less conflict prone than other pairings, but that political similarity apart from these extremes has a much smaller effect on the risk of conflict. The results suggest that political similarity between coherent regimes (those at extremes of the institutionalized democracy-autocracy scale) encourages dyadic peace. But although there is a lower risk of conflict in both jointly democratic and jointly autocratic dyads, I find that the democratic peace is clearly stronger than the autocratic peace.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00404.x</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-8833 |
ispartof | International studies quarterly, 2006-06, Vol.50 (2), p.313-338 |
issn | 0020-8833 1468-2478 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59721351 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Armed conflict Autocracy Conflict Datasets Democracy Democratic Peace Theory Dictatorship Dyadic relations Empirical research Hypotheses Idealism International Relations International relations theory International system Modeling Parametric models Peace Peacetime Political conflict Political regimes Political theory Polities |
title | Toward a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A49%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20a%20Continuous%20Specification%20of%20the%20Democracy-Autocracy%20Connection&rft.jtitle=International%20studies%20quarterly&rft.au=SCOTT%20BENNETT,%20D.&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=313-338&rft.issn=0020-8833&rft.eissn=1468-2478&rft.coden=ISQUDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00404.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3693613%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ccf03a87a1788bfb77f187df3acd3b76c5dfe08eeed659a4d3fd7099d005df433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234948841&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3693613&rfr_iscdi=true |