Imperialism in Conservative Defence and Foreign Policy: Leo Amery and the Chamberlains, 1903-39

This article explores the place of imperialism in aspects of Conservative defence and foreign policy between 1903 and 1939, through a comparative study of Leo Amery and the three Chamberlains (Joseph, Austen and Neville), all of whom were nominally imperialists. The article draws conclusions in two...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of imperial and Commonwealth history 2006-12, Vol.34 (4), p.505-527
Main Author: Grayson, Richard S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Comparative analysis
Conservatism
Conservatives
Defence policy
Disputes
Economic Policy
Foreign Policy
Historiography
Imperialism
Pluralism
Political history
United Kingdom
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article explores the place of imperialism in aspects of Conservative defence and foreign policy between 1903 and 1939, through a comparative study of Leo Amery and the three Chamberlains (Joseph, Austen and Neville), all of whom were nominally imperialists. The article draws conclusions in two general areas. First, it argues that there has not been enough attention to the diversity of imperialist approaches to policy. Exploring the army reform controversy of 1903 suggests a fault line between some imperialists over whether imperial unity could be developed from intra-colonial or extra-colonial sources. Second, the paper contends that the functions of imperialism in Conservative policy have not been fully understood, with previous work focusing largely on social and economic policy. The article points to the existence of an 'imperial foreign policy' strategy within the Conservative party in the 1920s and 1930s. The historiography of imperialism within the Conservative party should therefore recognise the diversity of imperialist approaches to policy and consider the application of imperial thinking to discussions on foreign policy.
ISSN:0308-6534
1743-9329
DOI:10.1080/03086530600991423