Loading…
New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation
Contrary to initial predictions Internet-mediated forms of communication have not become mediums of mass communication. Traditional media still reach far more people than even the most popular websites. Still, there is evidence that blogs in particular help mobilize opinions, and set the agenda for...
Saved in:
Published in: | Public choice 2008-01, Vol.134 (1/2), p.109-123 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173 |
container_end_page | 123 |
container_issue | 1/2 |
container_start_page | 109 |
container_title | Public choice |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Woodly, Deva |
description | Contrary to initial predictions Internet-mediated forms of communication have not become mediums of mass communication. Traditional media still reach far more people than even the most popular websites. Still, there is evidence that blogs in particular help mobilize opinions, and set the agenda for political elites such as journalists and politicians, while providing interested citizens with a new technology of knowledge as well as a surprisingly effective way to participate in politics. This study focuses on how the presence of blogs has altered the structure of political communication. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59785179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27698214</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27698214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGr1TAQhYMoeH36A1wIwYUrq5lp2qQreV59T-GhD9R1SNPpJZc2uSa9iP_e1IqCC12EnCHfmZlwGHsM4gUIoV5mAEBVFVl1KGSl7rAdNKquFAi4y3ZCSF01Grv77EHORyFE3epmx8wH-sb3cT7RQsF5ytwH_obm6JJdvFuf5nPwrhQxvOKvp3jIz_nlgcJg-SdaFh8O3IaB38bJF4Od-K1NRfjTT8tDdm-0U6ZHv-4L9uXq7ef9u-rm4_X7_eVN5WQLS6U70lYPYkDUI_SoXF93rqaeemHLcWiltgSjbBTiiH0_YN_0pFAWBaq-YM-2vqcUv54pL2b22dE02UDxnE3TKd2A6v4L1m3XtFKKAj79CzzGcwrlEwaFQqhbBQWCDXIp5pxoNKfkZ5u-GxBmDcZswZhVrsGYdVXcPLmw4UDpT-N_mZ5spmNeYvo9BVXbaQRZ_wDZzJqG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207213671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Woodly, Deva</creator><creatorcontrib>Woodly, Deva</creatorcontrib><description>Contrary to initial predictions Internet-mediated forms of communication have not become mediums of mass communication. Traditional media still reach far more people than even the most popular websites. Still, there is evidence that blogs in particular help mobilize opinions, and set the agenda for political elites such as journalists and politicians, while providing interested citizens with a new technology of knowledge as well as a surprisingly effective way to participate in politics. This study focuses on how the presence of blogs has altered the structure of political communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PUCHBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer</publisher><subject>Bias ; Blogs ; Communication ; Competence ; Democracy ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Hegemony ; Internet ; Journalism ; Journalists ; Mass Media ; Mobilization ; News content ; News media ; Objectivity ; Opinions ; Participation ; Political behavior ; Political communication ; Political debate ; Political elites ; Political participation ; Political Science ; Politics ; Power ; Public choice ; Public Finance ; Studies ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Public choice, 2008-01, Vol.134 (1/2), p.109-123</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, BV 2007</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/207213671/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/207213671?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,11906,12845,12847,21387,21394,21395,27924,27925,33223,33224,33611,33612,33985,33986,34530,34531,36050,36051,36060,36061,43733,43948,44115,44361,44363,58238,58471,74221,74468,74639,74893,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woodly, Deva</creatorcontrib><title>New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation</title><title>Public choice</title><addtitle>Public Choice</addtitle><description>Contrary to initial predictions Internet-mediated forms of communication have not become mediums of mass communication. Traditional media still reach far more people than even the most popular websites. Still, there is evidence that blogs in particular help mobilize opinions, and set the agenda for political elites such as journalists and politicians, while providing interested citizens with a new technology of knowledge as well as a surprisingly effective way to participate in politics. This study focuses on how the presence of blogs has altered the structure of political communication.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Blogs</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Journalists</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Mobilization</subject><subject>News content</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political communication</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Political elites</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Public choice</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0048-5829</issn><issn>1573-7101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGr1TAQhYMoeH36A1wIwYUrq5lp2qQreV59T-GhD9R1SNPpJZc2uSa9iP_e1IqCC12EnCHfmZlwGHsM4gUIoV5mAEBVFVl1KGSl7rAdNKquFAi4y3ZCSF01Grv77EHORyFE3epmx8wH-sb3cT7RQsF5ytwH_obm6JJdvFuf5nPwrhQxvOKvp3jIz_nlgcJg-SdaFh8O3IaB38bJF4Od-K1NRfjTT8tDdm-0U6ZHv-4L9uXq7ef9u-rm4_X7_eVN5WQLS6U70lYPYkDUI_SoXF93rqaeemHLcWiltgSjbBTiiH0_YN_0pFAWBaq-YM-2vqcUv54pL2b22dE02UDxnE3TKd2A6v4L1m3XtFKKAj79CzzGcwrlEwaFQqhbBQWCDXIp5pxoNKfkZ5u-GxBmDcZswZhVrsGYdVXcPLmw4UDpT-N_mZ5spmNeYvo9BVXbaQRZ_wDZzJqG</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Woodly, Deva</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation</title><author>Woodly, Deva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Blogs</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Journalists</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Mobilization</topic><topic>News content</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political communication</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Political elites</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Public choice</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woodly, Deva</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest sociology</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woodly, Deva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation</atitle><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle><stitle>Public Choice</stitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>109-123</pages><issn>0048-5829</issn><eissn>1573-7101</eissn><coden>PUCHBX</coden><abstract>Contrary to initial predictions Internet-mediated forms of communication have not become mediums of mass communication. Traditional media still reach far more people than even the most popular websites. Still, there is evidence that blogs in particular help mobilize opinions, and set the agenda for political elites such as journalists and politicians, while providing interested citizens with a new technology of knowledge as well as a surprisingly effective way to participate in politics. This study focuses on how the presence of blogs has altered the structure of political communication.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-5829 |
ispartof | Public choice, 2008-01, Vol.134 (1/2), p.109-123 |
issn | 0048-5829 1573-7101 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59785179 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Springer Link |
subjects | Bias Blogs Communication Competence Democracy Economics Economics and Finance Hegemony Internet Journalism Journalists Mass Media Mobilization News content News media Objectivity Opinions Participation Political behavior Political communication Political debate Political elites Political participation Political Science Politics Power Public choice Public Finance Studies Websites |
title | New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A53%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Competencies%20in%20Democratic%20Communication?%20Blogs,%20Agenda%20Setting%20and%20Political%20Participation&rft.jtitle=Public%20choice&rft.au=Woodly,%20Deva&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=109-123&rft.issn=0048-5829&rft.eissn=1573-7101&rft.coden=PUCHBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27698214%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207213671&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27698214&rfr_iscdi=true |