Loading…

New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation

Contrary to initial predictions Internet-mediated forms of communication have not become mediums of mass communication. Traditional media still reach far more people than even the most popular websites. Still, there is evidence that blogs in particular help mobilize opinions, and set the agenda for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public choice 2008-01, Vol.134 (1/2), p.109-123
Main Author: Woodly, Deva
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173
container_end_page 123
container_issue 1/2
container_start_page 109
container_title Public choice
container_volume 134
creator Woodly, Deva
description Contrary to initial predictions Internet-mediated forms of communication have not become mediums of mass communication. Traditional media still reach far more people than even the most popular websites. Still, there is evidence that blogs in particular help mobilize opinions, and set the agenda for political elites such as journalists and politicians, while providing interested citizens with a new technology of knowledge as well as a surprisingly effective way to participate in politics. This study focuses on how the presence of blogs has altered the structure of political communication.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59785179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27698214</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27698214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGr1TAQhYMoeH36A1wIwYUrq5lp2qQreV59T-GhD9R1SNPpJZc2uSa9iP_e1IqCC12EnCHfmZlwGHsM4gUIoV5mAEBVFVl1KGSl7rAdNKquFAi4y3ZCSF01Grv77EHORyFE3epmx8wH-sb3cT7RQsF5ytwH_obm6JJdvFuf5nPwrhQxvOKvp3jIz_nlgcJg-SdaFh8O3IaB38bJF4Od-K1NRfjTT8tDdm-0U6ZHv-4L9uXq7ef9u-rm4_X7_eVN5WQLS6U70lYPYkDUI_SoXF93rqaeemHLcWiltgSjbBTiiH0_YN_0pFAWBaq-YM-2vqcUv54pL2b22dE02UDxnE3TKd2A6v4L1m3XtFKKAj79CzzGcwrlEwaFQqhbBQWCDXIp5pxoNKfkZ5u-GxBmDcZswZhVrsGYdVXcPLmw4UDpT-N_mZ5spmNeYvo9BVXbaQRZ_wDZzJqG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207213671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Woodly, Deva</creator><creatorcontrib>Woodly, Deva</creatorcontrib><description>Contrary to initial predictions Internet-mediated forms of communication have not become mediums of mass communication. Traditional media still reach far more people than even the most popular websites. Still, there is evidence that blogs in particular help mobilize opinions, and set the agenda for political elites such as journalists and politicians, while providing interested citizens with a new technology of knowledge as well as a surprisingly effective way to participate in politics. This study focuses on how the presence of blogs has altered the structure of political communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PUCHBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer</publisher><subject>Bias ; Blogs ; Communication ; Competence ; Democracy ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Hegemony ; Internet ; Journalism ; Journalists ; Mass Media ; Mobilization ; News content ; News media ; Objectivity ; Opinions ; Participation ; Political behavior ; Political communication ; Political debate ; Political elites ; Political participation ; Political Science ; Politics ; Power ; Public choice ; Public Finance ; Studies ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Public choice, 2008-01, Vol.134 (1/2), p.109-123</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, BV 2007</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/207213671/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/207213671?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,11906,12845,12847,21387,21394,21395,27924,27925,33223,33224,33611,33612,33985,33986,34530,34531,36050,36051,36060,36061,43733,43948,44115,44361,44363,58238,58471,74221,74468,74639,74893,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woodly, Deva</creatorcontrib><title>New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation</title><title>Public choice</title><addtitle>Public Choice</addtitle><description>Contrary to initial predictions Internet-mediated forms of communication have not become mediums of mass communication. Traditional media still reach far more people than even the most popular websites. Still, there is evidence that blogs in particular help mobilize opinions, and set the agenda for political elites such as journalists and politicians, while providing interested citizens with a new technology of knowledge as well as a surprisingly effective way to participate in politics. This study focuses on how the presence of blogs has altered the structure of political communication.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Blogs</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Journalists</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Mobilization</subject><subject>News content</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political communication</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Political elites</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Public choice</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0048-5829</issn><issn>1573-7101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGr1TAQhYMoeH36A1wIwYUrq5lp2qQreV59T-GhD9R1SNPpJZc2uSa9iP_e1IqCC12EnCHfmZlwGHsM4gUIoV5mAEBVFVl1KGSl7rAdNKquFAi4y3ZCSF01Grv77EHORyFE3epmx8wH-sb3cT7RQsF5ytwH_obm6JJdvFuf5nPwrhQxvOKvp3jIz_nlgcJg-SdaFh8O3IaB38bJF4Od-K1NRfjTT8tDdm-0U6ZHv-4L9uXq7ef9u-rm4_X7_eVN5WQLS6U70lYPYkDUI_SoXF93rqaeemHLcWiltgSjbBTiiH0_YN_0pFAWBaq-YM-2vqcUv54pL2b22dE02UDxnE3TKd2A6v4L1m3XtFKKAj79CzzGcwrlEwaFQqhbBQWCDXIp5pxoNKfkZ5u-GxBmDcZswZhVrsGYdVXcPLmw4UDpT-N_mZ5spmNeYvo9BVXbaQRZ_wDZzJqG</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Woodly, Deva</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation</title><author>Woodly, Deva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Blogs</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Journalists</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Mobilization</topic><topic>News content</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political communication</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Political elites</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Public choice</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woodly, Deva</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest sociology</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woodly, Deva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation</atitle><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle><stitle>Public Choice</stitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>109-123</pages><issn>0048-5829</issn><eissn>1573-7101</eissn><coden>PUCHBX</coden><abstract>Contrary to initial predictions Internet-mediated forms of communication have not become mediums of mass communication. Traditional media still reach far more people than even the most popular websites. Still, there is evidence that blogs in particular help mobilize opinions, and set the agenda for political elites such as journalists and politicians, while providing interested citizens with a new technology of knowledge as well as a surprisingly effective way to participate in politics. This study focuses on how the presence of blogs has altered the structure of political communication.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5829
ispartof Public choice, 2008-01, Vol.134 (1/2), p.109-123
issn 0048-5829
1573-7101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59785179
source EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Springer Link
subjects Bias
Blogs
Communication
Competence
Democracy
Economics
Economics and Finance
Hegemony
Internet
Journalism
Journalists
Mass Media
Mobilization
News content
News media
Objectivity
Opinions
Participation
Political behavior
Political communication
Political debate
Political elites
Political participation
Political Science
Politics
Power
Public choice
Public Finance
Studies
Websites
title New Competencies in Democratic Communication? Blogs, Agenda Setting and Political Participation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A53%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Competencies%20in%20Democratic%20Communication?%20Blogs,%20Agenda%20Setting%20and%20Political%20Participation&rft.jtitle=Public%20choice&rft.au=Woodly,%20Deva&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=109-123&rft.issn=0048-5829&rft.eissn=1573-7101&rft.coden=PUCHBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27698214%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-89e8a8d0d228f1b27cb39c3ebeb0aeb0c2a48ae1f45722f2bbd2b5be724bd2173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207213671&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27698214&rfr_iscdi=true