Loading…
On Government, Governance and Judicial Review: The Case of European Competition Policy
From a traditional rationalist principal-agent framework, the development of the European Community’s competition policy could appear as a straightforward story of agency loss. However, the recent overhaul of competition policy, which the Community presented in terms of decentralisation, appears to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of public policy 2008-04, Vol.28 (1), p.139-159 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-d083a40fa52ebb5e85d9a9ed24a7071ad7e95e5c37ba51e541a9db15c66ff9593 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 159 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Journal of public policy |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | LEHMKUHL, DIRK |
description | From a traditional rationalist principal-agent framework, the development of the European Community’s competition policy could appear as a straightforward story of agency loss. However, the recent overhaul of competition policy, which the Community presented in terms of decentralisation, appears to have changed the story. We are confronted with the uncommon event of an agent (the European Commission) returning some of its powers to the principals (the member states). This paper resolves the puzzle by highlighting the role of the Commission and of European courts. It has become part of the Commission’s strategy to pursue its objectives through legally non-binding instruments such as notices or guidelines or co-operation in networks. These instruments do not need the approval of the Council of Ministers or the European Parliament. With the Commission’s promotion of new modes of governance, the link between sectoral governance (in terms of regulation specific to competition policy) and the governmental shadow of hierarchy shifted to an increasing extent to judicial review by European courts. Alongside this shift, the character of judicial review has changed in the direction of judicial control, as European courts no longer restrict themselves to review of the legality of Commission actions, but also engage in assessing the facts themselves. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0143814X08000810 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59800647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0143814X08000810</cupid><jstor_id>40072039</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40072039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-d083a40fa52ebb5e85d9a9ed24a7071ad7e95e5c37ba51e541a9db15c66ff9593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVoINtNP0APAZFDTnE7siRL6i0smz9lYUualt6MbI8TLba1keyE_fbxsksILSWnGZjfe8O8IeQzgy8MmPr6E5jgmok_oAFAMzggEyYykyjN5Acy2Y6T7fyIfIxxBcD4qJuQ38uOXvknDF2LXX--721XIrVdRb8PlSudbegtPjl8_kbvHpDObETqazofgl-j7ejMt2vsXe98R3_4xpWbY3JY2ybip32dkl-X87vZdbJYXt3MLhZJKbiCpALNrYDayhSLQqKWlbEGq1RYBYrZSqGRKEuuCisZSsGsqQomyyyrayMNn5Kzne86-McBY5-3LpbYNLZDP8RcmjGOTKj3Qa2kzuB9kGcaMmnSETz9C1z5YYyuiTkzciTSVI4Q20Fl8DEGrPN1cK0Nm5xBvn1c_s_jRs3JTrOKvQ-vAgGgUuDbm_ne07ZFcNU9vtn8X9cXTOiieg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195592225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On Government, Governance and Judicial Review: The Case of European Competition Policy</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>LEHMKUHL, DIRK</creator><creatorcontrib>LEHMKUHL, DIRK</creatorcontrib><description>From a traditional rationalist principal-agent framework, the development of the European Community’s competition policy could appear as a straightforward story of agency loss. However, the recent overhaul of competition policy, which the Community presented in terms of decentralisation, appears to have changed the story. We are confronted with the uncommon event of an agent (the European Commission) returning some of its powers to the principals (the member states). This paper resolves the puzzle by highlighting the role of the Commission and of European courts. It has become part of the Commission’s strategy to pursue its objectives through legally non-binding instruments such as notices or guidelines or co-operation in networks. These instruments do not need the approval of the Council of Ministers or the European Parliament. With the Commission’s promotion of new modes of governance, the link between sectoral governance (in terms of regulation specific to competition policy) and the governmental shadow of hierarchy shifted to an increasing extent to judicial review by European courts. Alongside this shift, the character of judicial review has changed in the direction of judicial control, as European courts no longer restrict themselves to review of the legality of Commission actions, but also engage in assessing the facts themselves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-814X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X08000810</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPUPDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agency ; Alliances ; Antitrust ; Commissions ; Competition ; Competition policy ; Courts ; Economic competition ; Economic Policy ; Europe ; European Commission ; European Union ; Governance ; Government ; Judicial Review ; Judicial reviews ; Monopolies ; Policy making ; Principal-Agent Models ; Principal-agent theory ; Regulatory competition ; Review committees ; State aid ; State Intervention ; Supranationalism ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>Journal of public policy, 2008-04, Vol.28 (1), p.139-159</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-d083a40fa52ebb5e85d9a9ed24a7071ad7e95e5c37ba51e541a9db15c66ff9593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/195592225/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/195592225?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12845,12847,21387,21394,27865,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224,33611,33612,33985,33986,36060,36061,43733,43948,44363,58238,58471,72832,74093,74340,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LEHMKUHL, DIRK</creatorcontrib><title>On Government, Governance and Judicial Review: The Case of European Competition Policy</title><title>Journal of public policy</title><addtitle>J. Pub. Pol</addtitle><description>From a traditional rationalist principal-agent framework, the development of the European Community’s competition policy could appear as a straightforward story of agency loss. However, the recent overhaul of competition policy, which the Community presented in terms of decentralisation, appears to have changed the story. We are confronted with the uncommon event of an agent (the European Commission) returning some of its powers to the principals (the member states). This paper resolves the puzzle by highlighting the role of the Commission and of European courts. It has become part of the Commission’s strategy to pursue its objectives through legally non-binding instruments such as notices or guidelines or co-operation in networks. These instruments do not need the approval of the Council of Ministers or the European Parliament. With the Commission’s promotion of new modes of governance, the link between sectoral governance (in terms of regulation specific to competition policy) and the governmental shadow of hierarchy shifted to an increasing extent to judicial review by European courts. Alongside this shift, the character of judicial review has changed in the direction of judicial control, as European courts no longer restrict themselves to review of the legality of Commission actions, but also engage in assessing the facts themselves.</description><subject>Agency</subject><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Antitrust</subject><subject>Commissions</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competition policy</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Commission</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Judicial Review</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Monopolies</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Principal-Agent Models</subject><subject>Principal-agent theory</subject><subject>Regulatory competition</subject><subject>Review committees</subject><subject>State aid</subject><subject>State Intervention</subject><subject>Supranationalism</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>0143-814X</issn><issn>1469-7815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVoINtNP0APAZFDTnE7siRL6i0smz9lYUualt6MbI8TLba1keyE_fbxsksILSWnGZjfe8O8IeQzgy8MmPr6E5jgmok_oAFAMzggEyYykyjN5Acy2Y6T7fyIfIxxBcD4qJuQ38uOXvknDF2LXX--721XIrVdRb8PlSudbegtPjl8_kbvHpDObETqazofgl-j7ejMt2vsXe98R3_4xpWbY3JY2ybip32dkl-X87vZdbJYXt3MLhZJKbiCpALNrYDayhSLQqKWlbEGq1RYBYrZSqGRKEuuCisZSsGsqQomyyyrayMNn5Kzne86-McBY5-3LpbYNLZDP8RcmjGOTKj3Qa2kzuB9kGcaMmnSETz9C1z5YYyuiTkzciTSVI4Q20Fl8DEGrPN1cK0Nm5xBvn1c_s_jRs3JTrOKvQ-vAgGgUuDbm_ne07ZFcNU9vtn8X9cXTOiieg</recordid><startdate>200804</startdate><enddate>200804</enddate><creator>LEHMKUHL, DIRK</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200804</creationdate><title>On Government, Governance and Judicial Review: The Case of European Competition Policy</title><author>LEHMKUHL, DIRK</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-d083a40fa52ebb5e85d9a9ed24a7071ad7e95e5c37ba51e541a9db15c66ff9593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agency</topic><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Antitrust</topic><topic>Commissions</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competition policy</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Commission</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Judicial Review</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Monopolies</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Principal-Agent Models</topic><topic>Principal-agent theory</topic><topic>Regulatory competition</topic><topic>Review committees</topic><topic>State aid</topic><topic>State Intervention</topic><topic>Supranationalism</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LEHMKUHL, DIRK</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LEHMKUHL, DIRK</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On Government, Governance and Judicial Review: The Case of European Competition Policy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public policy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Pub. Pol</addtitle><date>2008-04</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>139-159</pages><issn>0143-814X</issn><eissn>1469-7815</eissn><coden>JPUPDE</coden><abstract>From a traditional rationalist principal-agent framework, the development of the European Community’s competition policy could appear as a straightforward story of agency loss. However, the recent overhaul of competition policy, which the Community presented in terms of decentralisation, appears to have changed the story. We are confronted with the uncommon event of an agent (the European Commission) returning some of its powers to the principals (the member states). This paper resolves the puzzle by highlighting the role of the Commission and of European courts. It has become part of the Commission’s strategy to pursue its objectives through legally non-binding instruments such as notices or guidelines or co-operation in networks. These instruments do not need the approval of the Council of Ministers or the European Parliament. With the Commission’s promotion of new modes of governance, the link between sectoral governance (in terms of regulation specific to competition policy) and the governmental shadow of hierarchy shifted to an increasing extent to judicial review by European courts. Alongside this shift, the character of judicial review has changed in the direction of judicial control, as European courts no longer restrict themselves to review of the legality of Commission actions, but also engage in assessing the facts themselves.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0143814X08000810</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-814X |
ispartof | Journal of public policy, 2008-04, Vol.28 (1), p.139-159 |
issn | 0143-814X 1469-7815 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59800647 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Cambridge Journals Online; Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR |
subjects | Agency Alliances Antitrust Commissions Competition Competition policy Courts Economic competition Economic Policy Europe European Commission European Union Governance Government Judicial Review Judicial reviews Monopolies Policy making Principal-Agent Models Principal-agent theory Regulatory competition Review committees State aid State Intervention Supranationalism Treaties |
title | On Government, Governance and Judicial Review: The Case of European Competition Policy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A28%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20Government,%20Governance%20and%20Judicial%20Review:%20The%20Case%20of%20European%20Competition%20Policy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20policy&rft.au=LEHMKUHL,%20DIRK&rft.date=2008-04&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=139-159&rft.issn=0143-814X&rft.eissn=1469-7815&rft.coden=JPUPDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0143814X08000810&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40072039%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4370-d083a40fa52ebb5e85d9a9ed24a7071ad7e95e5c37ba51e541a9db15c66ff9593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195592225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0143814X08000810&rft_jstor_id=40072039&rfr_iscdi=true |