Loading…
A century of constituency delimitation in India
Constituencies are de jure apportionment of space for the purpose of electing representatives of people living in the territorial limits of a democratic state. The elected representatives represent not only the people but also their respective segments of territory, the constituencies. These two — t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Political geography 2000-05, Vol.19 (4), p.517-532 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-b3cfb8a263f299140c1be16036acb8914e07ea9239707a7c953d741aa4946e7e3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 532 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 517 |
container_title | Political geography |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Singh, Chandra Pal |
description | Constituencies are de jure apportionment of space for the purpose of electing representatives of people living in the territorial limits of a democratic state. The elected representatives represent not only the people but also their respective segments of territory, the constituencies. These two — the land and the people — and the prevailing law of the country provide the basis for constituency boundaries and their delimitation. The laws concerning constituencies can have two dimensions. The first is related to the laws of enfranchisement as to who among the population have the right to vote. This gives the total number of electors and the number of representatives to be elected. The other aspect of constituencies is the actual drawing of boundaries and enclosing people within the constituency framework. This is indeed a sensitive issue for several reasons. First, a lack of understanding of the human geography of the area can divide up people who may in effect lose their representation or voice in the legislature. Second, the division of space into constituencies can be so organised that it may carve out either a safe support base for a party or a candidate, or create a combination of societal forces which are opposed to a particular party or candidate. This task should be assigned to impartial and non-partisan persons. Thirdly, a new boundary can change the pattern of electoral representation in the legislature. The degree of involvement of those who are largely to benefit from it varies from country to country according to its electoral laws. It varies from the largely neutral British case through slight party involvement in New Zealand to the total party involvement in the USA (Gudgin, G. & Taylor, P.J. (1979)
Seats, votes and the spatial organisation of elections (p. 11), Pion Ltd, London). In South Asia, it varies from Sri Lanka where the Delimitation Commission consists purely of persons who are entirely out of politics, to India where the Delimitation Commission comprising of three persons (two of whom have generally been judges of the Supreme Court and State High Courts, and the third member has been the Chief Election Commissioner, ex-officio) associates in its deliberations nine politicians of different political shades in each state. Of these, four belong to the Lok Sabha (lower house of Indian parliament) and five to the Vidhan Sabhas (lower house of state legislatures) (Chandidas, R. (1971) Electoral system and political development. In: L.M. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00090-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59839372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0962629899000906</els_id><sourcerecordid>1791848872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-b3cfb8a263f299140c1be16036acb8914e07ea9239707a7c953d741aa4946e7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QSgIohd1SdMmOVcyhh-DgRfqdUjTU8jo2pmkwv69XSdeeLOrA-c87wvnIeSa0QdGmZi9UxBZKjJQdwD3lFKgqTghE6YkT4vheEomf8g5uQhhPUKSTshsnlhsY-93SVcntmtDdLHH1u6SChu3cdFE17WJa5NlWzlzSc5q0wS8-p1T8vn89LF4TVdvL8vFfJXaPIeYltzWpTKZ4HUGwHJqWYlMUC6MLdWwQCrRQMZBUmmkhYJXMmfG5JALlMin5PbQu_XdV48h6o0LFpvGtNj1QRegOHCZHQW5UkAFkwN48w9cd71vhyc0k8BUrtRYVxwo67sQPNZ6693G-J1mVO9t69G23qvUAHoUqcWQezzkcJDy7dDrYN2gESvn0UZdde5Iww-4JoSU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791848872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A century of constituency delimitation in India</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Singh, Chandra Pal</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Chandra Pal</creatorcontrib><description>Constituencies are de jure apportionment of space for the purpose of electing representatives of people living in the territorial limits of a democratic state. The elected representatives represent not only the people but also their respective segments of territory, the constituencies. These two — the land and the people — and the prevailing law of the country provide the basis for constituency boundaries and their delimitation. The laws concerning constituencies can have two dimensions. The first is related to the laws of enfranchisement as to who among the population have the right to vote. This gives the total number of electors and the number of representatives to be elected. The other aspect of constituencies is the actual drawing of boundaries and enclosing people within the constituency framework. This is indeed a sensitive issue for several reasons. First, a lack of understanding of the human geography of the area can divide up people who may in effect lose their representation or voice in the legislature. Second, the division of space into constituencies can be so organised that it may carve out either a safe support base for a party or a candidate, or create a combination of societal forces which are opposed to a particular party or candidate. This task should be assigned to impartial and non-partisan persons. Thirdly, a new boundary can change the pattern of electoral representation in the legislature. The degree of involvement of those who are largely to benefit from it varies from country to country according to its electoral laws. It varies from the largely neutral British case through slight party involvement in New Zealand to the total party involvement in the USA (Gudgin, G. & Taylor, P.J. (1979)
Seats, votes and the spatial organisation of elections (p. 11), Pion Ltd, London). In South Asia, it varies from Sri Lanka where the Delimitation Commission consists purely of persons who are entirely out of politics, to India where the Delimitation Commission comprising of three persons (two of whom have generally been judges of the Supreme Court and State High Courts, and the third member has been the Chief Election Commissioner, ex-officio) associates in its deliberations nine politicians of different political shades in each state. Of these, four belong to the Lok Sabha (lower house of Indian parliament) and five to the Vidhan Sabhas (lower house of state legislatures) (Chandidas, R. (1971) Electoral system and political development. In: L.M. Singhvi et al.,
Elections and electoral reforms in India (p. 114). Institute of Constitutional and Parliamentary Affairs, New Delhi). But the Commission's verdict is final and can not be challenged even in the Supreme Court. In spite of the involvement of politicians, there have however been no or little reports of gerrymandering in India because of the constitutional safeguards. Nevertheless, it is also a fact that no study of the actual delimitation of constituency boundaries and its effect on electoral outcome and the geography of representation in India could be carried out due to the secrecy and non-availability of delimitation commissions' reports on the actual considerations for delimitation of constituency boundaries.
Even though concepts of democracy, representative institutions, limitations on the arbitrary powers of the rulers, and the rule of law were practised in ancient India, and some of the representatives bodies like
Gram Sanghas, Gram Sabha or
Panchayats have survived up to now (Kashyap, S.C. (1994)
Our constitution (p. 7), National Book Trust of India, New Delhi), the experience of electoral participation in a representative democracy in this country is hardly one century old. In fact, the twentieth century in India could be termed as the century of transformation from being subject of a British colony with no right to elect their own government to the largest democracy in the world. The electoral experience of India can be divided into two parts: selective enfranchisement in the colonial period and universal adult enfranchisement in independent India.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-6298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00090-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Apportionment ; Colonial government ; Constituencies ; Constitution ; Delimitation ; Democracy ; Elections ; Electoral systems ; Enfranchisement ; Geography of representation ; Government and politics ; India ; Legislatures ; Political geography ; Political parties ; Political representation ; Representative democracy ; Territorial constituencies ; Territory ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Political geography, 2000-05, Vol.19 (4), p.517-532</ispartof><rights>2000 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-b3cfb8a263f299140c1be16036acb8914e07ea9239707a7c953d741aa4946e7e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Chandra Pal</creatorcontrib><title>A century of constituency delimitation in India</title><title>Political geography</title><description>Constituencies are de jure apportionment of space for the purpose of electing representatives of people living in the territorial limits of a democratic state. The elected representatives represent not only the people but also their respective segments of territory, the constituencies. These two — the land and the people — and the prevailing law of the country provide the basis for constituency boundaries and their delimitation. The laws concerning constituencies can have two dimensions. The first is related to the laws of enfranchisement as to who among the population have the right to vote. This gives the total number of electors and the number of representatives to be elected. The other aspect of constituencies is the actual drawing of boundaries and enclosing people within the constituency framework. This is indeed a sensitive issue for several reasons. First, a lack of understanding of the human geography of the area can divide up people who may in effect lose their representation or voice in the legislature. Second, the division of space into constituencies can be so organised that it may carve out either a safe support base for a party or a candidate, or create a combination of societal forces which are opposed to a particular party or candidate. This task should be assigned to impartial and non-partisan persons. Thirdly, a new boundary can change the pattern of electoral representation in the legislature. The degree of involvement of those who are largely to benefit from it varies from country to country according to its electoral laws. It varies from the largely neutral British case through slight party involvement in New Zealand to the total party involvement in the USA (Gudgin, G. & Taylor, P.J. (1979)
Seats, votes and the spatial organisation of elections (p. 11), Pion Ltd, London). In South Asia, it varies from Sri Lanka where the Delimitation Commission consists purely of persons who are entirely out of politics, to India where the Delimitation Commission comprising of three persons (two of whom have generally been judges of the Supreme Court and State High Courts, and the third member has been the Chief Election Commissioner, ex-officio) associates in its deliberations nine politicians of different political shades in each state. Of these, four belong to the Lok Sabha (lower house of Indian parliament) and five to the Vidhan Sabhas (lower house of state legislatures) (Chandidas, R. (1971) Electoral system and political development. In: L.M. Singhvi et al.,
Elections and electoral reforms in India (p. 114). Institute of Constitutional and Parliamentary Affairs, New Delhi). But the Commission's verdict is final and can not be challenged even in the Supreme Court. In spite of the involvement of politicians, there have however been no or little reports of gerrymandering in India because of the constitutional safeguards. Nevertheless, it is also a fact that no study of the actual delimitation of constituency boundaries and its effect on electoral outcome and the geography of representation in India could be carried out due to the secrecy and non-availability of delimitation commissions' reports on the actual considerations for delimitation of constituency boundaries.
Even though concepts of democracy, representative institutions, limitations on the arbitrary powers of the rulers, and the rule of law were practised in ancient India, and some of the representatives bodies like
Gram Sanghas, Gram Sabha or
Panchayats have survived up to now (Kashyap, S.C. (1994)
Our constitution (p. 7), National Book Trust of India, New Delhi), the experience of electoral participation in a representative democracy in this country is hardly one century old. In fact, the twentieth century in India could be termed as the century of transformation from being subject of a British colony with no right to elect their own government to the largest democracy in the world. The electoral experience of India can be divided into two parts: selective enfranchisement in the colonial period and universal adult enfranchisement in independent India.</description><subject>Apportionment</subject><subject>Colonial government</subject><subject>Constituencies</subject><subject>Constitution</subject><subject>Delimitation</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral systems</subject><subject>Enfranchisement</subject><subject>Geography of representation</subject><subject>Government and politics</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Political geography</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Representative democracy</subject><subject>Territorial constituencies</subject><subject>Territory</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0962-6298</issn><issn>1873-5096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QSgIohd1SdMmOVcyhh-DgRfqdUjTU8jo2pmkwv69XSdeeLOrA-c87wvnIeSa0QdGmZi9UxBZKjJQdwD3lFKgqTghE6YkT4vheEomf8g5uQhhPUKSTshsnlhsY-93SVcntmtDdLHH1u6SChu3cdFE17WJa5NlWzlzSc5q0wS8-p1T8vn89LF4TVdvL8vFfJXaPIeYltzWpTKZ4HUGwHJqWYlMUC6MLdWwQCrRQMZBUmmkhYJXMmfG5JALlMin5PbQu_XdV48h6o0LFpvGtNj1QRegOHCZHQW5UkAFkwN48w9cd71vhyc0k8BUrtRYVxwo67sQPNZ6693G-J1mVO9t69G23qvUAHoUqcWQezzkcJDy7dDrYN2gESvn0UZdde5Iww-4JoSU</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Singh, Chandra Pal</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Butterworth-Heinemann</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HWXIY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>A century of constituency delimitation in India</title><author>Singh, Chandra Pal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-b3cfb8a263f299140c1be16036acb8914e07ea9239707a7c953d741aa4946e7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Apportionment</topic><topic>Colonial government</topic><topic>Constituencies</topic><topic>Constitution</topic><topic>Delimitation</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral systems</topic><topic>Enfranchisement</topic><topic>Geography of representation</topic><topic>Government and politics</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Political geography</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Representative democracy</topic><topic>Territorial constituencies</topic><topic>Territory</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Chandra Pal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 25</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Political geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Chandra Pal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A century of constituency delimitation in India</atitle><jtitle>Political geography</jtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>517</spage><epage>532</epage><pages>517-532</pages><issn>0962-6298</issn><eissn>1873-5096</eissn><abstract>Constituencies are de jure apportionment of space for the purpose of electing representatives of people living in the territorial limits of a democratic state. The elected representatives represent not only the people but also their respective segments of territory, the constituencies. These two — the land and the people — and the prevailing law of the country provide the basis for constituency boundaries and their delimitation. The laws concerning constituencies can have two dimensions. The first is related to the laws of enfranchisement as to who among the population have the right to vote. This gives the total number of electors and the number of representatives to be elected. The other aspect of constituencies is the actual drawing of boundaries and enclosing people within the constituency framework. This is indeed a sensitive issue for several reasons. First, a lack of understanding of the human geography of the area can divide up people who may in effect lose their representation or voice in the legislature. Second, the division of space into constituencies can be so organised that it may carve out either a safe support base for a party or a candidate, or create a combination of societal forces which are opposed to a particular party or candidate. This task should be assigned to impartial and non-partisan persons. Thirdly, a new boundary can change the pattern of electoral representation in the legislature. The degree of involvement of those who are largely to benefit from it varies from country to country according to its electoral laws. It varies from the largely neutral British case through slight party involvement in New Zealand to the total party involvement in the USA (Gudgin, G. & Taylor, P.J. (1979)
Seats, votes and the spatial organisation of elections (p. 11), Pion Ltd, London). In South Asia, it varies from Sri Lanka where the Delimitation Commission consists purely of persons who are entirely out of politics, to India where the Delimitation Commission comprising of three persons (two of whom have generally been judges of the Supreme Court and State High Courts, and the third member has been the Chief Election Commissioner, ex-officio) associates in its deliberations nine politicians of different political shades in each state. Of these, four belong to the Lok Sabha (lower house of Indian parliament) and five to the Vidhan Sabhas (lower house of state legislatures) (Chandidas, R. (1971) Electoral system and political development. In: L.M. Singhvi et al.,
Elections and electoral reforms in India (p. 114). Institute of Constitutional and Parliamentary Affairs, New Delhi). But the Commission's verdict is final and can not be challenged even in the Supreme Court. In spite of the involvement of politicians, there have however been no or little reports of gerrymandering in India because of the constitutional safeguards. Nevertheless, it is also a fact that no study of the actual delimitation of constituency boundaries and its effect on electoral outcome and the geography of representation in India could be carried out due to the secrecy and non-availability of delimitation commissions' reports on the actual considerations for delimitation of constituency boundaries.
Even though concepts of democracy, representative institutions, limitations on the arbitrary powers of the rulers, and the rule of law were practised in ancient India, and some of the representatives bodies like
Gram Sanghas, Gram Sabha or
Panchayats have survived up to now (Kashyap, S.C. (1994)
Our constitution (p. 7), National Book Trust of India, New Delhi), the experience of electoral participation in a representative democracy in this country is hardly one century old. In fact, the twentieth century in India could be termed as the century of transformation from being subject of a British colony with no right to elect their own government to the largest democracy in the world. The electoral experience of India can be divided into two parts: selective enfranchisement in the colonial period and universal adult enfranchisement in independent India.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00090-6</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-6298 |
ispartof | Political geography, 2000-05, Vol.19 (4), p.517-532 |
issn | 0962-6298 1873-5096 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_59839372 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals; PAIS Index |
subjects | Apportionment Colonial government Constituencies Constitution Delimitation Democracy Elections Electoral systems Enfranchisement Geography of representation Government and politics India Legislatures Political geography Political parties Political representation Representative democracy Territorial constituencies Territory Voting |
title | A century of constituency delimitation in India |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A40%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20century%20of%20constituency%20delimitation%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Political%20geography&rft.au=Singh,%20Chandra%20Pal&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=517&rft.epage=532&rft.pages=517-532&rft.issn=0962-6298&rft.eissn=1873-5096&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00090-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1791848872%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-b3cfb8a263f299140c1be16036acb8914e07ea9239707a7c953d741aa4946e7e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791848872&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |