The EU Comitology System: Intergovernmental Bargaining and Deliberative Supranationalism?

Two images exist of the day‐to‐day practice of the EU comitology system. The first claims that comitology is deliberation by policy experts in which informal norms, deliberation and good arguments matter more than economic interests and formal voting rules. The second image portrays comitology as an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of common market studies 2009-09, Vol.47 (4), p.719-740
Main Authors: BLOM-HANSEN, JENS, BRANDSMA, GIJS JAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bargaining
Commissions
Committees
Delegation
European Union
International Cooperation
Negotiation
Organizational Effectiveness
Policy making
Political ethics
Public Policy
Questionnaires
Studies
Supranationalism
Voting Rules
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two images exist of the day‐to‐day practice of the EU comitology system. The first claims that comitology is deliberation by policy experts in which informal norms, deliberation and good arguments matter more than economic interests and formal voting rules. The second image portrays comitology as an arena for intergovernmental bargaining designed by the Member States to control the Commission. The article systematically investigates these images based on survey evidence from a questionnaire to the Danish and Dutch national representatives on nearly all comitology committees in 2006. The evidence suggests that both images hold and that their relative importance is determined by the nature of the issues dealt with by the individual comitology committees.
ISSN:0021-9886
1468-5965
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.02002.x