Loading…
The Flourishing of Religion in Post-Mao China and the Anthropological Category of Religion
In his provocative critique of Geertz's 1966 definition of religion, Talal Asad (1993) suggests that the very project of defining the category of religion is rooted in the historical rise of Western secularism in societies formerly dominated by Christianity. In post‐Mao China, there has been an...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Australian journal of anthropology 2001-04, Vol.12 (1), p.32-46 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d2fa1d1550057d6add1f0ce0ab5da6957ff3a30299377d46d4d5b97d2163307d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d2fa1d1550057d6add1f0ce0ab5da6957ff3a30299377d46d4d5b97d2163307d3 |
container_end_page | 46 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | The Australian journal of anthropology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Kipnis, Andrew B. |
description | In his provocative critique of Geertz's 1966 definition of religion, Talal Asad (1993) suggests that the very project of defining the category of religion is rooted in the historical rise of Western secularism in societies formerly dominated by Christianity. In post‐Mao China, there has been an explosion of activities that might be categorised as religious in the Geertzian sense, including church attendance, temple building,
qi gong
practice, pilgrimage, and geomancy. This paper examines two such activities, the participation of women in a Protestant church in rural Shandong and the recent protest by members of the Fa Lun Gong (Buddhist Law Qi Gong) society in Beijing, and asks what their emergence in a post‐Maoist communist state tells us about the historical processes that frame the possibility of defining religion. Working with theories of religious participation from Geertz, Asad, Tambiah, and Feuchtwang, the paper develops a conception of ‘symbolic participation’ to illuminate the flourishing of religious practice in post‐Mao China. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1835-9310.2001.tb00061.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60083598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A72299820</galeid><sourcerecordid>A72299820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d2fa1d1550057d6add1f0ce0ab5da6957ff3a30299377d46d4d5b97d2163307d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2LEzEUhgdRcKn7H4ZFxIudmo8mmfGuDLuj2N2VdVXwJqSTzDQ1TWoyhe6_95QW10rB5CLh5DmHc968WXaB0RjDercc45KyoqIQIAjh8TBHCHE83j7LzrBgouBsIp7DHQFWlhi_zM5TskARWhKCyFn242Fh8msXNtGmhfV9Hrr83jjb2-Bz6_PPIQ3FjQp5Da8qV17nA2RM_bCIYR1c6G2rXF6rwfQhPv6d_ip70SmXzPnhHGVfr68e6g_F7K75WE9nRTsR1VBo0imsMWMIMaG50hp3qDVIzZlWvGKi66iiiFQVFUJPuJ5oNq-EJphTioSmo-zNvu46hl8bkwa5sqk1zilvwiZJjhDIVJX_BWkF6lGOAbz4B1yCQB6GkAQTDn0CN8ou91CvnJHWd2GIqu2NN1G54E1nITwVBBovCQK8OIHD1mZl21P82yMekMFsh15tUpJlMztCL0-hbXDO9EaC2PXdEf5-j7cxpBRNJ9fRrlR8lBjJnbHkUu6MJXfGkjtjyYOx5BaSXx-kUQk-vovKtzY9VcAcV0Q8TWsTtPLnWcWfkgsqmPx-28hPX_jtzbfmXjb0N_LW2q0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212605706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Flourishing of Religion in Post-Mao China and the Anthropological Category of Religion</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Kipnis, Andrew B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kipnis, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><description>In his provocative critique of Geertz's 1966 definition of religion, Talal Asad (1993) suggests that the very project of defining the category of religion is rooted in the historical rise of Western secularism in societies formerly dominated by Christianity. In post‐Mao China, there has been an explosion of activities that might be categorised as religious in the Geertzian sense, including church attendance, temple building,
qi gong
practice, pilgrimage, and geomancy. This paper examines two such activities, the participation of women in a Protestant church in rural Shandong and the recent protest by members of the Fa Lun Gong (Buddhist Law Qi Gong) society in Beijing, and asks what their emergence in a post‐Maoist communist state tells us about the historical processes that frame the possibility of defining religion. Working with theories of religious participation from Geertz, Asad, Tambiah, and Feuchtwang, the paper develops a conception of ‘symbolic participation’ to illuminate the flourishing of religious practice in post‐Mao China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1035-8811</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-6547</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-9310.2001.tb00061.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJANE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anthropological research ; Anthropology ; Anthropology of religion ; Buddhism ; China ; Christianity ; Communism ; Consciousness ; Demonstrations & protests ; Ethnology ; Geertz, Clifford ; History ; Peoples Republic of China ; Pilgrimages ; Post-communist societies ; Religion ; Religion Politics Relationship ; Religions ; Religious aspects ; Religious Behavior ; Religious behaviour ; Religious organizations ; Religious Revivalism ; Sources and methods ; Specific concepts ; Tse-tung Mao ; Women</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of anthropology, 2001-04, Vol.12 (1), p.32-46</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Anthropology Society of New South Wales 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d2fa1d1550057d6add1f0ce0ab5da6957ff3a30299377d46d4d5b97d2163307d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d2fa1d1550057d6add1f0ce0ab5da6957ff3a30299377d46d4d5b97d2163307d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/212605706/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/212605706?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,21393,21394,27343,27923,27924,33222,33223,33610,33611,33773,33774,34529,34530,43732,44114,73992,74410</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1161927$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kipnis, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><title>The Flourishing of Religion in Post-Mao China and the Anthropological Category of Religion</title><title>The Australian journal of anthropology</title><addtitle>Australian Journal of Anthropology</addtitle><description>In his provocative critique of Geertz's 1966 definition of religion, Talal Asad (1993) suggests that the very project of defining the category of religion is rooted in the historical rise of Western secularism in societies formerly dominated by Christianity. In post‐Mao China, there has been an explosion of activities that might be categorised as religious in the Geertzian sense, including church attendance, temple building,
qi gong
practice, pilgrimage, and geomancy. This paper examines two such activities, the participation of women in a Protestant church in rural Shandong and the recent protest by members of the Fa Lun Gong (Buddhist Law Qi Gong) society in Beijing, and asks what their emergence in a post‐Maoist communist state tells us about the historical processes that frame the possibility of defining religion. Working with theories of religious participation from Geertz, Asad, Tambiah, and Feuchtwang, the paper develops a conception of ‘symbolic participation’ to illuminate the flourishing of religious practice in post‐Mao China.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anthropological research</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Anthropology of religion</subject><subject>Buddhism</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Communism</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Demonstrations & protests</subject><subject>Ethnology</subject><subject>Geertz, Clifford</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Pilgrimages</subject><subject>Post-communist societies</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion Politics Relationship</subject><subject>Religions</subject><subject>Religious aspects</subject><subject>Religious Behavior</subject><subject>Religious behaviour</subject><subject>Religious organizations</subject><subject>Religious Revivalism</subject><subject>Sources and methods</subject><subject>Specific concepts</subject><subject>Tse-tung Mao</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1035-8811</issn><issn>1757-6547</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2LEzEUhgdRcKn7H4ZFxIudmo8mmfGuDLuj2N2VdVXwJqSTzDQ1TWoyhe6_95QW10rB5CLh5DmHc968WXaB0RjDercc45KyoqIQIAjh8TBHCHE83j7LzrBgouBsIp7DHQFWlhi_zM5TskARWhKCyFn242Fh8msXNtGmhfV9Hrr83jjb2-Bz6_PPIQ3FjQp5Da8qV17nA2RM_bCIYR1c6G2rXF6rwfQhPv6d_ip70SmXzPnhHGVfr68e6g_F7K75WE9nRTsR1VBo0imsMWMIMaG50hp3qDVIzZlWvGKi66iiiFQVFUJPuJ5oNq-EJphTioSmo-zNvu46hl8bkwa5sqk1zilvwiZJjhDIVJX_BWkF6lGOAbz4B1yCQB6GkAQTDn0CN8ou91CvnJHWd2GIqu2NN1G54E1nITwVBBovCQK8OIHD1mZl21P82yMekMFsh15tUpJlMztCL0-hbXDO9EaC2PXdEf5-j7cxpBRNJ9fRrlR8lBjJnbHkUu6MJXfGkjtjyYOx5BaSXx-kUQk-vovKtzY9VcAcV0Q8TWsTtPLnWcWfkgsqmPx-28hPX_jtzbfmXjb0N_LW2q0</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>Kipnis, Andrew B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Australian Anthropological Society</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>The Flourishing of Religion in Post-Mao China and the Anthropological Category of Religion</title><author>Kipnis, Andrew B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d2fa1d1550057d6add1f0ce0ab5da6957ff3a30299377d46d4d5b97d2163307d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anthropological research</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Anthropology of religion</topic><topic>Buddhism</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Communism</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Demonstrations & protests</topic><topic>Ethnology</topic><topic>Geertz, Clifford</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Pilgrimages</topic><topic>Post-communist societies</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion Politics Relationship</topic><topic>Religions</topic><topic>Religious aspects</topic><topic>Religious Behavior</topic><topic>Religious behaviour</topic><topic>Religious organizations</topic><topic>Religious Revivalism</topic><topic>Sources and methods</topic><topic>Specific concepts</topic><topic>Tse-tung Mao</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kipnis, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kipnis, Andrew B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Flourishing of Religion in Post-Mao China and the Anthropological Category of Religion</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of anthropology</jtitle><addtitle>Australian Journal of Anthropology</addtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>32-46</pages><issn>1035-8811</issn><eissn>1757-6547</eissn><coden>AJANE6</coden><abstract>In his provocative critique of Geertz's 1966 definition of religion, Talal Asad (1993) suggests that the very project of defining the category of religion is rooted in the historical rise of Western secularism in societies formerly dominated by Christianity. In post‐Mao China, there has been an explosion of activities that might be categorised as religious in the Geertzian sense, including church attendance, temple building,
qi gong
practice, pilgrimage, and geomancy. This paper examines two such activities, the participation of women in a Protestant church in rural Shandong and the recent protest by members of the Fa Lun Gong (Buddhist Law Qi Gong) society in Beijing, and asks what their emergence in a post‐Maoist communist state tells us about the historical processes that frame the possibility of defining religion. Working with theories of religious participation from Geertz, Asad, Tambiah, and Feuchtwang, the paper develops a conception of ‘symbolic participation’ to illuminate the flourishing of religious practice in post‐Mao China.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1835-9310.2001.tb00061.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1035-8811 |
ispartof | The Australian journal of anthropology, 2001-04, Vol.12 (1), p.32-46 |
issn | 1035-8811 1757-6547 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60083598 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Analysis Anthropological research Anthropology Anthropology of religion Buddhism China Christianity Communism Consciousness Demonstrations & protests Ethnology Geertz, Clifford History Peoples Republic of China Pilgrimages Post-communist societies Religion Religion Politics Relationship Religions Religious aspects Religious Behavior Religious behaviour Religious organizations Religious Revivalism Sources and methods Specific concepts Tse-tung Mao Women |
title | The Flourishing of Religion in Post-Mao China and the Anthropological Category of Religion |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A12%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Flourishing%20of%20Religion%20in%20Post-Mao%20China%20and%20the%20Anthropological%20Category%20of%20Religion&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20anthropology&rft.au=Kipnis,%20Andrew%20B.&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=32-46&rft.issn=1035-8811&rft.eissn=1757-6547&rft.coden=AJANE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1835-9310.2001.tb00061.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA72299820%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d2fa1d1550057d6add1f0ce0ab5da6957ff3a30299377d46d4d5b97d2163307d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212605706&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A72299820&rfr_iscdi=true |