Public Identity in Defining the Boundaries of Public and Private: The Example of Latent Anti-Semitism

The act of communication itself occurs through constant reevaluation of the situation, the goal of which is to develop a consensus about the public or private nature of the communication engaged in. Such evaluation of the private or public nature of an interaction is perhaps the most common example...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social research 2002-03, Vol.69 (1), p.179-194
Main Authors: KOVACS, Andras, MUIZNIEKS, Nils
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Anti-Semitism
Antisemitism
Borders
Communication
Communications
Concentration camps
Cultural identity
Culture
Democratic Process and Nonpublic Politics
Evaluation
Freedom of expression
Frustration
Group identity
Hungary
Identity
Jewish people
Jewish peoples
Latency
Left wing politics
Minority & ethnic groups
Political identity
Political Ideologies
Prejudice
Prejudices
Privacy
Public interest
Public Opinion
Public-Private conflict
Secrecy
Self Expression
Social aspects
Social conditions & trends
Social identity
Social research
Society
Sociology
Sociology of communication and mass media. Sociolinguistics
Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture
Students
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The act of communication itself occurs through constant reevaluation of the situation, the goal of which is to develop a consensus about the public or private nature of the communication engaged in. Such evaluation of the private or public nature of an interaction is perhaps the most common example of defining the borders of public and private spheres.
ISSN:0037-783X
1944-768X
1944-768X
DOI:10.1353/sor.2002.0001