Loading…

Intergovernmental Lobbying for the Passage of TEA-21

This article explains the role of the IGR lobby in the passage of TEA-21 and the nature of the coalitions and partnerships formed by groups within the IGR lobby to accomplish their policy goals. The data for the study are divided into three realms. The first identifies the priorities of groups withi...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Publius 2002, Vol.32 (1), p.45-64
Main Authors:	Marbach, Joseph R., Leckrone, J. Wesley
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Coalitions Federalism Funding Government Government policy Governors Ground transportation Highway transportation Highways Interest Groups Legislation Lobbying Local government Local Politics Political aspects Political science Public Policy State Transportation Transportation policy
Citations:	Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-49da731342447ad305c36922e62a8b7c22384216902af15c6f11aa4a0668fe653
cites
container_end_page	64
container_issue	1
container_start_page	45
container_title	Publius
container_volume	32
creator	Marbach, Joseph R. Leckrone, J. Wesley
description	This article explains the role of the IGR lobby in the passage of TEA-21 and the nature of the coalitions and partnerships formed by groups within the IGR lobby to accomplish their policy goals. The data for the study are divided into three realms. The first identifies the priorities of groups within the IGR lobby and the types of coalitions that groups entered into. These data were gathered through examinations of IGR lobby testimony before congressional committees, interviews with organizational and congressional staff members, and from secondary sources such as the official publications and websites of IGR lobby organizations. The second part seeks to gain a more precise understanding of how state and local officials use non-PIG coalitions and groups to press for their policy objectives by surveying selected state and local government officials. Finally, the survey assesses the impact that IGR lobbying had on TEA-21.
doi_str_mv	10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004934
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60143658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A88108742</galeid><jstor_id>3331073</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A88108742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-49da731342447ad305c36922e62a8b7c22384216902af15c6f11aa4a0668fe653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0s9v0zAUB_AIgUQZ_AcccgFxWIp_xT8OHKpqrBVlm2AgxMV6TZ9DShp3doK2_x6jTEOVKoF8sGR_3rP19M2yV5RMKTH8rb91Pmy2fggdtHG6H9Zb76ZAiDBcPMomVAlVKErU42ySDnVRmpI8zZ7FuCWEcKPVJBPLrsdQ-18Yuh12PbT5yq_Xd01X56l73v_A_ApihBpz7_Lrs1nB6PPsiUsv4ov7_ST78v7ser4oVpfny_lsVVSllH0hzAYUp1wwIRRsOCkrLg1jKBnotaoY41owKg1h4GhZSUcpgAAipXYoS36SvR777oO_GTD2dtfECtsWOvRDtJJQwWWp_wm5oaUyWiZ4OsIaWrRN53wfoKqxwwCt79A16XimNSVaCZZ4cYSntcFdUx3zbw58Ij3e9jUMMdrl54v_pfp8dUBPj9HKty3WaNPI55cH_N3Iq-BjDOjsPjQ7CHeWEvsnOPYwOHYMjr0PTqp_OdZvY-_DQzHnPEWJ_51JE9MvHq4h_LRScVXaxbfvVn78evXhgi3sJ_4bxqTRyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>39157986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intergovernmental Lobbying for the Passage of TEA-21</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Marbach, Joseph R. ; Leckrone, J. Wesley</creator><creatorcontrib>Marbach, Joseph R. ; Leckrone, J. Wesley</creatorcontrib><description>This article explains the role of the IGR lobby in the passage of TEA-21 and the nature of the coalitions and partnerships formed by groups within the IGR lobby to accomplish their policy goals. The data for the study are divided into three realms. The first identifies the priorities of groups within the IGR lobby and the types of coalitions that groups entered into. These data were gathered through examinations of IGR lobby testimony before congressional committees, interviews with organizational and congressional staff members, and from secondary sources such as the official publications and websites of IGR lobby organizations. The second part seeks to gain a more precise understanding of how state and local officials use non-PIG coalitions and groups to press for their policy objectives by surveying selected state and local government officials. Finally, the survey assesses the impact that IGR lobbying had on TEA-21.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004934</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBLSAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Coalitions ; Federalism ; Funding ; Government ; Government policy ; Governors ; Ground transportation ; Highway transportation ; Highways ; Interest Groups ; Legislation ; Lobbying ; Local government ; Local Politics ; Political aspects ; Political science ; Public Policy ; State ; Transportation ; Transportation policy</subject><ispartof>Publius, 2002, Vol.32 (1), p.45-64</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 CSF Associates</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2002 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-49da731342447ad305c36922e62a8b7c22384216902af15c6f11aa4a0668fe653</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3331073$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3331073$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marbach, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leckrone, J. Wesley</creatorcontrib><title>Intergovernmental Lobbying for the Passage of TEA-21</title><title>Publius</title><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><description>This article explains the role of the IGR lobby in the passage of TEA-21 and the nature of the coalitions and partnerships formed by groups within the IGR lobby to accomplish their policy goals. The data for the study are divided into three realms. The first identifies the priorities of groups within the IGR lobby and the types of coalitions that groups entered into. These data were gathered through examinations of IGR lobby testimony before congressional committees, interviews with organizational and congressional staff members, and from secondary sources such as the official publications and websites of IGR lobby organizations. The second part seeks to gain a more precise understanding of how state and local officials use non-PIG coalitions and groups to press for their policy objectives by surveying selected state and local government officials. Finally, the survey assesses the impact that IGR lobbying had on TEA-21.</description><subject>Coalitions</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Ground transportation</subject><subject>Highway transportation</subject><subject>Highways</subject><subject>Interest Groups</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Local Politics</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>State</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Transportation policy</subject><issn>0048-5950</issn><issn>1747-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0s9v0zAUB_AIgUQZ_AcccgFxWIp_xT8OHKpqrBVlm2AgxMV6TZ9DShp3doK2_x6jTEOVKoF8sGR_3rP19M2yV5RMKTH8rb91Pmy2fggdtHG6H9Zb76ZAiDBcPMomVAlVKErU42ySDnVRmpI8zZ7FuCWEcKPVJBPLrsdQ-18Yuh12PbT5yq_Xd01X56l73v_A_ApihBpz7_Lrs1nB6PPsiUsv4ov7_ST78v7ser4oVpfny_lsVVSllH0hzAYUp1wwIRRsOCkrLg1jKBnotaoY41owKg1h4GhZSUcpgAAipXYoS36SvR777oO_GTD2dtfECtsWOvRDtJJQwWWp_wm5oaUyWiZ4OsIaWrRN53wfoKqxwwCt79A16XimNSVaCZZ4cYSntcFdUx3zbw58Ij3e9jUMMdrl54v_pfp8dUBPj9HKty3WaNPI55cH_N3Iq-BjDOjsPjQ7CHeWEvsnOPYwOHYMjr0PTqp_OdZvY-_DQzHnPEWJ_51JE9MvHq4h_LRScVXaxbfvVn78evXhgi3sJ_4bxqTRyw</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Marbach, Joseph R.</creator><creator>Leckrone, J. Wesley</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Robert B. and Helen S. Meyner Center for the Study of State and Local Government and the Center for the Study of Federalism</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>Intergovernmental Lobbying for the Passage of TEA-21</title><author>Marbach, Joseph R. ; Leckrone, J. Wesley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-49da731342447ad305c36922e62a8b7c22384216902af15c6f11aa4a0668fe653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Coalitions</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Ground transportation</topic><topic>Highway transportation</topic><topic>Highways</topic><topic>Interest Groups</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Local Politics</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>State</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Transportation policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marbach, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leckrone, J. Wesley</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Publius</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marbach, Joseph R.</au><au>Leckrone, J. Wesley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intergovernmental Lobbying for the Passage of TEA-21</atitle><jtitle>Publius</jtitle><addtitle>Publius</addtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>45-64</pages><issn>0048-5950</issn><eissn>1747-7107</eissn><coden>PBLSAB</coden><abstract>This article explains the role of the IGR lobby in the passage of TEA-21 and the nature of the coalitions and partnerships formed by groups within the IGR lobby to accomplish their policy goals. The data for the study are divided into three realms. The first identifies the priorities of groups within the IGR lobby and the types of coalitions that groups entered into. These data were gathered through examinations of IGR lobby testimony before congressional committees, interviews with organizational and congressional staff members, and from secondary sources such as the official publications and websites of IGR lobby organizations. The second part seeks to gain a more precise understanding of how state and local officials use non-PIG coalitions and groups to press for their policy objectives by surveying selected state and local government officials. Finally, the survey assesses the impact that IGR lobbying had on TEA-21.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004934</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0048-5950
ispartof	Publius, 2002, Vol.32 (1), p.45-64
issn	0048-5950 1747-7107
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60143658
source	International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Oxford Journals Online
subjects	Coalitions Federalism Funding Government Government policy Governors Ground transportation Highway transportation Highways Interest Groups Legislation Lobbying Local government Local Politics Political aspects Political science Public Policy State Transportation Transportation policy
title	Intergovernmental Lobbying for the Passage of TEA-21
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A13%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intergovernmental%20Lobbying%20for%20the%20Passage%20of%20TEA-21&rft.jtitle=Publius&rft.au=Marbach,%20Joseph%20R.&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=45-64&rft.issn=0048-5950&rft.eissn=1747-7107&rft.coden=PBLSAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004934&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA88108742%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-49da731342447ad305c36922e62a8b7c22384216902af15c6f11aa4a0668fe653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=39157986&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A88108742&rft_jstor_id=3331073&rfr_iscdi=true