Commentary: A Response to Doug Jones

Wildcat et al comment on Doug Jones' proposed use of kinship systems as criterion for human "prehistory." They add that the definition of social structure that is associated with Jones' analyses is terribly simplistic and reified.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American anthropologist 2004-09, Vol.106 (3), p.641-641
Main Authors: Wildcat, Daniel, Sumi, Irena, Deloria, Vine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Commentaries
Cultural anthropology
Cultural history
Genealogy
Genetics
Human genetics
Humanity
Interpersonal relations
Jones, Doug
Kinship
Prehistoric era
Social sciences
Social structure
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3691-95fb5feaeb9e94d6972ac2231110c73156dd33906d7f163222a14320f95cb53c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3691-95fb5feaeb9e94d6972ac2231110c73156dd33906d7f163222a14320f95cb53c3
container_end_page 641
container_issue 3
container_start_page 641
container_title American anthropologist
container_volume 106
creator Wildcat, Daniel
Sumi, Irena
Deloria, Vine
description Wildcat et al comment on Doug Jones' proposed use of kinship systems as criterion for human "prehistory." They add that the definition of social structure that is associated with Jones' analyses is terribly simplistic and reified.
doi_str_mv 10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.641
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60292081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3567661</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3567661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3691-95fb5feaeb9e94d6972ac2231110c73156dd33906d7f163222a14320f95cb53c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMouH78AYKHIuKtNZNp0o23sn6zKoieQzZNZZe2WZMW2f_eLBUPXoSB4cH7DW8eISdAM-CMX2qdMUrzDKjIMBM57JAJ8HyaQo64SyaUUpYWTOb75CCEVZSFQD4h5zPXtrbrtd9cJWXyasPadcEmvUuu3fCRPLrOhiOyV-sm2OOffUjeb2_eZvfp_OXuYVbOU4NCQip5veC11XYhrcwrIQumDWMIANQUCFxUFaKkoipqEMgY0zEdo7XkZsHR4CG5GO-uvfscbOhVuwzGNo3urBuCEpRJRqcQjWd_jCs3-C5mUyCncTjwaILRZLwLwdtarf2yjY8qoGpbmtJabUuLWihUsbTIiJH5WjZ28z-gyqfyeQRPR3AVeud_QeSiEALwG8wzdcU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198198515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commentary: A Response to Doug Jones</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Wiley</source><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Wildcat, Daniel ; Sumi, Irena ; Deloria, Vine</creator><creatorcontrib>Wildcat, Daniel ; Sumi, Irena ; Deloria, Vine</creatorcontrib><description>Wildcat et al comment on Doug Jones' proposed use of kinship systems as criterion for human "prehistory." They add that the definition of social structure that is associated with Jones' analyses is terribly simplistic and reified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-1433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.641</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMATA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: American Anthropological Association</publisher><subject>Commentaries ; Cultural anthropology ; Cultural history ; Genealogy ; Genetics ; Human genetics ; Humanity ; Interpersonal relations ; Jones, Doug ; Kinship ; Prehistoric era ; Social sciences ; Social structure</subject><ispartof>American anthropologist, 2004-09, Vol.106 (3), p.641-641</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 American Anthropological Association</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Sep 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3691-95fb5feaeb9e94d6972ac2231110c73156dd33906d7f163222a14320f95cb53c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3691-95fb5feaeb9e94d6972ac2231110c73156dd33906d7f163222a14320f95cb53c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198198515/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198198515?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,12861,21394,21395,27344,27924,27925,33223,33611,33612,33774,33775,34530,34531,34775,34776,43733,44115,44200,58238,58471,62661,62662,62664,62677,74068,74093,74511,74600</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wildcat, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumi, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deloria, Vine</creatorcontrib><title>Commentary: A Response to Doug Jones</title><title>American anthropologist</title><description>Wildcat et al comment on Doug Jones' proposed use of kinship systems as criterion for human "prehistory." They add that the definition of social structure that is associated with Jones' analyses is terribly simplistic and reified.</description><subject>Commentaries</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Cultural history</subject><subject>Genealogy</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Human genetics</subject><subject>Humanity</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Jones, Doug</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Prehistoric era</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><issn>0002-7294</issn><issn>1548-1433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMouH78AYKHIuKtNZNp0o23sn6zKoieQzZNZZe2WZMW2f_eLBUPXoSB4cH7DW8eISdAM-CMX2qdMUrzDKjIMBM57JAJ8HyaQo64SyaUUpYWTOb75CCEVZSFQD4h5zPXtrbrtd9cJWXyasPadcEmvUuu3fCRPLrOhiOyV-sm2OOffUjeb2_eZvfp_OXuYVbOU4NCQip5veC11XYhrcwrIQumDWMIANQUCFxUFaKkoipqEMgY0zEdo7XkZsHR4CG5GO-uvfscbOhVuwzGNo3urBuCEpRJRqcQjWd_jCs3-C5mUyCncTjwaILRZLwLwdtarf2yjY8qoGpbmtJabUuLWihUsbTIiJH5WjZ28z-gyqfyeQRPR3AVeud_QeSiEALwG8wzdcU</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>Wildcat, Daniel</creator><creator>Sumi, Irena</creator><creator>Deloria, Vine</creator><general>American Anthropological Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>Commentary: A Response to Doug Jones</title><author>Wildcat, Daniel ; Sumi, Irena ; Deloria, Vine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3691-95fb5feaeb9e94d6972ac2231110c73156dd33906d7f163222a14320f95cb53c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Commentaries</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Cultural history</topic><topic>Genealogy</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Human genetics</topic><topic>Humanity</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Jones, Doug</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Prehistoric era</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wildcat, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumi, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deloria, Vine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Social Science Journals (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>American anthropologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wildcat, Daniel</au><au>Sumi, Irena</au><au>Deloria, Vine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commentary: A Response to Doug Jones</atitle><jtitle>American anthropologist</jtitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>641</epage><pages>641-641</pages><issn>0002-7294</issn><eissn>1548-1433</eissn><coden>AMATA7</coden><abstract>Wildcat et al comment on Doug Jones' proposed use of kinship systems as criterion for human "prehistory." They add that the definition of social structure that is associated with Jones' analyses is terribly simplistic and reified.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>American Anthropological Association</pub><doi>10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.641</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7294
ispartof American anthropologist, 2004-09, Vol.106 (3), p.641-641
issn 0002-7294
1548-1433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60292081
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Wiley; Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; ProQuest One Literature; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR
subjects Commentaries
Cultural anthropology
Cultural history
Genealogy
Genetics
Human genetics
Humanity
Interpersonal relations
Jones, Doug
Kinship
Prehistoric era
Social sciences
Social structure
title Commentary: A Response to Doug Jones
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A59%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commentary:%20A%20Response%20to%20Doug%20Jones&rft.jtitle=American%20anthropologist&rft.au=Wildcat,%20Daniel&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=641&rft.pages=641-641&rft.issn=0002-7294&rft.eissn=1548-1433&rft.coden=AMATA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/aa.2004.106.3.641&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3567661%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3691-95fb5feaeb9e94d6972ac2231110c73156dd33906d7f163222a14320f95cb53c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198198515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3567661&rfr_iscdi=true