The aesthetic discourse space of popular music: 1985–86 and 2004–05

This article presents a comparison of the aesthetic classification system of popular music, as employed by newspaper critics in the Los Angeles Times during 1985–86 and 2004–05. Through a relational discourse analysis of popular music album reviews, which applies the ecological technique of measurin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Poetics (Amsterdam) 2009-08, Vol.37 (4), p.315-332
Main Author: van Venrooij, Alex
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Discourse Analysis
Environmental Factors
Los Angeles, California
Music
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article presents a comparison of the aesthetic classification system of popular music, as employed by newspaper critics in the Los Angeles Times during 1985–86 and 2004–05. Through a relational discourse analysis of popular music album reviews, which applies the ecological technique of measuring niche spaces occupied by genres in an ‘aesthetic discourse space’, the genre structure of popular music is compared across a time period in which the field of popular music has arguably undergone a growing ‘isomorphism’ of aesthetic principles and a blurring of boundaries between genres. Comparison of genre structures at two points in time suggests that the perception and interpretation of diverse genres has become more similar. Moreover, the boundary between two exemplary genres – rock music and pop music – has apparently become less salient for music critics, possibly signaling a weakening of commercial boundaries within the popular music field over the last two decades.
ISSN:0304-422X
1872-7514
DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.06.005