Loading…

Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge

In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on 'consensusing' and the expectation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social studies of science 2010-02, Vol.40 (1), p.105-126
Main Authors: Horst, Maja, Irwin, Alan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1200-8f442c8aacd0f7ecd0d42f117b48eafc4eb7dba2fc4624408c176ba988c79b553
cites
container_end_page 126
container_issue 1
container_start_page 105
container_title Social studies of science
container_volume 40
creator Horst, Maja
Irwin, Alan
description In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on 'consensusing' and the expectation of consensus, and consider both their roots and their performative consequences. We argue that consensus should be seen not simply as the absence of disagreement, but as a particular political and ideological formation. We consider and explore the Danish model based on the folkelig concept of the common good, before turning to the wider European movement towards consensus-building. As presented here, consensusing becomes a focus for political contestation but also for nation- and institution-building. Rather than evaluating deliberation solely in terms of its short-term instrumental effects, consensusing should also be understood as performative of national and international identity. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0306312709341500
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60354428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60354428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1200-8f442c8aacd0f7ecd0d42f117b48eafc4eb7dba2fc4624408c176ba988c79b553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjjtPAzEQhF2ARAj0lK7SHazfvhJF4SEikKJQR2t7DYfMHeCL8ve5CJqZ0VfMDGNXAq6FcO4GFFglpINWaWEATtjsiJojO2PntX4AgHPGztjiGcdu6CvHka-wEj904zvfYOoiFv7UD4dC6Y0u2GnGUuny3-fs9W61XT4065f7x-XtuolCAjQ-ay2jR4wJsqNJk5Z5-hS0J8xRU3ApoJySlVqDj8LZgK330bXBGDVni7_er5_he0913H12NVIp2NOwrzsLykwTXv0CGZhBHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60354428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Horst, Maja ; Irwin, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Horst, Maja ; Irwin, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on 'consensusing' and the expectation of consensus, and consider both their roots and their performative consequences. We argue that consensus should be seen not simply as the absence of disagreement, but as a particular political and ideological formation. We consider and explore the Danish model based on the folkelig concept of the common good, before turning to the wider European movement towards consensus-building. As presented here, consensusing becomes a focus for political contestation but also for nation- and institution-building. Rather than evaluating deliberation solely in terms of its short-term instrumental effects, consensusing should also be understood as performative of national and international identity. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-3127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0306312709341500</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSTSD2</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Consensus ; Denmark ; Europe ; Identity ; Knowledge ; Technological Change</subject><ispartof>Social studies of science, 2010-02, Vol.40 (1), p.105-126</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1200-8f442c8aacd0f7ecd0d42f117b48eafc4eb7dba2fc4624408c176ba988c79b553</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horst, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge</title><title>Social studies of science</title><description>In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on 'consensusing' and the expectation of consensus, and consider both their roots and their performative consequences. We argue that consensus should be seen not simply as the absence of disagreement, but as a particular political and ideological formation. We consider and explore the Danish model based on the folkelig concept of the common good, before turning to the wider European movement towards consensus-building. As presented here, consensusing becomes a focus for political contestation but also for nation- and institution-building. Rather than evaluating deliberation solely in terms of its short-term instrumental effects, consensusing should also be understood as performative of national and international identity. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]</description><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Technological Change</subject><issn>0306-3127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNotjjtPAzEQhF2ARAj0lK7SHazfvhJF4SEikKJQR2t7DYfMHeCL8ve5CJqZ0VfMDGNXAq6FcO4GFFglpINWaWEATtjsiJojO2PntX4AgHPGztjiGcdu6CvHka-wEj904zvfYOoiFv7UD4dC6Y0u2GnGUuny3-fs9W61XT4065f7x-XtuolCAjQ-ay2jR4wJsqNJk5Z5-hS0J8xRU3ApoJySlVqDj8LZgK330bXBGDVni7_er5_he0913H12NVIp2NOwrzsLykwTXv0CGZhBHQ</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Horst, Maja</creator><creator>Irwin, Alan</creator><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge</title><author>Horst, Maja ; Irwin, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1200-8f442c8aacd0f7ecd0d42f117b48eafc4eb7dba2fc4624408c176ba988c79b553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Technological Change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horst, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social studies of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horst, Maja</au><au>Irwin, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Social studies of science</jtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>105-126</pages><issn>0306-3127</issn><coden>SSTSD2</coden><abstract>In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on 'consensusing' and the expectation of consensus, and consider both their roots and their performative consequences. We argue that consensus should be seen not simply as the absence of disagreement, but as a particular political and ideological formation. We consider and explore the Danish model based on the folkelig concept of the common good, before turning to the wider European movement towards consensus-building. As presented here, consensusing becomes a focus for political contestation but also for nation- and institution-building. Rather than evaluating deliberation solely in terms of its short-term instrumental effects, consensusing should also be understood as performative of national and international identity. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]</abstract><doi>10.1177/0306312709341500</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-3127
ispartof Social studies of science, 2010-02, Vol.40 (1), p.105-126
issn 0306-3127
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60354428
source JSTOR Archival Journals; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Consensus
Denmark
Europe
Identity
Knowledge
Technological Change
title Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A29%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nations%20at%20Ease%20with%20Radical%20Knowledge&rft.jtitle=Social%20studies%20of%20science&rft.au=Horst,%20Maja&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=105-126&rft.issn=0306-3127&rft.coden=SSTSD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0306312709341500&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60354428%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1200-8f442c8aacd0f7ecd0d42f117b48eafc4eb7dba2fc4624408c176ba988c79b553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60354428&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true