Loading…
Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge
In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on 'consensusing' and the expectation...
Saved in:
Published in: | Social studies of science 2010-02, Vol.40 (1), p.105-126 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1200-8f442c8aacd0f7ecd0d42f117b48eafc4eb7dba2fc4624408c176ba988c79b553 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 126 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Social studies of science |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Horst, Maja Irwin, Alan |
description | In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on 'consensusing' and the expectation of consensus, and consider both their roots and their performative consequences. We argue that consensus should be seen not simply as the absence of disagreement, but as a particular political and ideological formation. We consider and explore the Danish model based on the folkelig concept of the common good, before turning to the wider European movement towards consensus-building. As presented here, consensusing becomes a focus for political contestation but also for nation- and institution-building. Rather than evaluating deliberation solely in terms of its short-term instrumental effects, consensusing should also be understood as performative of national and international identity. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0306312709341500 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60354428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60354428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1200-8f442c8aacd0f7ecd0d42f117b48eafc4eb7dba2fc4624408c176ba988c79b553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjjtPAzEQhF2ARAj0lK7SHazfvhJF4SEikKJQR2t7DYfMHeCL8ve5CJqZ0VfMDGNXAq6FcO4GFFglpINWaWEATtjsiJojO2PntX4AgHPGztjiGcdu6CvHka-wEj904zvfYOoiFv7UD4dC6Y0u2GnGUuny3-fs9W61XT4065f7x-XtuolCAjQ-ay2jR4wJsqNJk5Z5-hS0J8xRU3ApoJySlVqDj8LZgK330bXBGDVni7_er5_he0913H12NVIp2NOwrzsLykwTXv0CGZhBHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60354428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Horst, Maja ; Irwin, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Horst, Maja ; Irwin, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on 'consensusing' and the expectation of consensus, and consider both their roots and their performative consequences. We argue that consensus should be seen not simply as the absence of disagreement, but as a particular political and ideological formation. We consider and explore the Danish model based on the folkelig concept of the common good, before turning to the wider European movement towards consensus-building. As presented here, consensusing becomes a focus for political contestation but also for nation- and institution-building. Rather than evaluating deliberation solely in terms of its short-term instrumental effects, consensusing should also be understood as performative of national and international identity. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-3127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0306312709341500</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSTSD2</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Consensus ; Denmark ; Europe ; Identity ; Knowledge ; Technological Change</subject><ispartof>Social studies of science, 2010-02, Vol.40 (1), p.105-126</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1200-8f442c8aacd0f7ecd0d42f117b48eafc4eb7dba2fc4624408c176ba988c79b553</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horst, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge</title><title>Social studies of science</title><description>In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on 'consensusing' and the expectation of consensus, and consider both their roots and their performative consequences. We argue that consensus should be seen not simply as the absence of disagreement, but as a particular political and ideological formation. We consider and explore the Danish model based on the folkelig concept of the common good, before turning to the wider European movement towards consensus-building. As presented here, consensusing becomes a focus for political contestation but also for nation- and institution-building. Rather than evaluating deliberation solely in terms of its short-term instrumental effects, consensusing should also be understood as performative of national and international identity. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]</description><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Technological Change</subject><issn>0306-3127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNotjjtPAzEQhF2ARAj0lK7SHazfvhJF4SEikKJQR2t7DYfMHeCL8ve5CJqZ0VfMDGNXAq6FcO4GFFglpINWaWEATtjsiJojO2PntX4AgHPGztjiGcdu6CvHka-wEj904zvfYOoiFv7UD4dC6Y0u2GnGUuny3-fs9W61XT4065f7x-XtuolCAjQ-ay2jR4wJsqNJk5Z5-hS0J8xRU3ApoJySlVqDj8LZgK330bXBGDVni7_er5_he0913H12NVIp2NOwrzsLykwTXv0CGZhBHQ</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Horst, Maja</creator><creator>Irwin, Alan</creator><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge</title><author>Horst, Maja ; Irwin, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1200-8f442c8aacd0f7ecd0d42f117b48eafc4eb7dba2fc4624408c176ba988c79b553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Technological Change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horst, Maja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social studies of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horst, Maja</au><au>Irwin, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Social studies of science</jtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>105-126</pages><issn>0306-3127</issn><coden>SSTSD2</coden><abstract>In response to the recent troubled history of risk-related technological development in Europe, one institutional reaction has been to advocate public deliberation as a means of achieving broad societal consensus over socio-scientific futures. We focus on 'consensusing' and the expectation of consensus, and consider both their roots and their performative consequences. We argue that consensus should be seen not simply as the absence of disagreement, but as a particular political and ideological formation. We consider and explore the Danish model based on the folkelig concept of the common good, before turning to the wider European movement towards consensus-building. As presented here, consensusing becomes a focus for political contestation but also for nation- and institution-building. Rather than evaluating deliberation solely in terms of its short-term instrumental effects, consensusing should also be understood as performative of national and international identity. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]</abstract><doi>10.1177/0306312709341500</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-3127 |
ispartof | Social studies of science, 2010-02, Vol.40 (1), p.105-126 |
issn | 0306-3127 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60354428 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
subjects | Consensus Denmark Europe Identity Knowledge Technological Change |
title | Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A29%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nations%20at%20Ease%20with%20Radical%20Knowledge&rft.jtitle=Social%20studies%20of%20science&rft.au=Horst,%20Maja&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=105-126&rft.issn=0306-3127&rft.coden=SSTSD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0306312709341500&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60354428%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1200-8f442c8aacd0f7ecd0d42f117b48eafc4eb7dba2fc4624408c176ba988c79b553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60354428&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |