Loading…

The Role Demands and Dilemmas of Minority Public Administrators: The Herbert Thesis Revisited

How has the situation of the minority public administrator changed over the past two decades? In 1974, PAR published a symposium titled, "Minorities in Public Administration." Adam W. Herbert, the symposium's editor, contributed an article that identified the role demands and dilemmas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public administration review 1994-09, Vol.54 (5), p.409-417
Main Authors: Murray, Sylvester, Terry, Larry D., Washington, Charles A., Keller, Lawrence F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:How has the situation of the minority public administrator changed over the past two decades? In 1974, PAR published a symposium titled, "Minorities in Public Administration." Adam W. Herbert, the symposium's editor, contributed an article that identified the role demands and dilemmas of minority public administrators. Herbert painted a picture of a minority administrator who is confined to "social service agencies," held hostage by several powerful forces beyond his or her control. Has this portrait of minority administrators changed in the last 20 years? How do minority public administrators view themselves in relation to the demands discussed by Herbert? Do they perceive themselves as innocent victims or legitimate participants in statecraft? To answer these questions and more, Sylvester Murray and his colleagues at Cleveland State University surveyed members of the Conference of Minority Public Administrators (a section of the American Society for Public Administration). The authors found that significant changes have occurred since Herbert published his essay. Minorities have made impressive gains in securing upper-level management positions in federal administrative agencies. Minority administrators are also taking a more proactive position in dealing with the forces and demands discussed by Herbert.
ISSN:0033-3352
1540-6210
DOI:10.2307/976425