Relativism versus realism - all but a specious dichotomy

Hibberd brings to light two points that remain unclear in Gregor McLennan's article "'Thus': Reflections on Loughborough Relativism." He attempts to clarify the confusion that the Edwards-Parker exchange perpetuated as neither party made clear what they meant by the term &qu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:History of the human sciences 2001-08, Vol.14 (3), p.102-107
Main Author: Hibberd, Fiona J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Critical realism
Methodology (Philosophical)
Philosophy
Realism
Realism (Philosophy)
Relativism
Rhetoric
Social sciences
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a3ee71ebd4c245bccae416dba5769c4f401c4fa2ad68bb5a568e89383bf014da3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a3ee71ebd4c245bccae416dba5769c4f401c4fa2ad68bb5a568e89383bf014da3
container_end_page 107
container_issue 3
container_start_page 102
container_title History of the human sciences
container_volume 14
creator Hibberd, Fiona J.
description Hibberd brings to light two points that remain unclear in Gregor McLennan's article "'Thus': Reflections on Loughborough Relativism." He attempts to clarify the confusion that the Edwards-Parker exchange perpetuated as neither party made clear what they meant by the term "relativism."
doi_str_mv 10.1177/09526950122121023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60412703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_09526950122121023</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57531681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a3ee71ebd4c245bccae416dba5769c4f401c4fa2ad68bb5a568e89383bf014da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLfgwVvqzmY_kqMUv6AgiIK3MNlMNGXT1N2k0H_vlnoQRbzMMLzP-zIzjJ0DnwEYc8ULJXShOAgBArjIDtgEpIbUCP56yCY7PY0AHLOTEJacc8klTFj-RA6HdtOGLtmQD2NIPKHbjWmCziXVOCSYhDXZto9i3dr3fui77Sk7atAFOvvqU_Zye_M8v08Xj3cP8-tFaqUQQ4oZkQGqammFVJW1SBJ0XaEyurCykRxiRYG1zqtKodI55UWWZ1XDQdaYTdnlPnft-4-RwlB2bbDkHK4oLlTqeIYwPPsXVEZloHOI4MUPcNmPfhWPKKGQBRgFMkKwh6zvQ_DUlGvfdui3JfBy9_Hy18ejZ7b3BHyjb6F_Gj4BXJd_Uw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194917514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relativism versus realism - all but a specious dichotomy</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Humanities Index</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hibberd, Fiona J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hibberd, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><description>Hibberd brings to light two points that remain unclear in Gregor McLennan's article "'Thus': Reflections on Loughborough Relativism." He attempts to clarify the confusion that the Edwards-Parker exchange perpetuated as neither party made clear what they meant by the term "relativism."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-6951</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-720X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/09526950122121023</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HHSCEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Critical realism ; Methodology (Philosophical) ; Philosophy ; Realism ; Realism (Philosophy) ; Relativism ; Rhetoric ; Social sciences</subject><ispartof>History of the human sciences, 2001-08, Vol.14 (3), p.102-107</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Aug 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a3ee71ebd4c245bccae416dba5769c4f401c4fa2ad68bb5a568e89383bf014da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a3ee71ebd4c245bccae416dba5769c4f401c4fa2ad68bb5a568e89383bf014da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000,33223,33774,33775,33849,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hibberd, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><title>Relativism versus realism - all but a specious dichotomy</title><title>History of the human sciences</title><description>Hibberd brings to light two points that remain unclear in Gregor McLennan's article "'Thus': Reflections on Loughborough Relativism." He attempts to clarify the confusion that the Edwards-Parker exchange perpetuated as neither party made clear what they meant by the term "relativism."</description><subject>Critical realism</subject><subject>Methodology (Philosophical)</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Realism (Philosophy)</subject><subject>Relativism</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><issn>0952-6951</issn><issn>1461-720X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>C18</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLfgwVvqzmY_kqMUv6AgiIK3MNlMNGXT1N2k0H_vlnoQRbzMMLzP-zIzjJ0DnwEYc8ULJXShOAgBArjIDtgEpIbUCP56yCY7PY0AHLOTEJacc8klTFj-RA6HdtOGLtmQD2NIPKHbjWmCziXVOCSYhDXZto9i3dr3fui77Sk7atAFOvvqU_Zye_M8v08Xj3cP8-tFaqUQQ4oZkQGqammFVJW1SBJ0XaEyurCykRxiRYG1zqtKodI55UWWZ1XDQdaYTdnlPnft-4-RwlB2bbDkHK4oLlTqeIYwPPsXVEZloHOI4MUPcNmPfhWPKKGQBRgFMkKwh6zvQ_DUlGvfdui3JfBy9_Hy18ejZ7b3BHyjb6F_Gj4BXJd_Uw</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Hibberd, Fiona J.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Relativism versus realism - all but a specious dichotomy</title><author>Hibberd, Fiona J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a3ee71ebd4c245bccae416dba5769c4f401c4fa2ad68bb5a568e89383bf014da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Critical realism</topic><topic>Methodology (Philosophical)</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Realism (Philosophy)</topic><topic>Relativism</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hibberd, Fiona J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>History of the human sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hibberd, Fiona J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relativism versus realism - all but a specious dichotomy</atitle><jtitle>History of the human sciences</jtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>102-107</pages><issn>0952-6951</issn><eissn>1461-720X</eissn><coden>HHSCEO</coden><abstract>Hibberd brings to light two points that remain unclear in Gregor McLennan's article "'Thus': Reflections on Loughborough Relativism." He attempts to clarify the confusion that the Edwards-Parker exchange perpetuated as neither party made clear what they meant by the term "relativism."</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/09526950122121023</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-6951
ispartof History of the human sciences, 2001-08, Vol.14 (3), p.102-107
issn 0952-6951
1461-720X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60412703
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Humanities Index; Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Critical realism
Methodology (Philosophical)
Philosophy
Realism
Realism (Philosophy)
Relativism
Rhetoric
Social sciences
title Relativism versus realism - all but a specious dichotomy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A45%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relativism%20versus%20realism%20-%20all%20but%20a%20specious%20dichotomy&rft.jtitle=History%20of%20the%20human%20sciences&rft.au=Hibberd,%20Fiona%20J.&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=102-107&rft.issn=0952-6951&rft.eissn=1461-720X&rft.coden=HHSCEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/09526950122121023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57531681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a3ee71ebd4c245bccae416dba5769c4f401c4fa2ad68bb5a568e89383bf014da3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194917514&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_09526950122121023&rfr_iscdi=true