Loading…
THE DILEMMA OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY
The US does not need a reserve of nuclear weapons to take the offensive. Approximately 200 nuclear warheads will suffice for deterrence and retaliation, and the US has had an arsenal of 32,500 weapons since 1969.
Saved in:
Published in: | Naval War College review 2001-03, Vol.54 (2), p.13-23 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 23 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | Naval War College review |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Turner, Stansfield |
description | The US does not need a reserve of nuclear weapons to take the offensive. Approximately 200 nuclear warheads will suffice for deterrence and retaliation, and the US has had an arsenal of 32,500 weapons since 1969. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60421270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A77034452</galeid><sourcerecordid>A77034452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1640-d09edd29db9884087208dcbd463137f17c186871b9ba074b44b4c8641a2a85193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNz1FrgzAQAOAwNljX7T-EPexpgSSeJu5NnF0Fa0drKX2SaGKxWN20_v-ldE_bHkYOcnd83HFXaMJBuERQENdoQimXhIGEW3Q3DAd6rn1ngl6yeYRf4yRaLAK8nOF0EyZRsMLbKHhfpmscp_gssm2UZjsyi1frDIc236x29-imUs1gHr7_KdrMoiyck2T5FodBQvbMA0o09Y3W3NeFLyVQKTiVuiw0eA5zRMVEyaQnBSv8QlEBBdgopQdMcSVd5jtT9HSZ-9F3n6MZTvmxHkrTNKo13TjkHgXOuKD_gI49G7iFjz_goRv71h6Rc-r6XABzLXq-oL1qTF63VXfqVbk3relV07Wmqm07EHYvgHueSf7g9mlzrMvf_guTQXY3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205927415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE DILEMMA OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Turner, Stansfield</creator><creatorcontrib>Turner, Stansfield</creatorcontrib><description>The US does not need a reserve of nuclear weapons to take the offensive. Approximately 200 nuclear warheads will suffice for deterrence and retaliation, and the US has had an arsenal of 32,500 weapons since 1969.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-1484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-7047</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: U.S. Naval War College</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Arms control ; Defense industry ; Environmental aspects ; Equipment and supplies ; History ; International aspects ; International relations ; Media coverage ; Military art and science ; Military policy ; Nuclear arms control ; Nuclear warfare ; Nuclear weapons ; Testing ; United States ; Weapons industry ; Weapons systems</subject><ispartof>Naval War College review, 2001-03, Vol.54 (2), p.13-23</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2001 U.S. Naval War College</rights><rights>Copyright Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Naval War College Spring 2001</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/205927415/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/205927415?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,21368,21375,33590,33591,33964,33965,43712,43927,73967,74214</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turner, Stansfield</creatorcontrib><title>THE DILEMMA OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY</title><title>Naval War College review</title><description>The US does not need a reserve of nuclear weapons to take the offensive. Approximately 200 nuclear warheads will suffice for deterrence and retaliation, and the US has had an arsenal of 32,500 weapons since 1969.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Arms control</subject><subject>Defense industry</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Equipment and supplies</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>International aspects</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Media coverage</subject><subject>Military art and science</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>Nuclear arms control</subject><subject>Nuclear warfare</subject><subject>Nuclear weapons</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Weapons industry</subject><subject>Weapons systems</subject><issn>0028-1484</issn><issn>2475-7047</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqNz1FrgzAQAOAwNljX7T-EPexpgSSeJu5NnF0Fa0drKX2SaGKxWN20_v-ldE_bHkYOcnd83HFXaMJBuERQENdoQimXhIGEW3Q3DAd6rn1ngl6yeYRf4yRaLAK8nOF0EyZRsMLbKHhfpmscp_gssm2UZjsyi1frDIc236x29-imUs1gHr7_KdrMoiyck2T5FodBQvbMA0o09Y3W3NeFLyVQKTiVuiw0eA5zRMVEyaQnBSv8QlEBBdgopQdMcSVd5jtT9HSZ-9F3n6MZTvmxHkrTNKo13TjkHgXOuKD_gI49G7iFjz_goRv71h6Rc-r6XABzLXq-oL1qTF63VXfqVbk3relV07Wmqm07EHYvgHueSf7g9mlzrMvf_guTQXY3</recordid><startdate>20010322</startdate><enddate>20010322</enddate><creator>Turner, Stansfield</creator><general>U.S. Naval War College</general><general>Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Naval War College</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010322</creationdate><title>THE DILEMMA OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY</title><author>Turner, Stansfield</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1640-d09edd29db9884087208dcbd463137f17c186871b9ba074b44b4c8641a2a85193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Arms control</topic><topic>Defense industry</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Equipment and supplies</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>International aspects</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Media coverage</topic><topic>Military art and science</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>Nuclear arms control</topic><topic>Nuclear warfare</topic><topic>Nuclear weapons</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Weapons industry</topic><topic>Weapons systems</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turner, Stansfield</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Naval War College review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turner, Stansfield</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE DILEMMA OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY</atitle><jtitle>Naval War College review</jtitle><date>2001-03-22</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>13-23</pages><issn>0028-1484</issn><eissn>2475-7047</eissn><abstract>The US does not need a reserve of nuclear weapons to take the offensive. Approximately 200 nuclear warheads will suffice for deterrence and retaliation, and the US has had an arsenal of 32,500 weapons since 1969.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>U.S. Naval War College</pub><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-1484 |
ispartof | Naval War College review, 2001-03, Vol.54 (2), p.13-23 |
issn | 0028-1484 2475-7047 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60421270 |
source | JSTOR Open Access Journals; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Analysis Arms control Defense industry Environmental aspects Equipment and supplies History International aspects International relations Media coverage Military art and science Military policy Nuclear arms control Nuclear warfare Nuclear weapons Testing United States Weapons industry Weapons systems |
title | THE DILEMMA OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A36%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20DILEMMA%20OF%20NUCLEAR%20WEAPONS%20IN%20THE%20TWENTY-FIRST%20CENTURY&rft.jtitle=Naval%20War%20College%20review&rft.au=Turner,%20Stansfield&rft.date=2001-03-22&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=13-23&rft.issn=0028-1484&rft.eissn=2475-7047&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA77034452%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1640-d09edd29db9884087208dcbd463137f17c186871b9ba074b44b4c8641a2a85193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205927415&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A77034452&rfr_iscdi=true |