The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: Results from Four Large-Scale Trials

The goal of deliberative democracy is to revitalize civic culture, improve the nature of public discourse, and generate the political will necessary to take effective action on pressing problems. While there exists a fairly substantial amount of literature on the desired features of a deliberative d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public administration review 2000-07, Vol.60 (4), p.360-372
Main Author: Weeks, Edward C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
9130
9190
9550
Balanced budgets
Citizen Participation
Citizens
City councils
Communities
Community Problems
Community Relations
Decision making
Deliberative democracy
Democracy
Experimental/theoretical
Financial budgets
Local Government
News media
Opportunities
Participation
Policy Formation
Policy making
Political aspects
Political participation
Politicians
Public administration
Public Opinion
Public opinion surveys
Public Participation
Public Policy
Public sector
Questionnaires
Response rates
Social aspects
Sociology
Studies
Taxes
United States
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The goal of deliberative democracy is to revitalize civic culture, improve the nature of public discourse, and generate the political will necessary to take effective action on pressing problems. While there exists a fairly substantial amount of literature on the desired features of a deliberative democracy, there is little empirical research on the practical feasibility of convening a large-scale public deliberative process. This article describes a model of deliberative democracy which offers a practical opportunity for all citizens to participate, provides citizens extensive information about the nature of the policy problem, engages citizens in the same problem-solving context as elected officials, and uses rigorous methods. The practical feasibility of this model is assessed through four large-scale implementations, each addressing controversial and politically charged issues in cities ranging in population from 100,000 to 400,000. The conclusion from these trials is that it is possible to convene a large-scale public deliberative process that enables local governments to take effective action on previously intractable issues.
ISSN:0033-3352
1540-6210
DOI:10.1111/0033-3352.00098