Subgroup Identification, Superordinate Identification and Intergroup Bias between the Subgroups

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of subgroup and superordinate identification on intergroup differentiation between the subgroups. Hypotheses based on the social identity approach were formed and tested in two samples gathered from the same Finnish shipyard: Sample 1 cons...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Group processes & intergroup relations 2003-07, Vol.6 (3), p.239-250
Main Authors: Lipponen, Jukka, Helkama, Klaus, Juslin, Milla
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied psychology
Finland
Group dynamics
Group Identity
Human behaviour
Identification
Intergroup Relations
Psychology
Social Identity
Sociology
Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration
Sociology of work and sociology of organizations
Workers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of subgroup and superordinate identification on intergroup differentiation between the subgroups. Hypotheses based on the social identity approach were formed and tested in two samples gathered from the same Finnish shipyard: Sample 1 consisted of the employees of 20 different subcontractors working at the shipyard, and Sample 2 consisted of the shipyard's own workforce. The results from Sample 1 supported the idea that subgroup identification (identification with the subcontractor) is positively related to ingroup bias, and superordinate identification (identification with the shipyard) is negatively related to ingroup bias toward other subgroups under the same superordinate category (shipyard). Among the shipyard's own workers (Sample 2), in turn, identification with the shipyard was significantly related to increased levels of ingroup bias toward the subcontractors working there. The results, thus, indicate that the positive effects of superordinate identification on subgroup relations may be limited to only some of the subgroups.
ISSN:1368-4302
1461-7188
DOI:10.1177/13684302030063002