Loading…

Effects of gain versus loss and certain versus probable outcomes on social value orientations

In an experiment, the effects of types of outcomes on social value orientations (individualism, competition, pro‐social orientation) were investigated. Ninety‐nine students made 28 choices which affected outcomes (points to be converted into money) for themselves and another (unknown) person. About...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of social psychology 2003-05, Vol.33 (3), p.331-337
Main Authors: Poppe, Matthijs, Valkenberg, Huib
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-f8e002ababbe2bba2b2b75610a0b980f11ec6d32022d9ade529b1ecd078c7373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-f8e002ababbe2bba2b2b75610a0b980f11ec6d32022d9ade529b1ecd078c7373
container_end_page 337
container_issue 3
container_start_page 331
container_title European journal of social psychology
container_volume 33
creator Poppe, Matthijs
Valkenberg, Huib
description In an experiment, the effects of types of outcomes on social value orientations (individualism, competition, pro‐social orientation) were investigated. Ninety‐nine students made 28 choices which affected outcomes (points to be converted into money) for themselves and another (unknown) person. About half of them started out with nothing but they could allocate positive outcomes (gains) to themselves and/or the other. The other half were told that they themselves and another person would start out with some outcomes but they could lose outcomes depending on the choices. For about half the participants it was certain that their choices would result in outcomes while for the other half outcomes would be likely rather than certain. The expected utility of the outcomes was the same in the four conditions. In accordance with prospect theory, it was expected and found that participants would be more individualistic in the conditions with losses than in the conditions with gains. In accordance with social comparison theory, it was expected and found that participants would be more competitive in the conditions with probable outcomes than in the conditions with certain outcomes. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ejsp.149
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60472583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38482281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-f8e002ababbe2bba2b2b75610a0b980f11ec6d32022d9ade529b1ecd078c7373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFqFDEUhoMouFbBR8iN4s3Uk8xMJrmUsrbWooLFQkHCSeaMpGZn1mSm2rc3yy7qjfQiBE6-fPycn7HnAo4FgHxNN3l7LBrzgK0EGFOVIx-yFUCjKtl18jF7kvMNABil6hX7uh4G8nPm08C_YRj5LaW8ZB6nnDmOPfeU5n_m2zQ5dJH4tMx-2lD5OPI8-YCR32JcykMKNM44h2nMT9mjAWOmZ4f7iF2-XV-enFUXH0_fnby5qHwjG1MNmkp0LGJH0jmUTrquVQIQnNEwCEFe9bUEKXuDPbXSuDLqodO-q7v6iL3ca0u6Hwvl2W5C9hQjjjQt2SpoOtnq-l6w7YRpQel7wVo3WkotCvhqD_pUNpZosNsUNpjurAC7K8TuCrGlkIK-ODgxe4xDwtGH_JdvtGqF2oWs9tzPEOnuvz67Pv_8ae898CHP9OsPj-m7VWU7rb36cGrPmvfn11fXyn6pfwOiNKp2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38482281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of gain versus loss and certain versus probable outcomes on social value orientations</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Poppe, Matthijs ; Valkenberg, Huib</creator><creatorcontrib>Poppe, Matthijs ; Valkenberg, Huib</creatorcontrib><description>In an experiment, the effects of types of outcomes on social value orientations (individualism, competition, pro‐social orientation) were investigated. Ninety‐nine students made 28 choices which affected outcomes (points to be converted into money) for themselves and another (unknown) person. About half of them started out with nothing but they could allocate positive outcomes (gains) to themselves and/or the other. The other half were told that they themselves and another person would start out with some outcomes but they could lose outcomes depending on the choices. For about half the participants it was certain that their choices would result in outcomes while for the other half outcomes would be likely rather than certain. The expected utility of the outcomes was the same in the four conditions. In accordance with prospect theory, it was expected and found that participants would be more individualistic in the conditions with losses than in the conditions with gains. In accordance with social comparison theory, it was expected and found that participants would be more competitive in the conditions with probable outcomes than in the conditions with certain outcomes. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.149</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Certainty ; Choice ; Competition ; Competitiveness ; Decision Making ; Experiments ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Game Theory ; Human behaviour ; Individualism ; Individualism-Collectivism ; Outcomes ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social comparison ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; Social values ; Value Orientations</subject><ispartof>European journal of social psychology, 2003-05, Vol.33 (3), p.331-337</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-f8e002ababbe2bba2b2b75610a0b980f11ec6d32022d9ade529b1ecd078c7373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-f8e002ababbe2bba2b2b75610a0b980f11ec6d32022d9ade529b1ecd078c7373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000,33224,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14865163$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poppe, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valkenberg, Huib</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of gain versus loss and certain versus probable outcomes on social value orientations</title><title>European journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>In an experiment, the effects of types of outcomes on social value orientations (individualism, competition, pro‐social orientation) were investigated. Ninety‐nine students made 28 choices which affected outcomes (points to be converted into money) for themselves and another (unknown) person. About half of them started out with nothing but they could allocate positive outcomes (gains) to themselves and/or the other. The other half were told that they themselves and another person would start out with some outcomes but they could lose outcomes depending on the choices. For about half the participants it was certain that their choices would result in outcomes while for the other half outcomes would be likely rather than certain. The expected utility of the outcomes was the same in the four conditions. In accordance with prospect theory, it was expected and found that participants would be more individualistic in the conditions with losses than in the conditions with gains. In accordance with social comparison theory, it was expected and found that participants would be more competitive in the conditions with probable outcomes than in the conditions with certain outcomes. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Certainty</subject><subject>Choice</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Human behaviour</subject><subject>Individualism</subject><subject>Individualism-Collectivism</subject><subject>Outcomes</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social comparison</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social values</subject><subject>Value Orientations</subject><issn>0046-2772</issn><issn>1099-0992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdFqFDEUhoMouFbBR8iN4s3Uk8xMJrmUsrbWooLFQkHCSeaMpGZn1mSm2rc3yy7qjfQiBE6-fPycn7HnAo4FgHxNN3l7LBrzgK0EGFOVIx-yFUCjKtl18jF7kvMNABil6hX7uh4G8nPm08C_YRj5LaW8ZB6nnDmOPfeU5n_m2zQ5dJH4tMx-2lD5OPI8-YCR32JcykMKNM44h2nMT9mjAWOmZ4f7iF2-XV-enFUXH0_fnby5qHwjG1MNmkp0LGJH0jmUTrquVQIQnNEwCEFe9bUEKXuDPbXSuDLqodO-q7v6iL3ca0u6Hwvl2W5C9hQjjjQt2SpoOtnq-l6w7YRpQel7wVo3WkotCvhqD_pUNpZosNsUNpjurAC7K8TuCrGlkIK-ODgxe4xDwtGH_JdvtGqF2oWs9tzPEOnuvz67Pv_8ae898CHP9OsPj-m7VWU7rb36cGrPmvfn11fXyn6pfwOiNKp2</recordid><startdate>200305</startdate><enddate>200305</enddate><creator>Poppe, Matthijs</creator><creator>Valkenberg, Huib</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200305</creationdate><title>Effects of gain versus loss and certain versus probable outcomes on social value orientations</title><author>Poppe, Matthijs ; Valkenberg, Huib</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-f8e002ababbe2bba2b2b75610a0b980f11ec6d32022d9ade529b1ecd078c7373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Certainty</topic><topic>Choice</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Human behaviour</topic><topic>Individualism</topic><topic>Individualism-Collectivism</topic><topic>Outcomes</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social comparison</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social values</topic><topic>Value Orientations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poppe, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valkenberg, Huib</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poppe, Matthijs</au><au>Valkenberg, Huib</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of gain versus loss and certain versus probable outcomes on social value orientations</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>2003-05</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>337</epage><pages>331-337</pages><issn>0046-2772</issn><eissn>1099-0992</eissn><coden>EJSPA6</coden><abstract>In an experiment, the effects of types of outcomes on social value orientations (individualism, competition, pro‐social orientation) were investigated. Ninety‐nine students made 28 choices which affected outcomes (points to be converted into money) for themselves and another (unknown) person. About half of them started out with nothing but they could allocate positive outcomes (gains) to themselves and/or the other. The other half were told that they themselves and another person would start out with some outcomes but they could lose outcomes depending on the choices. For about half the participants it was certain that their choices would result in outcomes while for the other half outcomes would be likely rather than certain. The expected utility of the outcomes was the same in the four conditions. In accordance with prospect theory, it was expected and found that participants would be more individualistic in the conditions with losses than in the conditions with gains. In accordance with social comparison theory, it was expected and found that participants would be more competitive in the conditions with probable outcomes than in the conditions with certain outcomes. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ejsp.149</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-2772
ispartof European journal of social psychology, 2003-05, Vol.33 (3), p.331-337
issn 0046-2772
1099-0992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60472583
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Altruism
Biological and medical sciences
Certainty
Choice
Competition
Competitiveness
Decision Making
Experiments
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Game Theory
Human behaviour
Individualism
Individualism-Collectivism
Outcomes
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Social comparison
Social interactions. Communication. Group processes
Social psychology
Social values
Value Orientations
title Effects of gain versus loss and certain versus probable outcomes on social value orientations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A22%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20gain%20versus%20loss%20and%20certain%20versus%20probable%20outcomes%20on%20social%20value%20orientations&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Poppe,%20Matthijs&rft.date=2003-05&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=337&rft.pages=331-337&rft.issn=0046-2772&rft.eissn=1099-0992&rft.coden=EJSPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ejsp.149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38482281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4249-f8e002ababbe2bba2b2b75610a0b980f11ec6d32022d9ade529b1ecd078c7373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38482281&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true