Loading…

De facto, displaced, tacit: The sovereign articulations of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile

Based on ethnographic research on exiled Tibetan political institutions and practices in India, this paper investigates sovereignty in exile. The Tibetan Government-in-Exile (TGiE) remains internationally unrecognised and lacks de jure sovereignty over territory in both Tibet and in exile. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Political geography 2009-08, Vol.28 (6), p.343-352
Main Author: McConnell, Fiona
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7ba00c159d6ba1f5c4b5c5dca36e5afddfb06d63f04041973c4d7e8a34e1ab3b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7ba00c159d6ba1f5c4b5c5dca36e5afddfb06d63f04041973c4d7e8a34e1ab3b3
container_end_page 352
container_issue 6
container_start_page 343
container_title Political geography
container_volume 28
creator McConnell, Fiona
description Based on ethnographic research on exiled Tibetan political institutions and practices in India, this paper investigates sovereignty in exile. The Tibetan Government-in-Exile (TGiE) remains internationally unrecognised and lacks de jure sovereignty over territory in both Tibet and in exile. However, this exiled administration claims legitimacy as the official representative of the Tibetan population, performs a number of state-like functions in relation to its diasporic ‘citizenry’ and attempts to make its voice heard within the international community. Rejecting arguments that such entities should be viewed merely as discrepant forms of political practice, this paper asserts that the state, sovereignty, and territory can be conceptually disentangled, opening up the theoretical possibility of entities other than territorial states claiming sovereignty. In teasing apart and problematising constituent elements of sovereignty, this paper focuses on three aspects of the TGiE's articulations of sovereignty: its claims to and production of legitimacy, authority and de facto sovereignty; its displaced sovereignty and strategies of territorial governance over non-contiguous spaces in exile; and the mediation of its ambiguous relationship with the host state India through practices of tacit sovereignty.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.04.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60549708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0962629809000432</els_id><sourcerecordid>60549708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7ba00c159d6ba1f5c4b5c5dca36e5afddfb06d63f04041973c4d7e8a34e1ab3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFuFDEQhi0EEkfgDSjcQJVdxmuvd5cCCYUQkCLRHA2NNWuPg09768P2ReTt8ekiSmhmivn-f6SPsdcCWgFCv9u1h7jcUWw7gKkF1QKIJ2wjxkE2PUz6KdvU2TW6m8bn7EXOO6ggDLBhPz4R92hLvOQu5MOCltwlL2hDec-3P4nneE-Jwt3KMZVgjwuWENfMo-elnrdhpoIrvzlh657W0oS1uf4dFnrJnnlcMr163Bfs--fr7dWX5vbbzderj7eNldNYmmFGACv6yekZhe-tmnvbO4tSU4_eOT-Ddlp6UKDENEir3EAjSkUCZznLC_b23HtI8deRcjH7kC0tC64Uj9lo6NU0wPhfUA5d1yt9AtUZtCnmnMibQwp7TA9GgDkZNztzNm5Oxg0oU43X2JvHfswWF59wtSH_zdbybpTjVLkPZ46qlftAyWQbaK3mQyJbjIvh34_-AO5fmXM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37225468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>De facto, displaced, tacit: The sovereign articulations of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>McConnell, Fiona</creator><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Fiona</creatorcontrib><description>Based on ethnographic research on exiled Tibetan political institutions and practices in India, this paper investigates sovereignty in exile. The Tibetan Government-in-Exile (TGiE) remains internationally unrecognised and lacks de jure sovereignty over territory in both Tibet and in exile. However, this exiled administration claims legitimacy as the official representative of the Tibetan population, performs a number of state-like functions in relation to its diasporic ‘citizenry’ and attempts to make its voice heard within the international community. Rejecting arguments that such entities should be viewed merely as discrepant forms of political practice, this paper asserts that the state, sovereignty, and territory can be conceptually disentangled, opening up the theoretical possibility of entities other than territorial states claiming sovereignty. In teasing apart and problematising constituent elements of sovereignty, this paper focuses on three aspects of the TGiE's articulations of sovereignty: its claims to and production of legitimacy, authority and de facto sovereignty; its displaced sovereignty and strategies of territorial governance over non-contiguous spaces in exile; and the mediation of its ambiguous relationship with the host state India through practices of tacit sovereignty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-6298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.04.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Asia ; Bgi / Prodig ; China ; Citizenship ; Exile ; Geopolitics ; Government ; India ; International political economy ; International relations ; Legitimacy ; Peoples Republic of China ; Political Defection ; Political Power ; Recognition ; Regional studies ; Sovereignty ; Territory ; Tibet ; Tibetan Government-in-Exile</subject><ispartof>Political geography, 2009-08, Vol.28 (6), p.343-352</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Tous droits réservés © Prodig - Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (BGI), 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7ba00c159d6ba1f5c4b5c5dca36e5afddfb06d63f04041973c4d7e8a34e1ab3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7ba00c159d6ba1f5c4b5c5dca36e5afddfb06d63f04041973c4d7e8a34e1ab3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22528389$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Fiona</creatorcontrib><title>De facto, displaced, tacit: The sovereign articulations of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile</title><title>Political geography</title><description>Based on ethnographic research on exiled Tibetan political institutions and practices in India, this paper investigates sovereignty in exile. The Tibetan Government-in-Exile (TGiE) remains internationally unrecognised and lacks de jure sovereignty over territory in both Tibet and in exile. However, this exiled administration claims legitimacy as the official representative of the Tibetan population, performs a number of state-like functions in relation to its diasporic ‘citizenry’ and attempts to make its voice heard within the international community. Rejecting arguments that such entities should be viewed merely as discrepant forms of political practice, this paper asserts that the state, sovereignty, and territory can be conceptually disentangled, opening up the theoretical possibility of entities other than territorial states claiming sovereignty. In teasing apart and problematising constituent elements of sovereignty, this paper focuses on three aspects of the TGiE's articulations of sovereignty: its claims to and production of legitimacy, authority and de facto sovereignty; its displaced sovereignty and strategies of territorial governance over non-contiguous spaces in exile; and the mediation of its ambiguous relationship with the host state India through practices of tacit sovereignty.</description><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Bgi / Prodig</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Exile</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>International political economy</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Political Defection</subject><subject>Political Power</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Regional studies</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Territory</subject><subject>Tibet</subject><subject>Tibetan Government-in-Exile</subject><issn>0962-6298</issn><issn>1873-5096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLFuFDEQhi0EEkfgDSjcQJVdxmuvd5cCCYUQkCLRHA2NNWuPg09768P2ReTt8ekiSmhmivn-f6SPsdcCWgFCv9u1h7jcUWw7gKkF1QKIJ2wjxkE2PUz6KdvU2TW6m8bn7EXOO6ggDLBhPz4R92hLvOQu5MOCltwlL2hDec-3P4nneE-Jwt3KMZVgjwuWENfMo-elnrdhpoIrvzlh657W0oS1uf4dFnrJnnlcMr163Bfs--fr7dWX5vbbzderj7eNldNYmmFGACv6yekZhe-tmnvbO4tSU4_eOT-Ddlp6UKDENEir3EAjSkUCZznLC_b23HtI8deRcjH7kC0tC64Uj9lo6NU0wPhfUA5d1yt9AtUZtCnmnMibQwp7TA9GgDkZNztzNm5Oxg0oU43X2JvHfswWF59wtSH_zdbybpTjVLkPZ46qlftAyWQbaK3mQyJbjIvh34_-AO5fmXM</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>McConnell, Fiona</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Butterworth-Heinemann</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>De facto, displaced, tacit: The sovereign articulations of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile</title><author>McConnell, Fiona</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7ba00c159d6ba1f5c4b5c5dca36e5afddfb06d63f04041973c4d7e8a34e1ab3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Bgi / Prodig</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Exile</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>International political economy</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Political Defection</topic><topic>Political Power</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Regional studies</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Territory</topic><topic>Tibet</topic><topic>Tibetan Government-in-Exile</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McConnell, Fiona</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Political geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McConnell, Fiona</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>De facto, displaced, tacit: The sovereign articulations of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile</atitle><jtitle>Political geography</jtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>343-352</pages><issn>0962-6298</issn><eissn>1873-5096</eissn><abstract>Based on ethnographic research on exiled Tibetan political institutions and practices in India, this paper investigates sovereignty in exile. The Tibetan Government-in-Exile (TGiE) remains internationally unrecognised and lacks de jure sovereignty over territory in both Tibet and in exile. However, this exiled administration claims legitimacy as the official representative of the Tibetan population, performs a number of state-like functions in relation to its diasporic ‘citizenry’ and attempts to make its voice heard within the international community. Rejecting arguments that such entities should be viewed merely as discrepant forms of political practice, this paper asserts that the state, sovereignty, and territory can be conceptually disentangled, opening up the theoretical possibility of entities other than territorial states claiming sovereignty. In teasing apart and problematising constituent elements of sovereignty, this paper focuses on three aspects of the TGiE's articulations of sovereignty: its claims to and production of legitimacy, authority and de facto sovereignty; its displaced sovereignty and strategies of territorial governance over non-contiguous spaces in exile; and the mediation of its ambiguous relationship with the host state India through practices of tacit sovereignty.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.04.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-6298
ispartof Political geography, 2009-08, Vol.28 (6), p.343-352
issn 0962-6298
1873-5096
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60549708
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Asia
Bgi / Prodig
China
Citizenship
Exile
Geopolitics
Government
India
International political economy
International relations
Legitimacy
Peoples Republic of China
Political Defection
Political Power
Recognition
Regional studies
Sovereignty
Territory
Tibet
Tibetan Government-in-Exile
title De facto, displaced, tacit: The sovereign articulations of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A04%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=De%20facto,%20displaced,%20tacit:%20The%20sovereign%20articulations%20of%20the%20Tibetan%20Government-in-Exile&rft.jtitle=Political%20geography&rft.au=McConnell,%20Fiona&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=343-352&rft.issn=0962-6298&rft.eissn=1873-5096&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60549708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-7ba00c159d6ba1f5c4b5c5dca36e5afddfb06d63f04041973c4d7e8a34e1ab3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37225468&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true