Dimensions of Conflict Resolution in Ethnopolitical Disputes

In this introduction to the special issue, the various dimensions of approaches to conflict resolution in identity disputes are explored. The implementation of existing peace accords in countries troubled by domestic fighting turns out to be a knottier policy problem than expected and subject to lin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of peace research 2001-05, Vol.38 (3), p.275-287
Main Author: Pearson, Frederic S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Balance of power
Bargaining
Communication
Conflict Resolution
Ethnic conflict
Ethnic Relations
Ethnology
Ethnopolitics
Identity
International agreements
International Conflict
Mediation
Negotiation
Peace negotiations
Peace studies
Peace treaties
Peacetime
Policy making
Political parties
Politics
Public policy
Regional identity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this introduction to the special issue, the various dimensions of approaches to conflict resolution in identity disputes are explored. The implementation of existing peace accords in countries troubled by domestic fighting turns out to be a knottier policy problem than expected and subject to lingering distrust and miscommunication. The role of two sets of factors in bringing about agreement and/or implementation is explored: grass-roots versus elite initiatives and the identity versus instrumental nature of the negotiations. Factors such as the degree of preliminary dialogue and pre-bargaining, the involvement of officials versus civic representatives, concern about fear and distrust may be weighed against the more usual calculations of power balances, exhaustion, and stalemate in accounting for peaceful settlements. The interplay between these categories has a great deal to do with the prospects and outcomes of conflict management approaches and is the subject of the articles to follow. The studies were designed to test, utilizing a comparative case-study framework, which dimension, if any, turns out to be most influential in a series of local violent ethnopolitical disputes. Findings, while varied, point to the importance of grass-roots participation in the negotiation process.
ISSN:0022-3433
1460-3578
DOI:10.1177/0022343301038003001