Try Again: A Reply to Russett, Oneal & Cox

A reply to Russett, Oneal, & Cox ([RO&C] 2000), who claim that militarized interstate disputes serve to test a hypothesis furthered by Huntington (1996) regarding civilization clashes, posits that they are mistaken. It is argued that the original hypothesis concerned post-Cold War politics,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of peace research 2000-09, Vol.37 (5), p.609-610
Main Author: Huntington, Samuel P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Civilization
Clash of civilizations
Cold wars
International Conflict
International politics
International Relations
Interstate conflict
Literature
Political Science Theories
Post Cold War Period
Theoretical Problems
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37fc89c5527c140abd6665e32541b2eea44a72b87c07f7cbf6f0431088bea1423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37fc89c5527c140abd6665e32541b2eea44a72b87c07f7cbf6f0431088bea1423
container_end_page 610
container_issue 5
container_start_page 609
container_title Journal of peace research
container_volume 37
creator Huntington, Samuel P.
description A reply to Russett, Oneal, & Cox ([RO&C] 2000), who claim that militarized interstate disputes serve to test a hypothesis furthered by Huntington (1996) regarding civilization clashes, posits that they are mistaken. It is argued that the original hypothesis concerned post-Cold War politics, while RO&C analyze mostly Cold War politics. In addition, the data set used by RO&C is deemed limited & temporally irrelevant. The hypothesis is concerned with the escalation dynamics of intercivilizational conflicts, not the frequency of such conflicts, as focused on by RO&C. It is concluded that the RO&C article does not address Huntington's central thesis. 3 References. T. Noland
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0022343300037005004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60551513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>425281</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0022343300037005004</sage_id><sourcerecordid>425281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37fc89c5527c140abd6665e32541b2eea44a72b87c07f7cbf6f0431088bea1423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKu_oJuA4EIcvcnNq-5K8QWFQqnrkImZ0jKdqckM2H_vlBEREVdn833nXg4hIwa3jGl9B8A5CkQAQA0gAcQRGTChIEOpzTEZHIjsgJySs5Q2HajGAANyvYx7Olm5dXVPJ3QRduWeNjVdtCmFprmh8yq4kl7Raf1xTk4KV6Zw8ZVD8vr4sJw-Z7P508t0Msu8AGgy1IU3Yy8l154JcPmbUkoG5FKwnIfghHCa50Z70IX2eaEKEMjAmDw4JjgOyVXfu4v1extSY7fr5ENZuirUbbIKpGSSYQde_gI3dRur7jfLlMGxRt7FkGBP-VinFENhd3G9dXFvGdjDevaP9ToLeiu5VfjR-68y6pVNaur4fUVwyQ3DT5RFc7s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683973268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Try Again: A Reply to Russett, Oneal &amp; Cox</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Huntington, Samuel P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huntington, Samuel P.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[A reply to Russett, Oneal, & Cox ([RO&C] 2000), who claim that militarized interstate disputes serve to test a hypothesis furthered by Huntington (1996) regarding civilization clashes, posits that they are mistaken. It is argued that the original hypothesis concerned post-Cold War politics, while RO&C analyze mostly Cold War politics. In addition, the data set used by RO&C is deemed limited & temporally irrelevant. The hypothesis is concerned with the escalation dynamics of intercivilizational conflicts, not the frequency of such conflicts, as focused on by RO&C. It is concluded that the RO&C article does not address Huntington's central thesis. 3 References. T. Noland]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022343300037005004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPERB6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>6 Bonhill Street, London EC2A 4PU, UK: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Civilization ; Clash of civilizations ; Cold wars ; International Conflict ; International politics ; International Relations ; Interstate conflict ; Literature ; Political Science Theories ; Post Cold War Period ; Theoretical Problems</subject><ispartof>Journal of peace research, 2000-09, Vol.37 (5), p.609-610</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 International Peace Research Institute, Oslo</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37fc89c5527c140abd6665e32541b2eea44a72b87c07f7cbf6f0431088bea1423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37fc89c5527c140abd6665e32541b2eea44a72b87c07f7cbf6f0431088bea1423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/425281$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/425281$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huntington, Samuel P.</creatorcontrib><title>Try Again: A Reply to Russett, Oneal &amp; Cox</title><title>Journal of peace research</title><description><![CDATA[A reply to Russett, Oneal, & Cox ([RO&C] 2000), who claim that militarized interstate disputes serve to test a hypothesis furthered by Huntington (1996) regarding civilization clashes, posits that they are mistaken. It is argued that the original hypothesis concerned post-Cold War politics, while RO&C analyze mostly Cold War politics. In addition, the data set used by RO&C is deemed limited & temporally irrelevant. The hypothesis is concerned with the escalation dynamics of intercivilizational conflicts, not the frequency of such conflicts, as focused on by RO&C. It is concluded that the RO&C article does not address Huntington's central thesis. 3 References. T. Noland]]></description><subject>Civilization</subject><subject>Clash of civilizations</subject><subject>Cold wars</subject><subject>International Conflict</subject><subject>International politics</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>Interstate conflict</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Political Science Theories</subject><subject>Post Cold War Period</subject><subject>Theoretical Problems</subject><issn>0022-3433</issn><issn>1460-3578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKu_oJuA4EIcvcnNq-5K8QWFQqnrkImZ0jKdqckM2H_vlBEREVdn833nXg4hIwa3jGl9B8A5CkQAQA0gAcQRGTChIEOpzTEZHIjsgJySs5Q2HajGAANyvYx7Olm5dXVPJ3QRduWeNjVdtCmFprmh8yq4kl7Raf1xTk4KV6Zw8ZVD8vr4sJw-Z7P508t0Msu8AGgy1IU3Yy8l154JcPmbUkoG5FKwnIfghHCa50Z70IX2eaEKEMjAmDw4JjgOyVXfu4v1extSY7fr5ENZuirUbbIKpGSSYQde_gI3dRur7jfLlMGxRt7FkGBP-VinFENhd3G9dXFvGdjDevaP9ToLeiu5VfjR-68y6pVNaur4fUVwyQ3DT5RFc7s</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>Huntington, Samuel P.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Universitetsforlaget</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HBMBR</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>Try Again: A Reply to Russett, Oneal &amp; Cox</title><author>Huntington, Samuel P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37fc89c5527c140abd6665e32541b2eea44a72b87c07f7cbf6f0431088bea1423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Civilization</topic><topic>Clash of civilizations</topic><topic>Cold wars</topic><topic>International Conflict</topic><topic>International politics</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>Interstate conflict</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Political Science Theories</topic><topic>Post Cold War Period</topic><topic>Theoretical Problems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huntington, Samuel P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 14</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of peace research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huntington, Samuel P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Try Again: A Reply to Russett, Oneal &amp; Cox</atitle><jtitle>Journal of peace research</jtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>610</epage><pages>609-610</pages><issn>0022-3433</issn><eissn>1460-3578</eissn><coden>JPERB6</coden><abstract><![CDATA[A reply to Russett, Oneal, & Cox ([RO&C] 2000), who claim that militarized interstate disputes serve to test a hypothesis furthered by Huntington (1996) regarding civilization clashes, posits that they are mistaken. It is argued that the original hypothesis concerned post-Cold War politics, while RO&C analyze mostly Cold War politics. In addition, the data set used by RO&C is deemed limited & temporally irrelevant. The hypothesis is concerned with the escalation dynamics of intercivilizational conflicts, not the frequency of such conflicts, as focused on by RO&C. It is concluded that the RO&C article does not address Huntington's central thesis. 3 References. T. Noland]]></abstract><cop>6 Bonhill Street, London EC2A 4PU, UK</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022343300037005004</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3433
ispartof Journal of peace research, 2000-09, Vol.37 (5), p.609-610
issn 0022-3433
1460-3578
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60551513
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals Online
subjects Civilization
Clash of civilizations
Cold wars
International Conflict
International politics
International Relations
Interstate conflict
Literature
Political Science Theories
Post Cold War Period
Theoretical Problems
title Try Again: A Reply to Russett, Oneal & Cox
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A14%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Try%20Again:%20A%20Reply%20to%20Russett,%20Oneal%20&%20Cox&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20peace%20research&rft.au=Huntington,%20Samuel%20P.&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=610&rft.pages=609-610&rft.issn=0022-3433&rft.eissn=1460-3578&rft.coden=JPERB6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022343300037005004&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E425281%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37fc89c5527c140abd6665e32541b2eea44a72b87c07f7cbf6f0431088bea1423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683973268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=425281&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022343300037005004&rfr_iscdi=true