Loading…
A Note on the Rothman, Lipset, and Nevitte Paper
As part of a symposium commenting on by Stanley Rothman, Seymour Martin Lipset, & Neil Nevitte's "Does Enrollment Diversity Improve University Education (2003)," important methodological problems with the authors' study are identified. Of primary concern is the reliance on re...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal for quality in health care 2003-12, Vol.15 (4), p.381-388 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 388 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 381 |
container_title | International journal for quality in health care |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Barton, Allen H |
description | As part of a symposium commenting on by Stanley Rothman, Seymour Martin Lipset, & Neil Nevitte's "Does Enrollment Diversity Improve University Education (2003)," important methodological problems with the authors' study are identified. Of primary concern is the reliance on respondents' (students, faculty, & administrators) subjective ratings as a measure of educational quality. Ways that such perceptions can be biased by racial stereotypes & prejudices are discussed, along with the need for more accurate analysis & presentation of the data. Areas for further research & policy implications are also explored. 7 References. K. Hyatt Stewart |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ijpor/15.4.381 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60586405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37876152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-362da8b3202c391fb9ac43f6cd403486cd8eb1f8f5623d397166dccabd9a51b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkT1PwzAURS0EEqWwMkcMTCT1iz9ij1UFFKkqUIFAXSwncdSUNg62i-Dfk1LEwALTXc690nsHoVPACWBJBvWytW4ALKEJEbCHekAziLnEch_1sGQ0ToVMD9GR90uMMcMCeggPo6kNJrJNFBYmmtmwWOvmIprUrTfhItJNGU3NWx065k63xh2jg0qvvDn5zj56vLp8GI3jye31zWg4iQvCcIgJT0stcpLitCASqlzqgpKKFyXFhIouhcmhEhXjKSmJzIDzsih0XkrNIAfSR-e73dbZ143xQa1rX5jVSjfGbrzimAlOMfsHSAWTgv8JkkxkHFjagWe_wKXduKa7VoGUQmZSbteSHVQ4670zlWpdvdbuQwFWWx_qy4cCpqjqfHSFeFeofTDvP7R2L4pnJGNq_DxX99135rMnpibkE6feiy4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199897996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Note on the Rothman, Lipset, and Nevitte Paper</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Barton, Allen H</creator><creatorcontrib>Barton, Allen H</creatorcontrib><description>As part of a symposium commenting on by Stanley Rothman, Seymour Martin Lipset, & Neil Nevitte's "Does Enrollment Diversity Improve University Education (2003)," important methodological problems with the authors' study are identified. Of primary concern is the reliance on respondents' (students, faculty, & administrators) subjective ratings as a measure of educational quality. Ways that such perceptions can be biased by racial stereotypes & prejudices are discussed, along with the need for more accurate analysis & presentation of the data. Areas for further research & policy implications are also explored. 7 References. K. Hyatt Stewart</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-2892</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1353-4505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/15.4.381</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPOE2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Affirmative Action ; Colleges & universities ; Cultural diversity ; Education policy ; Educational Policy ; Educational Research ; Enrollments ; Higher Education ; Methodological Problems ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Public opinion ; Quality ; Quality of education ; Quality standards ; Questionnaires ; Race ; Racial Relations ; U.S.A ; Universities</subject><ispartof>International journal for quality in health care, 2003-12, Vol.15 (4), p.381-388</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Dec 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,33201,33751,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barton, Allen H</creatorcontrib><title>A Note on the Rothman, Lipset, and Nevitte Paper</title><title>International journal for quality in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Public Opin Res</addtitle><description>As part of a symposium commenting on by Stanley Rothman, Seymour Martin Lipset, & Neil Nevitte's "Does Enrollment Diversity Improve University Education (2003)," important methodological problems with the authors' study are identified. Of primary concern is the reliance on respondents' (students, faculty, & administrators) subjective ratings as a measure of educational quality. Ways that such perceptions can be biased by racial stereotypes & prejudices are discussed, along with the need for more accurate analysis & presentation of the data. Areas for further research & policy implications are also explored. 7 References. K. Hyatt Stewart</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Affirmative Action</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Cultural diversity</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality of education</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial Relations</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0954-2892</issn><issn>1353-4505</issn><issn>1471-6909</issn><issn>1464-3677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkT1PwzAURS0EEqWwMkcMTCT1iz9ij1UFFKkqUIFAXSwncdSUNg62i-Dfk1LEwALTXc690nsHoVPACWBJBvWytW4ALKEJEbCHekAziLnEch_1sGQ0ToVMD9GR90uMMcMCeggPo6kNJrJNFBYmmtmwWOvmIprUrTfhItJNGU3NWx065k63xh2jg0qvvDn5zj56vLp8GI3jye31zWg4iQvCcIgJT0stcpLitCASqlzqgpKKFyXFhIouhcmhEhXjKSmJzIDzsih0XkrNIAfSR-e73dbZ143xQa1rX5jVSjfGbrzimAlOMfsHSAWTgv8JkkxkHFjagWe_wKXduKa7VoGUQmZSbteSHVQ4670zlWpdvdbuQwFWWx_qy4cCpqjqfHSFeFeofTDvP7R2L4pnJGNq_DxX99135rMnpibkE6feiy4</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>Barton, Allen H</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>A Note on the Rothman, Lipset, and Nevitte Paper</title><author>Barton, Allen H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-362da8b3202c391fb9ac43f6cd403486cd8eb1f8f5623d397166dccabd9a51b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Affirmative Action</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Cultural diversity</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality of education</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial Relations</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barton, Allen H</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal for quality in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barton, Allen H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Note on the Rothman, Lipset, and Nevitte Paper</atitle><jtitle>International journal for quality in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Public Opin Res</addtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>381-388</pages><issn>0954-2892</issn><issn>1353-4505</issn><eissn>1471-6909</eissn><eissn>1464-3677</eissn><coden>IJPOE2</coden><abstract>As part of a symposium commenting on by Stanley Rothman, Seymour Martin Lipset, & Neil Nevitte's "Does Enrollment Diversity Improve University Education (2003)," important methodological problems with the authors' study are identified. Of primary concern is the reliance on respondents' (students, faculty, & administrators) subjective ratings as a measure of educational quality. Ways that such perceptions can be biased by racial stereotypes & prejudices are discussed, along with the need for more accurate analysis & presentation of the data. Areas for further research & policy implications are also explored. 7 References. K. Hyatt Stewart</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ijpor/15.4.381</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-2892 |
ispartof | International journal for quality in health care, 2003-12, Vol.15 (4), p.381-388 |
issn | 0954-2892 1353-4505 1471-6909 1464-3677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60586405 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Oxford Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Academic achievement Affirmative Action Colleges & universities Cultural diversity Education policy Educational Policy Educational Research Enrollments Higher Education Methodological Problems Multiculturalism & pluralism Public opinion Quality Quality of education Quality standards Questionnaires Race Racial Relations U.S.A Universities |
title | A Note on the Rothman, Lipset, and Nevitte Paper |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A29%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Note%20on%20the%20Rothman,%20Lipset,%20and%20Nevitte%20Paper&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20quality%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Barton,%20Allen%20H&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=381-388&rft.issn=0954-2892&rft.eissn=1471-6909&rft.coden=IJPOE2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/15.4.381&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37876152%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-362da8b3202c391fb9ac43f6cd403486cd8eb1f8f5623d397166dccabd9a51b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199897996&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |