Loading…

Field Experiments with Formal Organizations

3 recent field exp's are described briefly & compared re: (1) criteria for choice of S org's, (2) contrived vs natural approach to change, (3) nature & theoretical character of the change, control & criterion variables, (4) the instit'al, org'al, socpsychol'al or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human organization 1964-07, Vol.23 (2), p.164-170
Main Authors: Seashore, Stanley E., eSashore, Stanley E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-efa008574799c1bd476085b1c9426a063e34ac3b01fbbc7f3fbfb2bc3a802eac3
cites
container_end_page 170
container_issue 2
container_start_page 164
container_title Human organization
container_volume 23
creator Seashore, Stanley E.
eSashore, Stanley E.
description 3 recent field exp's are described briefly & compared re: (1) criteria for choice of S org's, (2) contrived vs natural approach to change, (3) nature & theoretical character of the change, control & criterion variables, (4) the instit'al, org'al, socpsychol'al or individual level of the theory, (5) the duration of the experiment in time, & (6) the analysis strategy for testing causal hyp's. The dilemmas discussed are thought to be not unique to field exp's with complex org's, but more troublesome in such exp's than in laboratory or small group exp's: (A) preference for control vs representativeness in choice of S org's, (B) choice of short-term vs long-duration exp'al periods with risks of insufficient change vs intrustion of disturbing events, (C) preference for smaller, explicit theories vs global, syndromatic theories with issues of precision vs comprehensiveness, (D) prepreference for limited & controlled change induction vs massive & powerful change induction, (E) preference for `near' vs 'distant' criteria re the number of hyp'ed links in the causal chain of variables being investigated, (F) preference for self-selected vs independently-selected S org's, & (G) weighing of technical design consideration vs ethical & practical considerations in conducting the field work. It is suggested that at the present primitive stage of development in exp'tion with org's, priority should be given to simplicity of design & to the opportunistic search for res sites that ease these dilemmas. Modified AA.
doi_str_mv 10.17730/humo.23.2.d377411314j8w41r
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60591031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44124979</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44124979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-efa008574799c1bd476085b1c9426a063e34ac3b01fbbc7f3fbfb2bc3a802eac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QSgMvJHWk482DV7J2FQY7EavQ5KlrqVtZtIy9dcbnXixq3BynvdwzoPQDEOGOadwtx07lxGakWxDOWcYU8yacs-wP0ETLGiZ0pzkp2gCgMuUk1yco4sQGgBg8WeCbpe1bTfJ4mNnfd3ZfgjJvh62ydL5TrXJ2r-pvv5SQ-36cInOKtUGe_X3TtHrcvEyf0pX68fn-cMqNYQXQ2orBVDmnHEhDNYbxotYamwEI4WCglrKlKEacKW14RWtdKWJNlSVQGzsTNHNYe7Ou_fRhkF2dTC2bVVv3RhkAbnAQHEEZ0dg40bfx91kFAFEMOA0UvcHyngXgreV3MVTlf-UGOSvRvmjURIqiTzWGNPXh3QTBuf_o4xhwgQX9BtalHHG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1310294073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field Experiments with Formal Organizations</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Seashore, Stanley E. ; eSashore, Stanley E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seashore, Stanley E. ; eSashore, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[3 recent field exp's are described briefly & compared re: (1) criteria for choice of S org's, (2) contrived vs natural approach to change, (3) nature & theoretical character of the change, control & criterion variables, (4) the instit'al, org'al, socpsychol'al or individual level of the theory, (5) the duration of the experiment in time, & (6) the analysis strategy for testing causal hyp's. The dilemmas discussed are thought to be not unique to field exp's with complex org's, but more troublesome in such exp's than in laboratory or small group exp's: (A) preference for control vs representativeness in choice of S org's, (B) choice of short-term vs long-duration exp'al periods with risks of insufficient change vs intrustion of disturbing events, (C) preference for smaller, explicit theories vs global, syndromatic theories with issues of precision vs comprehensiveness, (D) prepreference for limited & controlled change induction vs massive & powerful change induction, (E) preference for `near' vs 'distant' criteria re the number of hyp'ed links in the causal chain of variables being investigated, (F) preference for self-selected vs independently-selected S org's, & (G) weighing of technical design consideration vs ethical & practical considerations in conducting the field work. It is suggested that at the present primitive stage of development in exp'tion with org's, priority should be given to simplicity of design & to the opportunistic search for res sites that ease these dilemmas. Modified AA.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7259</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3525</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17730/humo.23.2.d377411314j8w41r</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUORAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: The Society for Applied Anthropology</publisher><subject>Control units ; Experiment design ; Experiment/Experiments/Experimental/ Experimenter/ Experimentation/ Experimentalism ; Experimentation ; Field ; Field experiments ; Field Methods and Techniques ; Formal organization ; Job performance ; Organization/Organizations/ Organizational/ Organize/ Organizers/ Organized/ Organizing ; Organizational theory ; Population size ; Research design ; Seashores</subject><ispartof>Human organization, 1964-07, Vol.23 (2), p.164-170</ispartof><rights>1964 The Society for Applied Anthropology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-efa008574799c1bd476085b1c9426a063e34ac3b01fbbc7f3fbfb2bc3a802eac3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44124979$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44124979$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899,33749,58210,58443</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seashore, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>eSashore, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><title>Field Experiments with Formal Organizations</title><title>Human organization</title><description><![CDATA[3 recent field exp's are described briefly & compared re: (1) criteria for choice of S org's, (2) contrived vs natural approach to change, (3) nature & theoretical character of the change, control & criterion variables, (4) the instit'al, org'al, socpsychol'al or individual level of the theory, (5) the duration of the experiment in time, & (6) the analysis strategy for testing causal hyp's. The dilemmas discussed are thought to be not unique to field exp's with complex org's, but more troublesome in such exp's than in laboratory or small group exp's: (A) preference for control vs representativeness in choice of S org's, (B) choice of short-term vs long-duration exp'al periods with risks of insufficient change vs intrustion of disturbing events, (C) preference for smaller, explicit theories vs global, syndromatic theories with issues of precision vs comprehensiveness, (D) prepreference for limited & controlled change induction vs massive & powerful change induction, (E) preference for `near' vs 'distant' criteria re the number of hyp'ed links in the causal chain of variables being investigated, (F) preference for self-selected vs independently-selected S org's, & (G) weighing of technical design consideration vs ethical & practical considerations in conducting the field work. It is suggested that at the present primitive stage of development in exp'tion with org's, priority should be given to simplicity of design & to the opportunistic search for res sites that ease these dilemmas. Modified AA.]]></description><subject>Control units</subject><subject>Experiment design</subject><subject>Experiment/Experiments/Experimental/ Experimenter/ Experimentation/ Experimentalism</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Field</subject><subject>Field experiments</subject><subject>Field Methods and Techniques</subject><subject>Formal organization</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Organization/Organizations/ Organizational/ Organize/ Organizers/ Organized/ Organizing</subject><subject>Organizational theory</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Seashores</subject><issn>0018-7259</issn><issn>1938-3525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1964</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QSgMvJHWk482DV7J2FQY7EavQ5KlrqVtZtIy9dcbnXixq3BynvdwzoPQDEOGOadwtx07lxGakWxDOWcYU8yacs-wP0ETLGiZ0pzkp2gCgMuUk1yco4sQGgBg8WeCbpe1bTfJ4mNnfd3ZfgjJvh62ydL5TrXJ2r-pvv5SQ-36cInOKtUGe_X3TtHrcvEyf0pX68fn-cMqNYQXQ2orBVDmnHEhDNYbxotYamwEI4WCglrKlKEacKW14RWtdKWJNlSVQGzsTNHNYe7Ou_fRhkF2dTC2bVVv3RhkAbnAQHEEZ0dg40bfx91kFAFEMOA0UvcHyngXgreV3MVTlf-UGOSvRvmjURIqiTzWGNPXh3QTBuf_o4xhwgQX9BtalHHG</recordid><startdate>19640701</startdate><enddate>19640701</enddate><creator>Seashore, Stanley E.</creator><creator>eSashore, Stanley E.</creator><general>The Society for Applied Anthropology</general><general>Society for Applied Anthropology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ADABO</scope><scope>BEAJS</scope><scope>HAWNG</scope><scope>HBMBR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JILTI</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDPSG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PEXHY</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMFND</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVKVW</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SAAPM</scope><scope>~P9</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19640701</creationdate><title>Field Experiments with Formal Organizations</title><author>Seashore, Stanley E. ; eSashore, Stanley E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-efa008574799c1bd476085b1c9426a063e34ac3b01fbbc7f3fbfb2bc3a802eac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1964</creationdate><topic>Control units</topic><topic>Experiment design</topic><topic>Experiment/Experiments/Experimental/ Experimenter/ Experimentation/ Experimentalism</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Field</topic><topic>Field experiments</topic><topic>Field Methods and Techniques</topic><topic>Formal organization</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Organization/Organizations/ Organizational/ Organize/ Organizers/ Organized/ Organizing</topic><topic>Organizational theory</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Seashores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seashore, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>eSashore, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 13</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 14</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 32</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 9.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 3.2</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>ProQuest One History</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals Collection</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 42</collection><collection>PAO Collection 9</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Human organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seashore, Stanley E.</au><au>eSashore, Stanley E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field Experiments with Formal Organizations</atitle><jtitle>Human organization</jtitle><date>1964-07-01</date><risdate>1964</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>164-170</pages><issn>0018-7259</issn><eissn>1938-3525</eissn><coden>HUORAY</coden><abstract><![CDATA[3 recent field exp's are described briefly & compared re: (1) criteria for choice of S org's, (2) contrived vs natural approach to change, (3) nature & theoretical character of the change, control & criterion variables, (4) the instit'al, org'al, socpsychol'al or individual level of the theory, (5) the duration of the experiment in time, & (6) the analysis strategy for testing causal hyp's. The dilemmas discussed are thought to be not unique to field exp's with complex org's, but more troublesome in such exp's than in laboratory or small group exp's: (A) preference for control vs representativeness in choice of S org's, (B) choice of short-term vs long-duration exp'al periods with risks of insufficient change vs intrustion of disturbing events, (C) preference for smaller, explicit theories vs global, syndromatic theories with issues of precision vs comprehensiveness, (D) prepreference for limited & controlled change induction vs massive & powerful change induction, (E) preference for `near' vs 'distant' criteria re the number of hyp'ed links in the causal chain of variables being investigated, (F) preference for self-selected vs independently-selected S org's, & (G) weighing of technical design consideration vs ethical & practical considerations in conducting the field work. It is suggested that at the present primitive stage of development in exp'tion with org's, priority should be given to simplicity of design & to the opportunistic search for res sites that ease these dilemmas. Modified AA.]]></abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>The Society for Applied Anthropology</pub><doi>10.17730/humo.23.2.d377411314j8w41r</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7259
ispartof Human organization, 1964-07, Vol.23 (2), p.164-170
issn 0018-7259
1938-3525
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60591031
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Control units
Experiment design
Experiment/Experiments/Experimental/ Experimenter/ Experimentation/ Experimentalism
Experimentation
Field
Field experiments
Field Methods and Techniques
Formal organization
Job performance
Organization/Organizations/ Organizational/ Organize/ Organizers/ Organized/ Organizing
Organizational theory
Population size
Research design
Seashores
title Field Experiments with Formal Organizations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-04T11%3A53%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20Experiments%20with%20Formal%20Organizations&rft.jtitle=Human%20organization&rft.au=Seashore,%20Stanley%20E.&rft.date=1964-07-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=164-170&rft.issn=0018-7259&rft.eissn=1938-3525&rft.coden=HUORAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.17730/humo.23.2.d377411314j8w41r&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44124979%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-efa008574799c1bd476085b1c9426a063e34ac3b01fbbc7f3fbfb2bc3a802eac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1310294073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44124979&rfr_iscdi=true