Loading…
The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action
This study sought to more fully explicate the key variables involved in Noelle-Neumann's spiral of silence theory, which states that fear of isolation keeps individuals from expressing opinions perceived to be in the minority. We tested the theory in the context of public discussion about affir...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journalism & mass communication quarterly 2001-04, Vol.78 (1), p.7-25 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-4a4ad4953c4846d1ca895ae2aade17036278215b1b5aec7e7e723d0deec39e383 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 25 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | Journalism & mass communication quarterly |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Moy, Patricia Domke, David Stamm, Keith |
description | This study sought to more fully explicate the key variables involved in Noelle-Neumann's spiral of silence theory, which states that fear of isolation keeps individuals from expressing opinions perceived to be in the minority. We tested the theory in the context of public discussion about affirmative action policies, a domain seemingly ideal due to its moral and value-laden characteristics. Data from 217 randomly selected adults in October 1998 indicate that fear of isolation indeed prevents one from publicly voicing perceived minority opinions. Willingness to speak out on a controversial ballot initiative was predicted also by demographics, media use, and importance of the issue. However, it was perceived consonance of one's opinion with family and friends—rather than society at large—that predicted willingness to speak out. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/107769900107800102 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60618719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_107769900107800102</sage_id><sourcerecordid>75436424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-4a4ad4953c4846d1ca895ae2aade17036278215b1b5aec7e7e723d0deec39e383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNtKw0AQhhdRsFZfwKvFC-9i95Q93AileIJChVbwLmw3E92SJnE3FXx7N1QQFJQZZobh-wfmR-ickitKlZpQopQ0hpA06KGyAzRiVNJMcPJ8iEYDkA3EMTqJcUMGRtMRul69Al52PtgatxVe-hoaB9g2JX7crWvv8KLzjW8bnHJaVT5sbe_fAU9dn7an6KiydYSzrz5GT7c3q9l9Nl_cPcym88xxJfpMWGFLYXLuhBaypM5qk1tg1pZAFeGSKc1ovqbrtHUKUjBekhLAcQNc8zG63N_tQvu2g9gXWx8d1LVtoN3FQhJJtaLmXzBXec6EVAm8-AFu2l1o0hNF8s0wbSRPENtDLrQxBqiKLvitDR8FJcVgfPHb-CSa7EXRvsD31T8Un2wigMU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216928963</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Library & Information Science Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Humanities Index</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Moy, Patricia ; Domke, David ; Stamm, Keith</creator><creatorcontrib>Moy, Patricia ; Domke, David ; Stamm, Keith</creatorcontrib><description>This study sought to more fully explicate the key variables involved in Noelle-Neumann's spiral of silence theory, which states that fear of isolation keeps individuals from expressing opinions perceived to be in the minority. We tested the theory in the context of public discussion about affirmative action policies, a domain seemingly ideal due to its moral and value-laden characteristics. Data from 217 randomly selected adults in October 1998 indicate that fear of isolation indeed prevents one from publicly voicing perceived minority opinions. Willingness to speak out on a controversial ballot initiative was predicted also by demographics, media use, and importance of the issue. However, it was perceived consonance of one's opinion with family and friends—rather than society at large—that predicted willingness to speak out.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-6990</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-430X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/107769900107800102</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOQUAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Affirmative Action ; Attitude Change ; Attitudes ; College students ; Communication ; Conformity ; Control Groups ; Experiments ; Fear ; Gender ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Media coverage ; News Media ; News Reporting ; Public Opinion ; Race ; Reference Groups ; Rejection (Psychology) ; Social Behavior ; Social Control ; Social Integration ; Social Isolation ; Society ; Theory ; Washington (State)</subject><ispartof>Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 2001-04, Vol.78 (1), p.7-25</ispartof><rights>2001 Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication</rights><rights>Copyright Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Spring 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-4a4ad4953c4846d1ca895ae2aade17036278215b1b5aec7e7e723d0deec39e383</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/216928963/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/216928963?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,11669,12129,12828,21359,21362,21375,27905,27906,33204,33592,33593,33830,33858,33859,33887,33888,34117,36041,36042,43714,43861,43873,44344,73970,74146,74158,74644,79113</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moy, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domke, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamm, Keith</creatorcontrib><title>The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action</title><title>Journalism & mass communication quarterly</title><description>This study sought to more fully explicate the key variables involved in Noelle-Neumann's spiral of silence theory, which states that fear of isolation keeps individuals from expressing opinions perceived to be in the minority. We tested the theory in the context of public discussion about affirmative action policies, a domain seemingly ideal due to its moral and value-laden characteristics. Data from 217 randomly selected adults in October 1998 indicate that fear of isolation indeed prevents one from publicly voicing perceived minority opinions. Willingness to speak out on a controversial ballot initiative was predicted also by demographics, media use, and importance of the issue. However, it was perceived consonance of one's opinion with family and friends—rather than society at large—that predicted willingness to speak out.</description><subject>Affirmative Action</subject><subject>Attitude Change</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Conformity</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Media coverage</subject><subject>News Media</subject><subject>News Reporting</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Reference Groups</subject><subject>Rejection (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social Control</subject><subject>Social Integration</subject><subject>Social Isolation</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Washington (State)</subject><issn>1077-6990</issn><issn>2161-430X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>C18</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNtKw0AQhhdRsFZfwKvFC-9i95Q93AileIJChVbwLmw3E92SJnE3FXx7N1QQFJQZZobh-wfmR-ickitKlZpQopQ0hpA06KGyAzRiVNJMcPJ8iEYDkA3EMTqJcUMGRtMRul69Al52PtgatxVe-hoaB9g2JX7crWvv8KLzjW8bnHJaVT5sbe_fAU9dn7an6KiydYSzrz5GT7c3q9l9Nl_cPcym88xxJfpMWGFLYXLuhBaypM5qk1tg1pZAFeGSKc1ovqbrtHUKUjBekhLAcQNc8zG63N_tQvu2g9gXWx8d1LVtoN3FQhJJtaLmXzBXec6EVAm8-AFu2l1o0hNF8s0wbSRPENtDLrQxBqiKLvitDR8FJcVgfPHb-CSa7EXRvsD31T8Un2wigMU</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>Moy, Patricia</creator><creator>Domke, David</creator><creator>Stamm, Keith</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action</title><author>Moy, Patricia ; Domke, David ; Stamm, Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-4a4ad4953c4846d1ca895ae2aade17036278215b1b5aec7e7e723d0deec39e383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Affirmative Action</topic><topic>Attitude Change</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Conformity</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Media coverage</topic><topic>News Media</topic><topic>News Reporting</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Reference Groups</topic><topic>Rejection (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social Control</topic><topic>Social Integration</topic><topic>Social Isolation</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Washington (State)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moy, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domke, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamm, Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Homework Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journalism & mass communication quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moy, Patricia</au><au>Domke, David</au><au>Stamm, Keith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action</atitle><jtitle>Journalism & mass communication quarterly</jtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>7-25</pages><issn>1077-6990</issn><eissn>2161-430X</eissn><coden>JOQUAX</coden><abstract>This study sought to more fully explicate the key variables involved in Noelle-Neumann's spiral of silence theory, which states that fear of isolation keeps individuals from expressing opinions perceived to be in the minority. We tested the theory in the context of public discussion about affirmative action policies, a domain seemingly ideal due to its moral and value-laden characteristics. Data from 217 randomly selected adults in October 1998 indicate that fear of isolation indeed prevents one from publicly voicing perceived minority opinions. Willingness to speak out on a controversial ballot initiative was predicted also by demographics, media use, and importance of the issue. However, it was perceived consonance of one's opinion with family and friends—rather than society at large—that predicted willingness to speak out.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/107769900107800102</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1077-6990 |
ispartof | Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 2001-04, Vol.78 (1), p.7-25 |
issn | 1077-6990 2161-430X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60618719 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ABI/INFORM Collection; Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Library & Information Science Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Humanities Index; SAGE |
subjects | Affirmative Action Attitude Change Attitudes College students Communication Conformity Control Groups Experiments Fear Gender Interpersonal Relationship Media coverage News Media News Reporting Public Opinion Race Reference Groups Rejection (Psychology) Social Behavior Social Control Social Integration Social Isolation Society Theory Washington (State) |
title | The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A40%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Spiral%20of%20Silence%20and%20Public%20Opinion%20on%20Affirmative%20Action&rft.jtitle=Journalism%20&%20mass%20communication%20quarterly&rft.au=Moy,%20Patricia&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=7-25&rft.issn=1077-6990&rft.eissn=2161-430X&rft.coden=JOQUAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/107769900107800102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75436424%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-4a4ad4953c4846d1ca895ae2aade17036278215b1b5aec7e7e723d0deec39e383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216928963&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_107769900107800102&rfr_iscdi=true |