How "Civil" is Civil Society? Authoritarian State, Partisan Civil Society, and the Struggle for Democratic Development in Bangladesh

This paper disputes the widely held assumption that civil society is the site for democracy and development. By exploring the emerging case of Bangladesh, it calk into question the popular belief that civil society aims to protect the interests of ordinary citizens. While it recognizes the ability o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revue canadienne d'études du développement 2003-01, Vol.24 (3), p.425-438
Main Author: Quadir, Fahimul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Authoritarianism
Bangladesh
Civil Society
Democracy
Government
Nation state
Political Development
Politics & government
Society
State Society Relationship
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper disputes the widely held assumption that civil society is the site for democracy and development. By exploring the emerging case of Bangladesh, it calk into question the popular belief that civil society aims to protect the interests of ordinary citizens. While it recognizes the ability of civil society groups to create a political space necessary for bringing the poor out of poverty, it challenges the notion that civil society maintains its autonomy vis-à-vis the state and other political forces.
ISSN:0225-5189
2158-9100
DOI:10.1080/02255189.2003.9668930