Polling and Policy Analysis as Resources for Advocacy

Between 1995 and 2001, the California Center for Health Improvement (CCHI) initiated eight large-scale surveys of public opinion and performed policy analyses on issues and alternatives related to population health. A nonpartisan organization, CCHI aimed to advance the understanding of social factor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of public administration research and theory 2003-04, Vol.13 (2), p.177-191
Main Authors: Greenwald, Howard P., Beery, William L., Pearson, Dave, Senter, Sandra, Cheadle, Allen, Nelson, Gary D., Bodenhorn, Karen, Horiuchi, Catherine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Advocacy
California
Decision making
Health
Health Policy
Medical specialists
Opinion Polls
Policy Analysis
Policy Making
Political sociology
Polls
Polls & surveys
Population health
Public administration
Public opinion
Public opinion polls
Public policy
Resource analysis
Upper houses
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Between 1995 and 2001, the California Center for Health Improvement (CCHI) initiated eight large-scale surveys of public opinion and performed policy analyses on issues and alternatives related to population health. A nonpartisan organization, CCHI aimed to advance the understanding of social factors and behavior as determinants of health and promote this understanding as a factor in policy making. Opinions of persons knowledgeable about policy making in California were obtained. Data included ninety brief interviews and twentyfour in-depth interviews with key informants who were capable of judging the impact of CCHI's activity. The entry of CCHI into the Sacramento policy community constitutes a natural experiment on the deliberate use of polls and policy analysis to influence policy. Key informants indicated that both polls and policy analysis affect the actions of policy makers. More than 48 percent believed that opinion polls "moderately" affected and 42.2 percent believed that opinion polls "strongly" affected the actions of policy makers. More than 58 percent indicated that policy analysis "moderately" affected and 33.7 percent believed that policy analysis "strongly" affected policy decisions. Effects of polling and policy analysis appeared to vary according to several contextual factors, such as the substantive policy issue, point in the legislative cycle, and perceived neutrality of the poll or analysis. Study findings provide evidence that polls and policy analyses affect policy by helping establish visibility and framing issues rather than determining outcomes. Hypotheses under a contingency model of factors in policy decision making are suggested.
ISSN:1053-1858
1477-9803
DOI:10.1093/jopart/mug016