Loading…
Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level
Civil society development in Eastern Europe has most often been studied as a comparison among countries but has seldom been addressed on a sub-national level. The researchers ask whether the development of civil society in Transylvania is different from that in the rest of Romania and, if so, whethe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Europe-Asia studies 2005-01, Vol.57 (1), p.117-133 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-162ede15bbb9d1aabad638e529ca9ba3bb9c09fc7a19c47849ab89f83767f5223 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 133 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 117 |
container_title | Europe-Asia studies |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Bădescu, Gabriel Sum, Paul |
description | Civil society development in Eastern Europe has most often been studied as a comparison among countries but has seldom been addressed on a sub-national level. The researchers ask whether the development of civil society in Transylvania is different from that in the rest of Romania and, if so, whether this difference can be attributed to differences in social capital. The historically-rooted cultural difference between Transylvania and the rest of the country, which predates the communist period, drives the hypothesized relationship. If this proposition is valid, the finding holds significance for civil society development strategy in Romania and people's understanding of political development in new democracies. With the overthrow of the communist regimes, the new democracies of Eastern Europe witnessed the emergence (re-emergence) of regional distinctions which are congruent with historical, cultural and institutional legacies. For Romania the region of Transylvania stands out in this respect from the rest of the country. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0966813052000314138 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60680826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30043854</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30043854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-162ede15bbb9d1aabad638e529ca9ba3bb9c09fc7a19c47849ab89f83767f5223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJoZu0v6AUTA491e1IsmWph0IwTVJYKGzbW0GMZXnRYltbybvp_vvIu6GHEJrTwMzzvvNFyFsKHylI-ARKCEk5lAwAOC0oly_IghaizHnBqjOymIk8IeIVOY9xkzAoS74gv29dnHxwBvtsaddonI0fsh_euJSoceumFHFss9rtXX8s2OnwOav9sMXgxnW28gOODjM_Zpit7Nr58ei1t_1r8rLDPto3D_GC_Lr--rO-zZffb77VV8vcpAmnnApmW0vLpmlUSxEbbAWXtmTKoGqQp7QB1ZkKqTJFJQuFjVSd5JWoupIxfkHen3y3wf_Z2TjpwUVj-x5H63dRCxASJBPPglwCr5gsEnj5CNz4XUiLRT2fmDEKsxs_QSb4GIPt9Da4AcNBU9DzX_QTf0mqdyfVZj78PwkHKLgs59bqVHdj58OAdz70rZ7w0PvQBRyNi0_56unvlLRfntXy_w13D87Wrns</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200022106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Bădescu, Gabriel ; Sum, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Bădescu, Gabriel ; Sum, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Civil society development in Eastern Europe has most often been studied as a comparison among countries but has seldom been addressed on a sub-national level. The researchers ask whether the development of civil society in Transylvania is different from that in the rest of Romania and, if so, whether this difference can be attributed to differences in social capital. The historically-rooted cultural difference between Transylvania and the rest of the country, which predates the communist period, drives the hypothesized relationship. If this proposition is valid, the finding holds significance for civil society development strategy in Romania and people's understanding of political development in new democracies. With the overthrow of the communist regimes, the new democracies of Eastern Europe witnessed the emergence (re-emergence) of regional distinctions which are congruent with historical, cultural and institutional legacies. For Romania the region of Transylvania stands out in this respect from the rest of the country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-8136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0966813052000314138</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EASTER</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Civil Society ; Communism ; Countries ; Crossnational Analysis ; Cultural Capital ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Economic Development ; Ethnicity ; Legacies ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Political Development ; Political history ; Political participation ; Post-communist societies ; Postcommunism ; Postcommunist Societies ; Regional Development ; Regional disparities ; Regionalism ; Romania ; Social capital ; Social change ; Social conditions & trends ; Social Development ; Studies ; Trust ; Volunteerism</subject><ispartof>Europe-Asia studies, 2005-01, Vol.57 (1), p.117-133</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 University of Glasgow</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Jan 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-162ede15bbb9d1aabad638e529ca9ba3bb9c09fc7a19c47849ab89f83767f5223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30043854$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30043854$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bădescu, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sum, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level</title><title>Europe-Asia studies</title><description>Civil society development in Eastern Europe has most often been studied as a comparison among countries but has seldom been addressed on a sub-national level. The researchers ask whether the development of civil society in Transylvania is different from that in the rest of Romania and, if so, whether this difference can be attributed to differences in social capital. The historically-rooted cultural difference between Transylvania and the rest of the country, which predates the communist period, drives the hypothesized relationship. If this proposition is valid, the finding holds significance for civil society development strategy in Romania and people's understanding of political development in new democracies. With the overthrow of the communist regimes, the new democracies of Eastern Europe witnessed the emergence (re-emergence) of regional distinctions which are congruent with historical, cultural and institutional legacies. For Romania the region of Transylvania stands out in this respect from the rest of the country.</description><subject>Civil Society</subject><subject>Communism</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Crossnational Analysis</subject><subject>Cultural Capital</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Legacies</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Political Development</subject><subject>Political history</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Post-communist societies</subject><subject>Postcommunism</subject><subject>Postcommunist Societies</subject><subject>Regional Development</subject><subject>Regional disparities</subject><subject>Regionalism</subject><subject>Romania</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social conditions & trends</subject><subject>Social Development</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Volunteerism</subject><issn>0966-8136</issn><issn>1465-3427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJoZu0v6AUTA491e1IsmWph0IwTVJYKGzbW0GMZXnRYltbybvp_vvIu6GHEJrTwMzzvvNFyFsKHylI-ARKCEk5lAwAOC0oly_IghaizHnBqjOymIk8IeIVOY9xkzAoS74gv29dnHxwBvtsaddonI0fsh_euJSoceumFHFss9rtXX8s2OnwOav9sMXgxnW28gOODjM_Zpit7Nr58ei1t_1r8rLDPto3D_GC_Lr--rO-zZffb77VV8vcpAmnnApmW0vLpmlUSxEbbAWXtmTKoGqQp7QB1ZkKqTJFJQuFjVSd5JWoupIxfkHen3y3wf_Z2TjpwUVj-x5H63dRCxASJBPPglwCr5gsEnj5CNz4XUiLRT2fmDEKsxs_QSb4GIPt9Da4AcNBU9DzX_QTf0mqdyfVZj78PwkHKLgs59bqVHdj58OAdz70rZ7w0PvQBRyNi0_56unvlLRfntXy_w13D87Wrns</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Bădescu, Gabriel</creator><creator>Sum, Paul</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level</title><author>Bădescu, Gabriel ; Sum, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-162ede15bbb9d1aabad638e529ca9ba3bb9c09fc7a19c47849ab89f83767f5223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Civil Society</topic><topic>Communism</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Crossnational Analysis</topic><topic>Cultural Capital</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Legacies</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Political Development</topic><topic>Political history</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Post-communist societies</topic><topic>Postcommunism</topic><topic>Postcommunist Societies</topic><topic>Regional Development</topic><topic>Regional disparities</topic><topic>Regionalism</topic><topic>Romania</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social conditions & trends</topic><topic>Social Development</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Volunteerism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bădescu, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sum, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Europe-Asia studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bădescu, Gabriel</au><au>Sum, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level</atitle><jtitle>Europe-Asia studies</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>117-133</pages><issn>0966-8136</issn><eissn>1465-3427</eissn><coden>EASTER</coden><abstract>Civil society development in Eastern Europe has most often been studied as a comparison among countries but has seldom been addressed on a sub-national level. The researchers ask whether the development of civil society in Transylvania is different from that in the rest of Romania and, if so, whether this difference can be attributed to differences in social capital. The historically-rooted cultural difference between Transylvania and the rest of the country, which predates the communist period, drives the hypothesized relationship. If this proposition is valid, the finding holds significance for civil society development strategy in Romania and people's understanding of political development in new democracies. With the overthrow of the communist regimes, the new democracies of Eastern Europe witnessed the emergence (re-emergence) of regional distinctions which are congruent with historical, cultural and institutional legacies. For Romania the region of Transylvania stands out in this respect from the rest of the country.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/0966813052000314138</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0966-8136 |
ispartof | Europe-Asia studies, 2005-01, Vol.57 (1), p.117-133 |
issn | 0966-8136 1465-3427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60680826 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archival Journals; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Civil Society Communism Countries Crossnational Analysis Cultural Capital Democracy Democratization Economic Development Ethnicity Legacies Nongovernmental organizations Political Development Political history Political participation Post-communist societies Postcommunism Postcommunist Societies Regional Development Regional disparities Regionalism Romania Social capital Social change Social conditions & trends Social Development Studies Trust Volunteerism |
title | Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A16%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Historical%20Legacies,%20Social%20Capital%20and%20Civil%20Society:%20Comparing%20Romania%20on%20a%20Regional%20Level&rft.jtitle=Europe-Asia%20studies&rft.au=B%C4%83descu,%20Gabriel&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=117-133&rft.issn=0966-8136&rft.eissn=1465-3427&rft.coden=EASTER&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0966813052000314138&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30043854%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-162ede15bbb9d1aabad638e529ca9ba3bb9c09fc7a19c47849ab89f83767f5223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200022106&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=30043854&rfr_iscdi=true |