Loading…

Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level

Civil society development in Eastern Europe has most often been studied as a comparison among countries but has seldom been addressed on a sub-national level. The researchers ask whether the development of civil society in Transylvania is different from that in the rest of Romania and, if so, whethe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Europe-Asia studies 2005-01, Vol.57 (1), p.117-133
Main Authors: Bădescu, Gabriel, Sum, Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-162ede15bbb9d1aabad638e529ca9ba3bb9c09fc7a19c47849ab89f83767f5223
cites
container_end_page 133
container_issue 1
container_start_page 117
container_title Europe-Asia studies
container_volume 57
creator Bădescu, Gabriel
Sum, Paul
description Civil society development in Eastern Europe has most often been studied as a comparison among countries but has seldom been addressed on a sub-national level. The researchers ask whether the development of civil society in Transylvania is different from that in the rest of Romania and, if so, whether this difference can be attributed to differences in social capital. The historically-rooted cultural difference between Transylvania and the rest of the country, which predates the communist period, drives the hypothesized relationship. If this proposition is valid, the finding holds significance for civil society development strategy in Romania and people's understanding of political development in new democracies. With the overthrow of the communist regimes, the new democracies of Eastern Europe witnessed the emergence (re-emergence) of regional distinctions which are congruent with historical, cultural and institutional legacies. For Romania the region of Transylvania stands out in this respect from the rest of the country.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0966813052000314138
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60680826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30043854</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30043854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-162ede15bbb9d1aabad638e529ca9ba3bb9c09fc7a19c47849ab89f83767f5223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJoZu0v6AUTA491e1IsmWph0IwTVJYKGzbW0GMZXnRYltbybvp_vvIu6GHEJrTwMzzvvNFyFsKHylI-ARKCEk5lAwAOC0oly_IghaizHnBqjOymIk8IeIVOY9xkzAoS74gv29dnHxwBvtsaddonI0fsh_euJSoceumFHFss9rtXX8s2OnwOav9sMXgxnW28gOODjM_Zpit7Nr58ei1t_1r8rLDPto3D_GC_Lr--rO-zZffb77VV8vcpAmnnApmW0vLpmlUSxEbbAWXtmTKoGqQp7QB1ZkKqTJFJQuFjVSd5JWoupIxfkHen3y3wf_Z2TjpwUVj-x5H63dRCxASJBPPglwCr5gsEnj5CNz4XUiLRT2fmDEKsxs_QSb4GIPt9Da4AcNBU9DzX_QTf0mqdyfVZj78PwkHKLgs59bqVHdj58OAdz70rZ7w0PvQBRyNi0_56unvlLRfntXy_w13D87Wrns</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200022106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Bădescu, Gabriel ; Sum, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Bădescu, Gabriel ; Sum, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Civil society development in Eastern Europe has most often been studied as a comparison among countries but has seldom been addressed on a sub-national level. The researchers ask whether the development of civil society in Transylvania is different from that in the rest of Romania and, if so, whether this difference can be attributed to differences in social capital. The historically-rooted cultural difference between Transylvania and the rest of the country, which predates the communist period, drives the hypothesized relationship. If this proposition is valid, the finding holds significance for civil society development strategy in Romania and people's understanding of political development in new democracies. With the overthrow of the communist regimes, the new democracies of Eastern Europe witnessed the emergence (re-emergence) of regional distinctions which are congruent with historical, cultural and institutional legacies. For Romania the region of Transylvania stands out in this respect from the rest of the country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-8136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0966813052000314138</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EASTER</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Civil Society ; Communism ; Countries ; Crossnational Analysis ; Cultural Capital ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Economic Development ; Ethnicity ; Legacies ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Political Development ; Political history ; Political participation ; Post-communist societies ; Postcommunism ; Postcommunist Societies ; Regional Development ; Regional disparities ; Regionalism ; Romania ; Social capital ; Social change ; Social conditions &amp; trends ; Social Development ; Studies ; Trust ; Volunteerism</subject><ispartof>Europe-Asia studies, 2005-01, Vol.57 (1), p.117-133</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 University of Glasgow</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Jan 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-162ede15bbb9d1aabad638e529ca9ba3bb9c09fc7a19c47849ab89f83767f5223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30043854$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30043854$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bădescu, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sum, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level</title><title>Europe-Asia studies</title><description>Civil society development in Eastern Europe has most often been studied as a comparison among countries but has seldom been addressed on a sub-national level. The researchers ask whether the development of civil society in Transylvania is different from that in the rest of Romania and, if so, whether this difference can be attributed to differences in social capital. The historically-rooted cultural difference between Transylvania and the rest of the country, which predates the communist period, drives the hypothesized relationship. If this proposition is valid, the finding holds significance for civil society development strategy in Romania and people's understanding of political development in new democracies. With the overthrow of the communist regimes, the new democracies of Eastern Europe witnessed the emergence (re-emergence) of regional distinctions which are congruent with historical, cultural and institutional legacies. For Romania the region of Transylvania stands out in this respect from the rest of the country.</description><subject>Civil Society</subject><subject>Communism</subject><subject>Countries</subject><subject>Crossnational Analysis</subject><subject>Cultural Capital</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Legacies</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Political Development</subject><subject>Political history</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Post-communist societies</subject><subject>Postcommunism</subject><subject>Postcommunist Societies</subject><subject>Regional Development</subject><subject>Regional disparities</subject><subject>Regionalism</subject><subject>Romania</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social conditions &amp; trends</subject><subject>Social Development</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Volunteerism</subject><issn>0966-8136</issn><issn>1465-3427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJoZu0v6AUTA491e1IsmWph0IwTVJYKGzbW0GMZXnRYltbybvp_vvIu6GHEJrTwMzzvvNFyFsKHylI-ARKCEk5lAwAOC0oly_IghaizHnBqjOymIk8IeIVOY9xkzAoS74gv29dnHxwBvtsaddonI0fsh_euJSoceumFHFss9rtXX8s2OnwOav9sMXgxnW28gOODjM_Zpit7Nr58ei1t_1r8rLDPto3D_GC_Lr--rO-zZffb77VV8vcpAmnnApmW0vLpmlUSxEbbAWXtmTKoGqQp7QB1ZkKqTJFJQuFjVSd5JWoupIxfkHen3y3wf_Z2TjpwUVj-x5H63dRCxASJBPPglwCr5gsEnj5CNz4XUiLRT2fmDEKsxs_QSb4GIPt9Da4AcNBU9DzX_QTf0mqdyfVZj78PwkHKLgs59bqVHdj58OAdz70rZ7w0PvQBRyNi0_56unvlLRfntXy_w13D87Wrns</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Bădescu, Gabriel</creator><creator>Sum, Paul</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level</title><author>Bădescu, Gabriel ; Sum, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-162ede15bbb9d1aabad638e529ca9ba3bb9c09fc7a19c47849ab89f83767f5223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Civil Society</topic><topic>Communism</topic><topic>Countries</topic><topic>Crossnational Analysis</topic><topic>Cultural Capital</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Legacies</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Political Development</topic><topic>Political history</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Post-communist societies</topic><topic>Postcommunism</topic><topic>Postcommunist Societies</topic><topic>Regional Development</topic><topic>Regional disparities</topic><topic>Regionalism</topic><topic>Romania</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social conditions &amp; trends</topic><topic>Social Development</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Volunteerism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bădescu, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sum, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Europe-Asia studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bădescu, Gabriel</au><au>Sum, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level</atitle><jtitle>Europe-Asia studies</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>117-133</pages><issn>0966-8136</issn><eissn>1465-3427</eissn><coden>EASTER</coden><abstract>Civil society development in Eastern Europe has most often been studied as a comparison among countries but has seldom been addressed on a sub-national level. The researchers ask whether the development of civil society in Transylvania is different from that in the rest of Romania and, if so, whether this difference can be attributed to differences in social capital. The historically-rooted cultural difference between Transylvania and the rest of the country, which predates the communist period, drives the hypothesized relationship. If this proposition is valid, the finding holds significance for civil society development strategy in Romania and people's understanding of political development in new democracies. With the overthrow of the communist regimes, the new democracies of Eastern Europe witnessed the emergence (re-emergence) of regional distinctions which are congruent with historical, cultural and institutional legacies. For Romania the region of Transylvania stands out in this respect from the rest of the country.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/0966813052000314138</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-8136
ispartof Europe-Asia studies, 2005-01, Vol.57 (1), p.117-133
issn 0966-8136
1465-3427
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60680826
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archival Journals; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Civil Society
Communism
Countries
Crossnational Analysis
Cultural Capital
Democracy
Democratization
Economic Development
Ethnicity
Legacies
Nongovernmental organizations
Political Development
Political history
Political participation
Post-communist societies
Postcommunism
Postcommunist Societies
Regional Development
Regional disparities
Regionalism
Romania
Social capital
Social change
Social conditions & trends
Social Development
Studies
Trust
Volunteerism
title Historical Legacies, Social Capital and Civil Society: Comparing Romania on a Regional Level
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A16%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Historical%20Legacies,%20Social%20Capital%20and%20Civil%20Society:%20Comparing%20Romania%20on%20a%20Regional%20Level&rft.jtitle=Europe-Asia%20studies&rft.au=B%C4%83descu,%20Gabriel&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=117-133&rft.issn=0966-8136&rft.eissn=1465-3427&rft.coden=EASTER&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0966813052000314138&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30043854%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-162ede15bbb9d1aabad638e529ca9ba3bb9c09fc7a19c47849ab89f83767f5223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200022106&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=30043854&rfr_iscdi=true