Loading…
Rationalizing the California Recall
Popular interpretations of the 2003 CA gubernatorial recall election as a typical gubernatorial election or as the Republican Party's manipulation of political processes are challenged. An overview of the recall election is presented, demonstrating its resemblance to initiatives, referenda, &am...
Saved in:
Published in: | PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2004-01, Vol.37 (1), p.19-21 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1e43b4a5b57870f5c0483491805937f3d1dc4d63e6a2dab64ff0f1cf1794bc953 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 21 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | PS, political science & politics |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Stone, Walter J. Datta, Monti Narayan |
description | Popular interpretations of the 2003 CA gubernatorial recall election as a typical gubernatorial election or as the Republican Party's manipulation of political processes are challenged. An overview of the recall election is presented, demonstrating its resemblance to initiatives, referenda, & primary elections. Analysis of the results of the 2002 general election & the 2003 recall election is conducted, indicating the effects of several indicators -- racial identity, employment status, support for Davis in the 2002 election, party affiliation, & support for Ross Perot in the 1992 US presidential election -- upon voters' preferences. Several findings are revealed: Latino American & African American voters withdrew their traditionally high level of support for Democrats; unemployment status had a greater effect upon support for Davis in the 2002 election; & support for Perot & support for Davis's recall were positively correlated. It is concluded that the CA recall election bears a strong resemblance to a referendum. 1 Table, 1 Figure, 1 Reference. J. W. Parker |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1049096504003555 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60698399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1049096504003555</cupid><jstor_id>4488755</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4488755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1e43b4a5b57870f5c0483491805937f3d1dc4d63e6a2dab64ff0f1cf1794bc953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QHBRENyN3pjXZCnFtkpBrI9tyGSSmjqdqckU1F9v6pRuBO8mN3znXA4HoVMMlxiwuHrCQCVIzoACEMbYHuphRkTGJGH7aU842_BDdBTjAtLkDHrofKZb39S68t--ng_aNzsYpo9rQu31YGaNrqpjdOB0Fe3J9u2jl9Ht83CSTR_Gd8ObaWYIyDbDlpKCalYwkQtwzADNCZU4h5RBOFLi0tCSE8v1dakLTp0Dh43DQtLCSEb66KK7uwrNx9rGVi19NLaqdG2bdVQcuMyJlEmIO6EJTYzBOrUKfqnDl8KgNnWoP3Ukz1nnWcS2CTsDpXkufnHWYR9b-7nDOrwrLohgio8f1eT-lcrZFCue9GQbQS-L4Mu5VYtmHVKR8Z8QP-ZVeCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60698399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rationalizing the California Recall</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Stone, Walter J. ; Datta, Monti Narayan</creator><creatorcontrib>Stone, Walter J. ; Datta, Monti Narayan</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Popular interpretations of the 2003 CA gubernatorial recall election as a typical gubernatorial election or as the Republican Party's manipulation of political processes are challenged. An overview of the recall election is presented, demonstrating its resemblance to initiatives, referenda, & primary elections. Analysis of the results of the 2002 general election & the 2003 recall election is conducted, indicating the effects of several indicators -- racial identity, employment status, support for Davis in the 2002 election, party affiliation, & support for Ross Perot in the 1992 US presidential election -- upon voters' preferences. Several findings are revealed: Latino American & African American voters withdrew their traditionally high level of support for Democrats; unemployment status had a greater effect upon support for Davis in the 2002 election; & support for Perot & support for Davis's recall were positively correlated. It is concluded that the CA recall election bears a strong resemblance to a referendum. 1 Table, 1 Figure, 1 Reference. J. W. Parker]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049096504003555</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Ballots ; California ; Candidates ; Elections ; Governors ; Political campaigns ; Political candidates ; Political elections ; Political partisanship ; Public Support ; Recall ; Recall elections ; Referendum ; Referendums ; Symposium ; Symposium: Recalling the Recall: Reflections on California's Recent Political Adventure ; Voter registration ; Voting ; Voting Behavior</subject><ispartof>PS, political science & politics, 2004-01, Vol.37 (1), p.19-21</ispartof><rights>2004 by the American Political Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 American Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1e43b4a5b57870f5c0483491805937f3d1dc4d63e6a2dab64ff0f1cf1794bc953</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4488755$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1049096504003555/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901,58212,58445,72930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stone, Walter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Datta, Monti Narayan</creatorcontrib><title>Rationalizing the California Recall</title><title>PS, political science & politics</title><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Popular interpretations of the 2003 CA gubernatorial recall election as a typical gubernatorial election or as the Republican Party's manipulation of political processes are challenged. An overview of the recall election is presented, demonstrating its resemblance to initiatives, referenda, & primary elections. Analysis of the results of the 2002 general election & the 2003 recall election is conducted, indicating the effects of several indicators -- racial identity, employment status, support for Davis in the 2002 election, party affiliation, & support for Ross Perot in the 1992 US presidential election -- upon voters' preferences. Several findings are revealed: Latino American & African American voters withdrew their traditionally high level of support for Democrats; unemployment status had a greater effect upon support for Davis in the 2002 election; & support for Perot & support for Davis's recall were positively correlated. It is concluded that the CA recall election bears a strong resemblance to a referendum. 1 Table, 1 Figure, 1 Reference. J. W. Parker]]></description><subject>Ballots</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>Political elections</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Public Support</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Recall elections</subject><subject>Referendum</subject><subject>Referendums</subject><subject>Symposium</subject><subject>Symposium: Recalling the Recall: Reflections on California's Recent Political Adventure</subject><subject>Voter registration</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><issn>1049-0965</issn><issn>1537-5935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QHBRENyN3pjXZCnFtkpBrI9tyGSSmjqdqckU1F9v6pRuBO8mN3znXA4HoVMMlxiwuHrCQCVIzoACEMbYHuphRkTGJGH7aU842_BDdBTjAtLkDHrofKZb39S68t--ng_aNzsYpo9rQu31YGaNrqpjdOB0Fe3J9u2jl9Ht83CSTR_Gd8ObaWYIyDbDlpKCalYwkQtwzADNCZU4h5RBOFLi0tCSE8v1dakLTp0Dh43DQtLCSEb66KK7uwrNx9rGVi19NLaqdG2bdVQcuMyJlEmIO6EJTYzBOrUKfqnDl8KgNnWoP3Ukz1nnWcS2CTsDpXkufnHWYR9b-7nDOrwrLohgio8f1eT-lcrZFCue9GQbQS-L4Mu5VYtmHVKR8Z8QP-ZVeCM</recordid><startdate>200401</startdate><enddate>200401</enddate><creator>Stone, Walter J.</creator><creator>Datta, Monti Narayan</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>American Political Science Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200401</creationdate><title>Rationalizing the California Recall</title><author>Stone, Walter J. ; Datta, Monti Narayan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1e43b4a5b57870f5c0483491805937f3d1dc4d63e6a2dab64ff0f1cf1794bc953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Ballots</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>Political elections</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Public Support</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Recall elections</topic><topic>Referendum</topic><topic>Referendums</topic><topic>Symposium</topic><topic>Symposium: Recalling the Recall: Reflections on California's Recent Political Adventure</topic><topic>Voter registration</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stone, Walter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Datta, Monti Narayan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stone, Walter J.</au><au>Datta, Monti Narayan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rationalizing the California Recall</atitle><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><date>2004-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>19-21</pages><issn>1049-0965</issn><eissn>1537-5935</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Popular interpretations of the 2003 CA gubernatorial recall election as a typical gubernatorial election or as the Republican Party's manipulation of political processes are challenged. An overview of the recall election is presented, demonstrating its resemblance to initiatives, referenda, & primary elections. Analysis of the results of the 2002 general election & the 2003 recall election is conducted, indicating the effects of several indicators -- racial identity, employment status, support for Davis in the 2002 election, party affiliation, & support for Ross Perot in the 1992 US presidential election -- upon voters' preferences. Several findings are revealed: Latino American & African American voters withdrew their traditionally high level of support for Democrats; unemployment status had a greater effect upon support for Davis in the 2002 election; & support for Perot & support for Davis's recall were positively correlated. It is concluded that the CA recall election bears a strong resemblance to a referendum. 1 Table, 1 Figure, 1 Reference. J. W. Parker]]></abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1049096504003555</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-0965 |
ispartof | PS, political science & politics, 2004-01, Vol.37 (1), p.19-21 |
issn | 1049-0965 1537-5935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60698399 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press; JSTOR |
subjects | Ballots California Candidates Elections Governors Political campaigns Political candidates Political elections Political partisanship Public Support Recall Recall elections Referendum Referendums Symposium Symposium: Recalling the Recall: Reflections on California's Recent Political Adventure Voter registration Voting Voting Behavior |
title | Rationalizing the California Recall |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T12%3A22%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rationalizing%20the%20California%20Recall&rft.jtitle=PS,%20political%20science%20&%20politics&rft.au=Stone,%20Walter%20J.&rft.date=2004-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=19-21&rft.issn=1049-0965&rft.eissn=1537-5935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049096504003555&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4488755%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1e43b4a5b57870f5c0483491805937f3d1dc4d63e6a2dab64ff0f1cf1794bc953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60698399&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1049096504003555&rft_jstor_id=4488755&rfr_iscdi=true |