Tradition/Modernity: An Ideal Type Gone Astray

In a recent essay in this journal Dean C. Tipps subjected the tradition/ modernity concept to a thorough ideological and empirical critique and concluded that the time has come to get rid of it. Although his ideological and empirical analyses were convincing, the methodological remarks at the end of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Comparative studies in society and history 1975-04, Vol.17 (2), p.245-252
Main Author: Shiner, L. E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ambiguity
Comparative politics
Constructive empiricism
Debate on Modernization
Experimental data
Heuristics
Ideal type
Ideal/Ideals/Idealism/ Idealistic/ Idealize/ Idealization
Modern/Modernity/Modernism/ Modernist/ Modernists/ Modernizing
Phenomena
Secularization
Social theories
Terminology
Tradition/Traditions/ Traditional/ Traditionalistic/ Traditionalism
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In a recent essay in this journal Dean C. Tipps subjected the tradition/ modernity concept to a thorough ideological and empirical critique and concluded that the time has come to get rid of it. Although his ideological and empirical analyses were convincing, the methodological remarks at the end of the essay were incomplete. If the contention that we should no longer attempt to revise the tradition/modernity concept is to stick, compelling methodological grounds must be given since ideological bias and empirical inadequacy can in principle be corrected. I want to show that in so far as the tradition/modernity concept is an ideal type, efforts to make it better ‘fit’ the spread of empirical data are in principle wrong. Moreover, efforts to transform the concept into an empirical ranking device or a classificatory system are open to equally serious objections. In order to do this I will first clarify the nature and function of ideal types, empirical types and classification systems.
ISSN:0010-4175
1475-2999
1471-633X
DOI:10.1017/S0010417500007799