On the Evaluation of Sociological Theory

A failure to distinguish interpretive from explanatory sociological theory has created two opposing camps within the field: those who view the classical but unscientific writings of Weber, Durkheim, etc, as historically interesting & perhaps as sources of raw material for further scientific expl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy of the social sciences 1977-03, Vol.7 (1), p.33-50
Main Author: Green, Bryan S.R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Evaluation/Evaluations/Evaluative
Social theory/Social theories
Sociological
Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-b8981e6a8893b9594e38d6d175abc8ddd7de336ef766c3321088d5d7043902ca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-b8981e6a8893b9594e38d6d175abc8ddd7de336ef766c3321088d5d7043902ca3
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 33
container_title Philosophy of the social sciences
container_volume 7
creator Green, Bryan S.R.
description A failure to distinguish interpretive from explanatory sociological theory has created two opposing camps within the field: those who view the classical but unscientific writings of Weber, Durkheim, etc, as historically interesting & perhaps as sources of raw material for further scientific explanation, & those who assume the validity of the earlier works but cannot defend them in the acceptable (ie, scientific) manner. Interpretive theory should be seen as a distinct form of sociology which evolved in an environment of criteria--usually latent & unformulated--embedded in the concerns & interests of the intellectual community of the time. Criteria for judging explanatory theory have been precisely articulated & thus gained authority; the criteria governing the production of interpretive theory should be raised to a similar level in order to achieve orthodoxy. Modified Author's Summary.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/004839317700700102
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60867653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_004839317700700102</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1300113252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-b8981e6a8893b9594e38d6d175abc8ddd7de336ef766c3321088d5d7043902ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOCIF7WJpnNnz1KaVUo9GA9hzTJtlu2m5rsCv32pqwHUYSBmcPvPeY9hG4JfiREiAnGhYQS0olxGoLpGRoRxmguioKco9EJyE_EJbqKcZcQyhkfoYdlm3Vbl80-ddPrrvZt5qvszZvaN35TG91kq63z4XiNLirdRHfzvcfofT5bTV_yxfL5dfq0yA0UvMvXspTEcS1lCeuSlYUDabklgum1kdZaYR0Ad5Xg3ABQgqW0zApcQImp0TBG94PvIfiP3sVO7etoXNPo1vk-Ko4lF5xBAu9-gTvfhzb9pgikfAQoo4miA2WCjzG4Sh1CvdfhqAhWp-rU3-qSaDKIot64H7b_K74AjPhrJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300113252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Evaluation of Sociological Theory</title><source>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012</source><creator>Green, Bryan S.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Green, Bryan S.R.</creatorcontrib><description>A failure to distinguish interpretive from explanatory sociological theory has created two opposing camps within the field: those who view the classical but unscientific writings of Weber, Durkheim, etc, as historically interesting &amp; perhaps as sources of raw material for further scientific explanation, &amp; those who assume the validity of the earlier works but cannot defend them in the acceptable (ie, scientific) manner. Interpretive theory should be seen as a distinct form of sociology which evolved in an environment of criteria--usually latent &amp; unformulated--embedded in the concerns &amp; interests of the intellectual community of the time. Criteria for judging explanatory theory have been precisely articulated &amp; thus gained authority; the criteria governing the production of interpretive theory should be raised to a similar level in order to achieve orthodoxy. Modified Author's Summary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-3931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/004839317700700102</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHSSCM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Evaluation/Evaluations/Evaluative ; Social theory/Social theories ; Sociological ; Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing</subject><ispartof>Philosophy of the social sciences, 1977-03, Vol.7 (1), p.33-50</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-b8981e6a8893b9594e38d6d175abc8ddd7de336ef766c3321088d5d7043902ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-b8981e6a8893b9594e38d6d175abc8ddd7de336ef766c3321088d5d7043902ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1300113252/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1300113252?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,13385,21825,27903,27904,33754,38593,38594,44733,45061,45449,75044</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Green, Bryan S.R.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Evaluation of Sociological Theory</title><title>Philosophy of the social sciences</title><description>A failure to distinguish interpretive from explanatory sociological theory has created two opposing camps within the field: those who view the classical but unscientific writings of Weber, Durkheim, etc, as historically interesting &amp; perhaps as sources of raw material for further scientific explanation, &amp; those who assume the validity of the earlier works but cannot defend them in the acceptable (ie, scientific) manner. Interpretive theory should be seen as a distinct form of sociology which evolved in an environment of criteria--usually latent &amp; unformulated--embedded in the concerns &amp; interests of the intellectual community of the time. Criteria for judging explanatory theory have been precisely articulated &amp; thus gained authority; the criteria governing the production of interpretive theory should be raised to a similar level in order to achieve orthodoxy. Modified Author's Summary.</description><subject>Evaluation/Evaluations/Evaluative</subject><subject>Social theory/Social theories</subject><subject>Sociological</subject><subject>Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing</subject><issn>0048-3931</issn><issn>1552-7441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOCIF7WJpnNnz1KaVUo9GA9hzTJtlu2m5rsCv32pqwHUYSBmcPvPeY9hG4JfiREiAnGhYQS0olxGoLpGRoRxmguioKco9EJyE_EJbqKcZcQyhkfoYdlm3Vbl80-ddPrrvZt5qvszZvaN35TG91kq63z4XiNLirdRHfzvcfofT5bTV_yxfL5dfq0yA0UvMvXspTEcS1lCeuSlYUDabklgum1kdZaYR0Ad5Xg3ABQgqW0zApcQImp0TBG94PvIfiP3sVO7etoXNPo1vk-Ko4lF5xBAu9-gTvfhzb9pgikfAQoo4miA2WCjzG4Sh1CvdfhqAhWp-rU3-qSaDKIot64H7b_K74AjPhrJw</recordid><startdate>197703</startdate><enddate>197703</enddate><creator>Green, Bryan S.R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Periodicals Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OT</scope><scope>~OU</scope><scope>~OV</scope><scope>~OW</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>~PS</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197703</creationdate><title>On the Evaluation of Sociological Theory</title><author>Green, Bryan S.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-b8981e6a8893b9594e38d6d175abc8ddd7de336ef766c3321088d5d7043902ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Evaluation/Evaluations/Evaluative</topic><topic>Social theory/Social theories</topic><topic>Sociological</topic><topic>Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Green, Bryan S.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2 (purchase pre Oct/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Philosophy &amp; Religion Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Philosophy of the social sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Green, Bryan S.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Evaluation of Sociological Theory</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy of the social sciences</jtitle><date>1977-03</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>33-50</pages><issn>0048-3931</issn><eissn>1552-7441</eissn><coden>PHSSCM</coden><abstract>A failure to distinguish interpretive from explanatory sociological theory has created two opposing camps within the field: those who view the classical but unscientific writings of Weber, Durkheim, etc, as historically interesting &amp; perhaps as sources of raw material for further scientific explanation, &amp; those who assume the validity of the earlier works but cannot defend them in the acceptable (ie, scientific) manner. Interpretive theory should be seen as a distinct form of sociology which evolved in an environment of criteria--usually latent &amp; unformulated--embedded in the concerns &amp; interests of the intellectual community of the time. Criteria for judging explanatory theory have been precisely articulated &amp; thus gained authority; the criteria governing the production of interpretive theory should be raised to a similar level in order to achieve orthodoxy. Modified Author's Summary.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/004839317700700102</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-3931
ispartof Philosophy of the social sciences, 1977-03, Vol.7 (1), p.33-50
issn 0048-3931
1552-7441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60867653
source Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete Deep Backfile Purchase 2012
subjects Evaluation/Evaluations/Evaluative
Social theory/Social theories
Sociological
Theory/Theories/Theorem/ Theorizing
title On the Evaluation of Sociological Theory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T11%3A26%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Evaluation%20of%20Sociological%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20of%20the%20social%20sciences&rft.au=Green,%20Bryan%20S.R.&rft.date=1977-03&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=33-50&rft.issn=0048-3931&rft.eissn=1552-7441&rft.coden=PHSSCM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/004839317700700102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1300113252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-b8981e6a8893b9594e38d6d175abc8ddd7de336ef766c3321088d5d7043902ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300113252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_004839317700700102&rfr_iscdi=true