Loading…
Is it time to junk our nukes?
The US needs to rely on more useful weapons. Nuclear weapons have no credibility, and so have no deterrence capability. More conventional and "smart" weapons would better serve the country.
Saved in:
| Published in: | The Washington quarterly 1997-09, Vol.20 (3), p.97-101 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4ff4cc1da4a2441d5d9ee9b69f018b4cf15b5286a81b387ca6f218a0aed221603 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 101 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 97 |
| container_title | The Washington quarterly |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Nitze, Paul H. |
| description | The US needs to rely on more useful weapons. Nuclear weapons have no credibility, and so have no deterrence capability. More conventional and "smart" weapons would better serve the country. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01636609709550259 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60893962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60893962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4ff4cc1da4a2441d5d9ee9b69f018b4cf15b5286a81b387ca6f218a0aed221603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gAchKOgpOpPsJwgixY9CwYuCt2Wb7ELaNKm7Cdp_75Z6slRPc5jnmZd3CDlFuEaQcAPIc85BCVCMQcbUHhkgyyFVKMQ-Gaz3aQTeD8lRCDMAUFTSATkbh6Tqkq5a2KRrk1nfzJO290nTz224OyYHztTBnvzMIXl7fHgdPaeTl6fx6H6SFpTTLqXO0aLA0lCTUYolK5W1asqVA5RTWjhkU5ZJbiROcykKw12G0oCxZZYhh3xIrjZ3l7796G3o9KIKha1r09i2D1rmCpigUkby8k-Sg1S54lkEz3-Bs9iriS10hgxyVJRG6GIXhFKImMnE-hRuqMK3IXjr9NJXC-NXGkGvv6-3vh8dsXGqxrV-YT5bX5e6M6u69c6bpqjCtqW7ry6at_-a-e7gb6I-mHU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877057572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is it time to junk our nukes?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Nitze, Paul H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nitze, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><description>The US needs to rely on more useful weapons. Nuclear weapons have no credibility, and so have no deterrence capability. More conventional and "smart" weapons would better serve the country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-660X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9177</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01636609709550259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Arms limitation ; Defence policy ; Defense ; DEFENSE POLICY AND SPENDING ; International relations-US ; Military weapons ; Nuclear strategy ; NUCLEAR WEAPONS ; Post-Cold War ; PUBLIC POLICY ; SECURITY ; U.S.A ; UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT</subject><ispartof>The Washington quarterly, 1997-09, Vol.20 (3), p.97-101</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1997</rights><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Summer 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4ff4cc1da4a2441d5d9ee9b69f018b4cf15b5286a81b387ca6f218a0aed221603</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nitze, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><title>Is it time to junk our nukes?</title><title>The Washington quarterly</title><description>The US needs to rely on more useful weapons. Nuclear weapons have no credibility, and so have no deterrence capability. More conventional and "smart" weapons would better serve the country.</description><subject>Arms limitation</subject><subject>Defence policy</subject><subject>Defense</subject><subject>DEFENSE POLICY AND SPENDING</subject><subject>International relations-US</subject><subject>Military weapons</subject><subject>Nuclear strategy</subject><subject>NUCLEAR WEAPONS</subject><subject>Post-Cold War</subject><subject>PUBLIC POLICY</subject><subject>SECURITY</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT</subject><issn>0163-660X</issn><issn>1530-9177</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gAchKOgpOpPsJwgixY9CwYuCt2Wb7ELaNKm7Cdp_75Z6slRPc5jnmZd3CDlFuEaQcAPIc85BCVCMQcbUHhkgyyFVKMQ-Gaz3aQTeD8lRCDMAUFTSATkbh6Tqkq5a2KRrk1nfzJO290nTz224OyYHztTBnvzMIXl7fHgdPaeTl6fx6H6SFpTTLqXO0aLA0lCTUYolK5W1asqVA5RTWjhkU5ZJbiROcykKw12G0oCxZZYhh3xIrjZ3l7796G3o9KIKha1r09i2D1rmCpigUkby8k-Sg1S54lkEz3-Bs9iriS10hgxyVJRG6GIXhFKImMnE-hRuqMK3IXjr9NJXC-NXGkGvv6-3vh8dsXGqxrV-YT5bX5e6M6u69c6bpqjCtqW7ry6at_-a-e7gb6I-mHU</recordid><startdate>19970901</startdate><enddate>19970901</enddate><creator>Nitze, Paul H.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970901</creationdate><title>Is it time to junk our nukes?</title><author>Nitze, Paul H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4ff4cc1da4a2441d5d9ee9b69f018b4cf15b5286a81b387ca6f218a0aed221603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Arms limitation</topic><topic>Defence policy</topic><topic>Defense</topic><topic>DEFENSE POLICY AND SPENDING</topic><topic>International relations-US</topic><topic>Military weapons</topic><topic>Nuclear strategy</topic><topic>NUCLEAR WEAPONS</topic><topic>Post-Cold War</topic><topic>PUBLIC POLICY</topic><topic>SECURITY</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nitze, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Washington quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nitze, Paul H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is it time to junk our nukes?</atitle><jtitle>The Washington quarterly</jtitle><date>1997-09-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>97-101</pages><issn>0163-660X</issn><eissn>1530-9177</eissn><abstract>The US needs to rely on more useful weapons. Nuclear weapons have no credibility, and so have no deterrence capability. More conventional and "smart" weapons would better serve the country.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/01636609709550259</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0163-660X |
| ispartof | The Washington quarterly, 1997-09, Vol.20 (3), p.97-101 |
| issn | 0163-660X 1530-9177 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60893962 |
| source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list) |
| subjects | Arms limitation Defence policy Defense DEFENSE POLICY AND SPENDING International relations-US Military weapons Nuclear strategy NUCLEAR WEAPONS Post-Cold War PUBLIC POLICY SECURITY U.S.A UNITED STATES, 1945 TO PRESENT |
| title | Is it time to junk our nukes? |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A00%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20it%20time%20to%20junk%20our%20nukes?&rft.jtitle=The%20Washington%20quarterly&rft.au=Nitze,%20Paul%20H.&rft.date=1997-09-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=97-101&rft.issn=0163-660X&rft.eissn=1530-9177&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01636609709550259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E60893962%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4ff4cc1da4a2441d5d9ee9b69f018b4cf15b5286a81b387ca6f218a0aed221603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877057572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |