STRUCTURAL DISCONTINUITY — A CRITICAL FACTOR IN THE EMERGENCE OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STATES [1]

Exploring the formation of states, the question is posed of why some societies remain in a prestate condition, while others go on to become states. Inherent contradictions of prestate societies based on kinship grounds limit their statehood options. The higher the level of DofL & the more comple...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dialectical anthropology 1986-04, Vol.10 (3/4), p.155-177
Main Author: Zagarell, Allen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aristocracy
Chiefdoms
Cities
Clans
Communities
Kinship
Polynesian studies
Population growth
Social evolution
Social Structure
State Formation
Sumer
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-27bbf732474856f783d05fb72da206a4fca96a9872263914fc00414cd4354ea73
cites
container_end_page 177
container_issue 3/4
container_start_page 155
container_title Dialectical anthropology
container_volume 10
creator Zagarell, Allen
description Exploring the formation of states, the question is posed of why some societies remain in a prestate condition, while others go on to become states. Inherent contradictions of prestate societies based on kinship grounds limit their statehood options. The higher the level of DofL & the more complex & mutually dependent the labor processes, the greater the likelihood that a state will be formed. Military threats from outside often provide the impetus for a society to act cohesively. State dominance is the result of a convergence of forces. S. McAneny
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02343103
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60952852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>29790154</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>29790154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-27bbf732474856f783d05fb72da206a4fca96a9872263914fc00414cd4354ea73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1Kw0AURgdRsFY37oUBQUSI3vlJJrOMadIG2kSSyaKIhDRNoKVtaqZduPMhfEKfxISKggtXl497OHDvh9AlgXsCIB4efaCMMwLsCPWIKZgBwraOUQ8YcIODpKfoTOslABDCrR4qEhWnrkpjZ4wHQeJGoQrCNFBT_Pn-gR3sxoEK3HbpO66KYhyEWI087E28eOiFrocjHz_FwcSJp9gJBzjxWsWgS4lylJfgZ_Jyjk6qfKXLi-_ZR6nvKXdkjKNh5zYKasHOoGI2qwSjXHDbtCphszmY1UzQeU7BynlV5NLKpS0otZgkbQbghBdzzkxe5oL10c3Bu23q132pd9l6oYtytco3Zb3XmQXSpLZJW_D2X7D9DAOQknXO6z_ost43m_aMjFBJJGMcSEvdHaiiqbVuyirbNot13rxlBLKumOy3mBa-OsBLvaubH5JKIYGYnH0Bi9Z-5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291933401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>STRUCTURAL DISCONTINUITY — A CRITICAL FACTOR IN THE EMERGENCE OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STATES [1]</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer LINK Archives</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Zagarell, Allen</creator><creatorcontrib>Zagarell, Allen</creatorcontrib><description>Exploring the formation of states, the question is posed of why some societies remain in a prestate condition, while others go on to become states. Inherent contradictions of prestate societies based on kinship grounds limit their statehood options. The higher the level of DofL &amp; the more complex &amp; mutually dependent the labor processes, the greater the likelihood that a state will be formed. Military threats from outside often provide the impetus for a society to act cohesively. State dominance is the result of a convergence of forces. S. McAneny</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02343103</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DIANDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Aristocracy ; Chiefdoms ; Cities ; Clans ; Communities ; Kinship ; Polynesian studies ; Population growth ; Social evolution ; Social Structure ; State Formation ; Sumer</subject><ispartof>Dialectical anthropology, 1986-04, Vol.10 (3/4), p.155-177</ispartof><rights>1986 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-27bbf732474856f783d05fb72da206a4fca96a9872263914fc00414cd4354ea73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/29790154$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/29790154$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33775,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zagarell, Allen</creatorcontrib><title>STRUCTURAL DISCONTINUITY — A CRITICAL FACTOR IN THE EMERGENCE OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STATES [1]</title><title>Dialectical anthropology</title><description>Exploring the formation of states, the question is posed of why some societies remain in a prestate condition, while others go on to become states. Inherent contradictions of prestate societies based on kinship grounds limit their statehood options. The higher the level of DofL &amp; the more complex &amp; mutually dependent the labor processes, the greater the likelihood that a state will be formed. Military threats from outside often provide the impetus for a society to act cohesively. State dominance is the result of a convergence of forces. S. McAneny</description><subject>Aristocracy</subject><subject>Chiefdoms</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Clans</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Polynesian studies</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Social evolution</subject><subject>Social Structure</subject><subject>State Formation</subject><subject>Sumer</subject><issn>0304-4092</issn><issn>1573-0786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1Kw0AURgdRsFY37oUBQUSI3vlJJrOMadIG2kSSyaKIhDRNoKVtaqZduPMhfEKfxISKggtXl497OHDvh9AlgXsCIB4efaCMMwLsCPWIKZgBwraOUQ8YcIODpKfoTOslABDCrR4qEhWnrkpjZ4wHQeJGoQrCNFBT_Pn-gR3sxoEK3HbpO66KYhyEWI087E28eOiFrocjHz_FwcSJp9gJBzjxWsWgS4lylJfgZ_Jyjk6qfKXLi-_ZR6nvKXdkjKNh5zYKasHOoGI2qwSjXHDbtCphszmY1UzQeU7BynlV5NLKpS0otZgkbQbghBdzzkxe5oL10c3Bu23q132pd9l6oYtytco3Zb3XmQXSpLZJW_D2X7D9DAOQknXO6z_ost43m_aMjFBJJGMcSEvdHaiiqbVuyirbNot13rxlBLKumOy3mBa-OsBLvaubH5JKIYGYnH0Bi9Z-5g</recordid><startdate>19860401</startdate><enddate>19860401</enddate><creator>Zagarell, Allen</creator><general>Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company</general><general>Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860401</creationdate><title>STRUCTURAL DISCONTINUITY — A CRITICAL FACTOR IN THE EMERGENCE OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STATES [1]</title><author>Zagarell, Allen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-27bbf732474856f783d05fb72da206a4fca96a9872263914fc00414cd4354ea73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Aristocracy</topic><topic>Chiefdoms</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Clans</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Polynesian studies</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Social evolution</topic><topic>Social Structure</topic><topic>State Formation</topic><topic>Sumer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zagarell, Allen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Dialectical anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zagarell, Allen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>STRUCTURAL DISCONTINUITY — A CRITICAL FACTOR IN THE EMERGENCE OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STATES [1]</atitle><jtitle>Dialectical anthropology</jtitle><date>1986-04-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3/4</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>155-177</pages><issn>0304-4092</issn><eissn>1573-0786</eissn><coden>DIANDV</coden><abstract>Exploring the formation of states, the question is posed of why some societies remain in a prestate condition, while others go on to become states. Inherent contradictions of prestate societies based on kinship grounds limit their statehood options. The higher the level of DofL &amp; the more complex &amp; mutually dependent the labor processes, the greater the likelihood that a state will be formed. Military threats from outside often provide the impetus for a society to act cohesively. State dominance is the result of a convergence of forces. S. McAneny</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02343103</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-4092
ispartof Dialectical anthropology, 1986-04, Vol.10 (3/4), p.155-177
issn 0304-4092
1573-0786
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60952852
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer LINK Archives; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Aristocracy
Chiefdoms
Cities
Clans
Communities
Kinship
Polynesian studies
Population growth
Social evolution
Social Structure
State Formation
Sumer
title STRUCTURAL DISCONTINUITY — A CRITICAL FACTOR IN THE EMERGENCE OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STATES [1]
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A01%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=STRUCTURAL%20DISCONTINUITY%20%E2%80%94%20A%20CRITICAL%20FACTOR%20IN%20THE%20EMERGENCE%20OF%20PRIMARY%20AND%20SECONDARY%20STATES%20%5B1%5D&rft.jtitle=Dialectical%20anthropology&rft.au=Zagarell,%20Allen&rft.date=1986-04-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3/4&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=155-177&rft.issn=0304-4092&rft.eissn=1573-0786&rft.coden=DIANDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02343103&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E29790154%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-27bbf732474856f783d05fb72da206a4fca96a9872263914fc00414cd4354ea73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291933401&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=29790154&rfr_iscdi=true