Loading…

contagion of stress across multiple roles

Previous research on multiple role stress has hypothesized the existence of two types of stress contagion: spillover, in which the stresses experienced in either the work or home domain lead to stresses in the other domain; and crossover, in which the stresses experienced by one's spouse at wor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of marriage and family 1989-02, Vol.51 (1), p.175-183
Main Authors: Bolger, N, DeLongis, A, Kessler, R.C, Wethington, E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be7f33031a8995366b1621404f2da0b06df0eba4fee8818b6979b7c6830666e93
cites
container_end_page 183
container_issue 1
container_start_page 175
container_title Journal of marriage and family
container_volume 51
creator Bolger, N
DeLongis, A
Kessler, R.C
Wethington, E
description Previous research on multiple role stress has hypothesized the existence of two types of stress contagion: spillover, in which the stresses experienced in either the work or home domain lead to stresses in the other domain; and crossover, in which the stresses experienced by one's spouse at work lead to stresses for oneself at home. However, empirical evidence of these processes has been largely indirect and qualitative. This study provides the first direct quantitative evidence on the causal dynamics of stress contagion across work and home domains in married couples. Contrary to previous thinking, results indicate that husbands are more likely than their wives to bring their home stresses into the workplace. Also, stress contagion from work to home was evident for both husbands and wives. Furthermore, the contagion of work stress into the home sets in motion a process of dyadic adjustment, whereby individuals, particularly wives, appear to modify their housework efforts to compensate for the work stresses of their spouses. Such findings provide important insights into the dynamics of gender differences in role stress and confirm the value of studying chronic stress processes at the level of analysis where such stresses are inevitably manifest—in day-to-day events and activities.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/352378
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61018948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>352378</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>352378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be7f33031a8995366b1621404f2da0b06df0eba4fee8818b6979b7c6830666e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv-BRdFwcPqJJPNx7EUv6DgQXsO2W1Stmw3Ndk9-O9dbaEgdC5zeXjemZeQSwoPDEE-YsFQqiMyopLTHCXKYzICYCxnnBen5CylFQzDNIzIfRXazi7r0GbBZ6mLLqXMVjEMa903Xb1pXBZD49I5OfG2Se5it8dk_vz0OX3NZ-8vb9PJLK9QyS4vnfSIgNQqrQsUoqSCUQ7cs4WFEsTCgyst984pRVUptNSlrIRCEEI4jWNyt_VuYvjqXerMuk6VaxrbutAnIyhQpbkawOt_4Cr0sR1uM4xqWQDnMEA3hyDKtCgUUCn3mX-PR-fNJtZrG78NBfNbqtmWOoC3O51NlW18tG1Vpz1NFWoh2D52lboQD9uutpS3wdhlHEzzDwYUgQmNDAv8ASRUhjc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219750440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>contagion of stress across multiple roles</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Bolger, N ; DeLongis, A ; Kessler, R.C ; Wethington, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Bolger, N ; DeLongis, A ; Kessler, R.C ; Wethington, E</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research on multiple role stress has hypothesized the existence of two types of stress contagion: spillover, in which the stresses experienced in either the work or home domain lead to stresses in the other domain; and crossover, in which the stresses experienced by one's spouse at work lead to stresses for oneself at home. However, empirical evidence of these processes has been largely indirect and qualitative. This study provides the first direct quantitative evidence on the causal dynamics of stress contagion across work and home domains in married couples. Contrary to previous thinking, results indicate that husbands are more likely than their wives to bring their home stresses into the workplace. Also, stress contagion from work to home was evident for both husbands and wives. Furthermore, the contagion of work stress into the home sets in motion a process of dyadic adjustment, whereby individuals, particularly wives, appear to modify their housework efforts to compensate for the work stresses of their spouses. Such findings provide important insights into the dynamics of gender differences in role stress and confirm the value of studying chronic stress processes at the level of analysis where such stresses are inevitably manifest—in day-to-day events and activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/352378</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMFAA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: National Council on Family Relations</publisher><subject>Couples ; Crossovers ; Families &amp; family life ; family relations ; Family Work Relationship ; Gender roles ; Home based employment ; home stress ; Housekeeping ; Husbands ; Job stress ; Marital Relations ; marital relationships ; Marriage ; Men ; Of General Interest ; Psychological Stress ; Role Conflict ; roles ; Sexuality. Marriage. Family relations ; Social research ; Sociology ; Sociology of the family. Age groups ; Spouses ; Stress ; stress crossover ; stress spillover ; Wives ; work stress ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of marriage and family, 1989-02, Vol.51 (1), p.175-183</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1989 National Council on Family Relations</rights><rights>Copyright National Council on Family Relations Feb 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be7f33031a8995366b1621404f2da0b06df0eba4fee8818b6979b7c6830666e93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/219750440/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/219750440?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,21378,21394,21395,27344,27924,27925,33223,33611,33612,33774,33775,33877,33878,34530,34531,43733,43880,44115,58238,58471,74093,74269,74511</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=11839662$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bolger, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLongis, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, R.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wethington, E</creatorcontrib><title>contagion of stress across multiple roles</title><title>Journal of marriage and family</title><description>Previous research on multiple role stress has hypothesized the existence of two types of stress contagion: spillover, in which the stresses experienced in either the work or home domain lead to stresses in the other domain; and crossover, in which the stresses experienced by one's spouse at work lead to stresses for oneself at home. However, empirical evidence of these processes has been largely indirect and qualitative. This study provides the first direct quantitative evidence on the causal dynamics of stress contagion across work and home domains in married couples. Contrary to previous thinking, results indicate that husbands are more likely than their wives to bring their home stresses into the workplace. Also, stress contagion from work to home was evident for both husbands and wives. Furthermore, the contagion of work stress into the home sets in motion a process of dyadic adjustment, whereby individuals, particularly wives, appear to modify their housework efforts to compensate for the work stresses of their spouses. Such findings provide important insights into the dynamics of gender differences in role stress and confirm the value of studying chronic stress processes at the level of analysis where such stresses are inevitably manifest—in day-to-day events and activities.</description><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Crossovers</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>family relations</subject><subject>Family Work Relationship</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Home based employment</subject><subject>home stress</subject><subject>Housekeeping</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Job stress</subject><subject>Marital Relations</subject><subject>marital relationships</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Of General Interest</subject><subject>Psychological Stress</subject><subject>Role Conflict</subject><subject>roles</subject><subject>Sexuality. Marriage. Family relations</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of the family. Age groups</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>stress crossover</subject><subject>stress spillover</subject><subject>Wives</subject><subject>work stress</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0022-2445</issn><issn>1741-3737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv-BRdFwcPqJJPNx7EUv6DgQXsO2W1Stmw3Ndk9-O9dbaEgdC5zeXjemZeQSwoPDEE-YsFQqiMyopLTHCXKYzICYCxnnBen5CylFQzDNIzIfRXazi7r0GbBZ6mLLqXMVjEMa903Xb1pXBZD49I5OfG2Se5it8dk_vz0OX3NZ-8vb9PJLK9QyS4vnfSIgNQqrQsUoqSCUQ7cs4WFEsTCgyst984pRVUptNSlrIRCEEI4jWNyt_VuYvjqXerMuk6VaxrbutAnIyhQpbkawOt_4Cr0sR1uM4xqWQDnMEA3hyDKtCgUUCn3mX-PR-fNJtZrG78NBfNbqtmWOoC3O51NlW18tG1Vpz1NFWoh2D52lboQD9uutpS3wdhlHEzzDwYUgQmNDAv8ASRUhjc</recordid><startdate>19890201</startdate><enddate>19890201</enddate><creator>Bolger, N</creator><creator>DeLongis, A</creator><creator>Kessler, R.C</creator><creator>Wethington, E</creator><general>National Council on Family Relations</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890201</creationdate><title>contagion of stress across multiple roles</title><author>Bolger, N ; DeLongis, A ; Kessler, R.C ; Wethington, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be7f33031a8995366b1621404f2da0b06df0eba4fee8818b6979b7c6830666e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Crossovers</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>family relations</topic><topic>Family Work Relationship</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Home based employment</topic><topic>home stress</topic><topic>Housekeeping</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Job stress</topic><topic>Marital Relations</topic><topic>marital relationships</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Of General Interest</topic><topic>Psychological Stress</topic><topic>Role Conflict</topic><topic>roles</topic><topic>Sexuality. Marriage. Family relations</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of the family. Age groups</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>stress crossover</topic><topic>stress spillover</topic><topic>Wives</topic><topic>work stress</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bolger, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLongis, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, R.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wethington, E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bolger, N</au><au>DeLongis, A</au><au>Kessler, R.C</au><au>Wethington, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>contagion of stress across multiple roles</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle><date>1989-02-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>175-183</pages><issn>0022-2445</issn><eissn>1741-3737</eissn><coden>JMFAA6</coden><abstract>Previous research on multiple role stress has hypothesized the existence of two types of stress contagion: spillover, in which the stresses experienced in either the work or home domain lead to stresses in the other domain; and crossover, in which the stresses experienced by one's spouse at work lead to stresses for oneself at home. However, empirical evidence of these processes has been largely indirect and qualitative. This study provides the first direct quantitative evidence on the causal dynamics of stress contagion across work and home domains in married couples. Contrary to previous thinking, results indicate that husbands are more likely than their wives to bring their home stresses into the workplace. Also, stress contagion from work to home was evident for both husbands and wives. Furthermore, the contagion of work stress into the home sets in motion a process of dyadic adjustment, whereby individuals, particularly wives, appear to modify their housework efforts to compensate for the work stresses of their spouses. Such findings provide important insights into the dynamics of gender differences in role stress and confirm the value of studying chronic stress processes at the level of analysis where such stresses are inevitably manifest—in day-to-day events and activities.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>National Council on Family Relations</pub><doi>10.2307/352378</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2445
ispartof Journal of marriage and family, 1989-02, Vol.51 (1), p.175-183
issn 0022-2445
1741-3737
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61018948
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Couples
Crossovers
Families & family life
family relations
Family Work Relationship
Gender roles
Home based employment
home stress
Housekeeping
Husbands
Job stress
Marital Relations
marital relationships
Marriage
Men
Of General Interest
Psychological Stress
Role Conflict
roles
Sexuality. Marriage. Family relations
Social research
Sociology
Sociology of the family. Age groups
Spouses
Stress
stress crossover
stress spillover
Wives
work stress
Workplaces
title contagion of stress across multiple roles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A34%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=contagion%20of%20stress%20across%20multiple%20roles&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marriage%20and%20family&rft.au=Bolger,%20N&rft.date=1989-02-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=175-183&rft.issn=0022-2445&rft.eissn=1741-3737&rft.coden=JMFAA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/352378&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E352378%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-be7f33031a8995366b1621404f2da0b06df0eba4fee8818b6979b7c6830666e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219750440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=352378&rfr_iscdi=true