Loading…
Res Publica, Res Privata
This article examines the problem of the public and the private in terms of culture and social organization. Two strategies for building societal structures are distinguished: the bottom-up and the top-down. More specifically, the liberal and the Marxist-Leninist solutions are discussed. It is claim...
Saved in:
Published in: | International political science review 1991-10, Vol.12 (4), p.337-351 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This article examines the problem of the public and the private in terms of culture and social organization. Two strategies for building societal structures are distinguished: the bottom-up and the top-down. More specifically, the liberal and the Marxist-Leninist solutions are discussed. It is claimed that only in the first case is the term "public interest" meaningful, although some elements in the organization of the liberal social order undermine the cultural norms and values of public life. The cultural aspect is examined in terms of value systems supportive of the public life and of the concept of a middle class, interpreted as a category of political anthropology, embodying its cultural ethos. /// L'article étudie les domaines du privé et du public en termes de culture et d'organisation. Deux stratégies de la structuration sociale s'opposent l'une à l'autre selon qu'on procède du haut vers le bas, ou vice versa. C'est dans ce deuxième cas seulement qu'on peut parler d'intérêt public, même si certains éléments du régime libéral sapent les normes culturelles du domaine public. La notion de classe moyenne apparaît comme une catégorie anthropologique porteuse d'une éthique culturelle spécifique. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0192-5121 1460-373X |
DOI: | 10.1177/019251219101200406 |