Loading…
Status Inconsistency and Role Conflict
Two contemporary versions of the powerful sociological idea that social structure may be inconsistent in the demands it imposes on or the expectations it generates in interacting persons, ie, status inconsistency & role conflict, are explored, with focus on the consequences of such inconsistenci...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annual review of sociology 1978-01, Vol.4 (1), p.57-90 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-7e49ce70be18d5fc1f5f7a938273e75754ff88600f5fc3940f372231f784cbed3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 90 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 57 |
container_title | Annual review of sociology |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Stryker, Sheldon Macke, Anne Statham |
description | Two contemporary versions of the powerful sociological idea that social structure may be inconsistent in the demands it imposes on or the expectations it generates in interacting persons, ie, status inconsistency & role conflict, are explored, with focus on the consequences of such inconsistencies. After reviewing separately the early theory & research connected with status inconsistency & role conflict, the critical reaction to early work, & recent theorizing & research, the relationship of the two concepts is examined & their future explored. Research on status inconsistency & role conflict could each benefit by mutual awareness, & by taking into account principles & findings evolving out of the other research tradition. AA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1146/annurev.so.04.080178.000421 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61099020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2945965</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2945965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-7e49ce70be18d5fc1f5f7a938273e75754ff88600f5fc3940f372231f784cbed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtqwzAQRUVpoWnaP-jCEMjO7owelkxXJfQRCBT6WAtHkcDBkVLJLuTv6-DQRTddDVzOvTCHkBlCgcjLu9r7PtrvIoUCeAEKUKoCADjFMzJBwUVOEcU5mQArIQch6SW5Smk7MCiATsj8vau7PmVLb4JPTeqsN4es9pvsLbQ2WwTv2sZ01-TC1W2yN6c7JZ9Pjx-Ll3z1-rxcPKxyw6Dscml5ZayEtUW1Ec6gE07WFVNUMiuFFNw5pUqAITes4uCYpJShk4qbtd2wKZmPu_sYvnqbOr1rkrFtW3sb-qRLhKoCCv-CTDFGoSoHcPYH3IY--uEJjQyOUxL5QN2PlIkhpWid3sdmV8eDRtBH1fqkWqeggetRtR5VD-3bsb1NXYi_VVpxUZWC_QAeeXx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300203714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Status Inconsistency and Role Conflict</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Annual Reviews</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Stryker, Sheldon ; Macke, Anne Statham</creator><creatorcontrib>Stryker, Sheldon ; Macke, Anne Statham</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Two contemporary versions of the powerful sociological idea that social structure may be inconsistent in the demands it imposes on or the expectations it generates in interacting persons, ie, status inconsistency & role conflict, are explored, with focus on the consequences of such inconsistencies. After reviewing separately the early theory & research connected with status inconsistency & role conflict, the critical reaction to early work, & recent theorizing & research, the relationship of the two concepts is examined & their future explored. Research on status inconsistency & role conflict could each benefit by mutual awareness, & by taking into account principles & findings evolving out of the other research tradition. AA.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-0572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-2115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.04.080178.000421</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARVSDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto, Calif: Annual Reviews Inc</publisher><subject>Conflict/Conflicts ; Crystallization ; Gender roles ; Identity crises ; Inconsistency/Inconsistencies ; Interactionism ; Normativity ; Research methods ; Role conflict ; Role conflicts ; Role/Roles ; Social interaction ; Social structures ; Status ; Status/Statuses ; Working women</subject><ispartof>Annual review of sociology, 1978-01, Vol.4 (1), p.57-90</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1978 Annual Reviews Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-7e49ce70be18d5fc1f5f7a938273e75754ff88600f5fc3940f372231f784cbed3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2945965$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2945965$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4180,27922,27923,33222,33773,58236,58469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stryker, Sheldon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macke, Anne Statham</creatorcontrib><title>Status Inconsistency and Role Conflict</title><title>Annual review of sociology</title><description><![CDATA[Two contemporary versions of the powerful sociological idea that social structure may be inconsistent in the demands it imposes on or the expectations it generates in interacting persons, ie, status inconsistency & role conflict, are explored, with focus on the consequences of such inconsistencies. After reviewing separately the early theory & research connected with status inconsistency & role conflict, the critical reaction to early work, & recent theorizing & research, the relationship of the two concepts is examined & their future explored. Research on status inconsistency & role conflict could each benefit by mutual awareness, & by taking into account principles & findings evolving out of the other research tradition. AA.]]></description><subject>Conflict/Conflicts</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Identity crises</subject><subject>Inconsistency/Inconsistencies</subject><subject>Interactionism</subject><subject>Normativity</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Role conflict</subject><subject>Role conflicts</subject><subject>Role/Roles</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social structures</subject><subject>Status</subject><subject>Status/Statuses</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>0360-0572</issn><issn>1545-2115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1978</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtqwzAQRUVpoWnaP-jCEMjO7owelkxXJfQRCBT6WAtHkcDBkVLJLuTv6-DQRTddDVzOvTCHkBlCgcjLu9r7PtrvIoUCeAEKUKoCADjFMzJBwUVOEcU5mQArIQch6SW5Smk7MCiATsj8vau7PmVLb4JPTeqsN4es9pvsLbQ2WwTv2sZ01-TC1W2yN6c7JZ9Pjx-Ll3z1-rxcPKxyw6Dscml5ZayEtUW1Ec6gE07WFVNUMiuFFNw5pUqAITes4uCYpJShk4qbtd2wKZmPu_sYvnqbOr1rkrFtW3sb-qRLhKoCCv-CTDFGoSoHcPYH3IY--uEJjQyOUxL5QN2PlIkhpWid3sdmV8eDRtBH1fqkWqeggetRtR5VD-3bsb1NXYi_VVpxUZWC_QAeeXx0</recordid><startdate>19780101</startdate><enddate>19780101</enddate><creator>Stryker, Sheldon</creator><creator>Macke, Anne Statham</creator><general>Annual Reviews Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19780101</creationdate><title>Status Inconsistency and Role Conflict</title><author>Stryker, Sheldon ; Macke, Anne Statham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-7e49ce70be18d5fc1f5f7a938273e75754ff88600f5fc3940f372231f784cbed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1978</creationdate><topic>Conflict/Conflicts</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Identity crises</topic><topic>Inconsistency/Inconsistencies</topic><topic>Interactionism</topic><topic>Normativity</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Role conflict</topic><topic>Role conflicts</topic><topic>Role/Roles</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social structures</topic><topic>Status</topic><topic>Status/Statuses</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stryker, Sheldon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macke, Anne Statham</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Annual review of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stryker, Sheldon</au><au>Macke, Anne Statham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Status Inconsistency and Role Conflict</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of sociology</jtitle><date>1978-01-01</date><risdate>1978</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>57-90</pages><issn>0360-0572</issn><eissn>1545-2115</eissn><coden>ARVSDB</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Two contemporary versions of the powerful sociological idea that social structure may be inconsistent in the demands it imposes on or the expectations it generates in interacting persons, ie, status inconsistency & role conflict, are explored, with focus on the consequences of such inconsistencies. After reviewing separately the early theory & research connected with status inconsistency & role conflict, the critical reaction to early work, & recent theorizing & research, the relationship of the two concepts is examined & their future explored. Research on status inconsistency & role conflict could each benefit by mutual awareness, & by taking into account principles & findings evolving out of the other research tradition. AA.]]></abstract><cop>Palo Alto, Calif</cop><pub>Annual Reviews Inc</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev.so.04.080178.000421</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-0572 |
ispartof | Annual review of sociology, 1978-01, Vol.4 (1), p.57-90 |
issn | 0360-0572 1545-2115 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61099020 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Annual Reviews; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Conflict/Conflicts Crystallization Gender roles Identity crises Inconsistency/Inconsistencies Interactionism Normativity Research methods Role conflict Role conflicts Role/Roles Social interaction Social structures Status Status/Statuses Working women |
title | Status Inconsistency and Role Conflict |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A00%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Status%20Inconsistency%20and%20Role%20Conflict&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Stryker,%20Sheldon&rft.date=1978-01-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=57-90&rft.issn=0360-0572&rft.eissn=1545-2115&rft.coden=ARVSDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev.so.04.080178.000421&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2945965%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-7e49ce70be18d5fc1f5f7a938273e75754ff88600f5fc3940f372231f784cbed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300203714&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2945965&rfr_iscdi=true |