Loading…
The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?
During the 1980s the proliferation of new technologies transformed the potential of the news media to provide a constant flow of global real-time news. Tiananmen Square and the collapse of communism symbolised by the fall of the Berlin Wall became major media events communicated to Western audiences...
Saved in:
Published in: | Review of international studies 1999-04, Vol.25 (2), p.301-309 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-4b28e41b0d9b688414f6ed3377c40c45868588478ca71bb30365a5978bc78613 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 309 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 301 |
container_title | Review of international studies |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | ROBINSON, PIERS |
description | During the 1980s the proliferation of new technologies transformed the potential of the news media to provide a constant flow of global real-time news. Tiananmen Square and the collapse of communism symbolised by the fall of the Berlin Wall became major media events communicated to Western audiences instantaneously via TV news media. By the end of the decade the question was being asked as to what extent this ‘media pervasiveness’ had impacted upon government – particularly the process of foreign policy making. The new technologies appeared to reduce the scope for calm deliberation over policy, forcing policy-makers to respond to whatever issue journalists focused on. This perception was in turn reinforced by the end of the bipolar order and what many viewed as the collapse of the old anti-communist consensus which – it was argued – had led to the creation of an ideological bond uniting policy makers and journalists. Released from the ‘prism of the Cold
War’ journalists were, it was presumed, freer not just to cover the stories they wanted but to criticise US foreign policy as well. The phrase ‘CNN effect’ encapsulated the idea that real-time communications technology could provoke major responses from domestic audiences and political elites to global events. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0260210599003010 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61131311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0260210599003010</cupid><jstor_id>20097596</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20097596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-4b28e41b0d9b688414f6ed3377c40c45868588478ca71bb30365a5978bc78613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1LHDEUhoNUcKv9Ab0QBoTizbQn34k3xR3abWFVSvc-ZDIZnXV3Zk1mbf33ZthFRPGDXATO-7yH95yD0GcMXzFg-e0vEAEEA9cagAKGHTTCTOhcA2Mf0GiQ80HfQx9jnAOA4oyNkJpd-aw4P898XXvXn2TOtlmfaq3_F7OlrxqbVaG59VndBd9cttmqWzTu7vsB2q3tIvpP238fzX7-mBW_8unF5HdxOs2dILTPWUmUZ7iESpdCKYZZLXxFqZSOgWNcCcVTWSpnJS5LClRwy7VUpZNKYLqPvmzarkJ3s_axN8smOr9Y2NZ362gExjS9t8G0GE2Z0u8BgYCUb4JUSaJAsgQevwriYSiiMB3QoyfovFuHNi3QYKGoJoRynii8oVzoYgy-NqvQLG24S63McG7z7NzJc7jxzGPfhQcDAdCSa5H0fKM3sff_H3Qbro2QVHIjJn8MHRd6PD0rzLBPus1gl2Voqkv_KOqLKe4BEk6-qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683922355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>ROBINSON, PIERS</creator><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, PIERS</creatorcontrib><description>During the 1980s the proliferation of new technologies transformed the potential of the news media to provide a constant flow of global real-time news. Tiananmen Square and the collapse of communism symbolised by the fall of the Berlin Wall became major media events communicated to Western audiences instantaneously via TV news media. By the end of the decade the question was being asked as to what extent this ‘media pervasiveness’ had impacted upon government – particularly the process of foreign policy making. The new technologies appeared to reduce the scope for calm deliberation over policy, forcing policy-makers to respond to whatever issue journalists focused on. This perception was in turn reinforced by the end of the bipolar order and what many viewed as the collapse of the old anti-communist consensus which – it was argued – had led to the creation of an ideological bond uniting policy makers and journalists. Released from the ‘prism of the Cold
War’ journalists were, it was presumed, freer not just to cover the stories they wanted but to criticise US foreign policy as well. The phrase ‘CNN effect’ encapsulated the idea that real-time communications technology could provoke major responses from domestic audiences and political elites to global events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-2105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0260210599003010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, etc: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Broadcast journalism ; Cable news network ; Civil society ; Civil wars ; Communications technology ; Executive branch ; Foreign news ; Foreign Policy ; Foreign relations ; Government crises ; Humanitarian intervention ; Intervention (international law) ; Journalism ; Mass Media ; Media ; News ; News media ; Political debate ; Political elites ; Public policy ; Review Articles ; Television ; United States</subject><ispartof>Review of international studies, 1999-04, Vol.25 (2), p.301-309</ispartof><rights>1999 British International Studies Association</rights><rights>Copyright 1999 British International Studies Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-4b28e41b0d9b688414f6ed3377c40c45868588478ca71bb30365a5978bc78613</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20097596$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0260210599003010/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27865,27922,27924,27925,33224,33850,58238,58471,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, PIERS</creatorcontrib><title>The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?</title><title>Review of international studies</title><addtitle>Rev. Int. Stud</addtitle><description>During the 1980s the proliferation of new technologies transformed the potential of the news media to provide a constant flow of global real-time news. Tiananmen Square and the collapse of communism symbolised by the fall of the Berlin Wall became major media events communicated to Western audiences instantaneously via TV news media. By the end of the decade the question was being asked as to what extent this ‘media pervasiveness’ had impacted upon government – particularly the process of foreign policy making. The new technologies appeared to reduce the scope for calm deliberation over policy, forcing policy-makers to respond to whatever issue journalists focused on. This perception was in turn reinforced by the end of the bipolar order and what many viewed as the collapse of the old anti-communist consensus which – it was argued – had led to the creation of an ideological bond uniting policy makers and journalists. Released from the ‘prism of the Cold
War’ journalists were, it was presumed, freer not just to cover the stories they wanted but to criticise US foreign policy as well. The phrase ‘CNN effect’ encapsulated the idea that real-time communications technology could provoke major responses from domestic audiences and political elites to global events.</description><subject>Broadcast journalism</subject><subject>Cable news network</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Civil wars</subject><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Executive branch</subject><subject>Foreign news</subject><subject>Foreign Policy</subject><subject>Foreign relations</subject><subject>Government crises</subject><subject>Humanitarian intervention</subject><subject>Intervention (international law)</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>News</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Political elites</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Review Articles</subject><subject>Television</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0260-2105</issn><issn>1469-9044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1LHDEUhoNUcKv9Ab0QBoTizbQn34k3xR3abWFVSvc-ZDIZnXV3Zk1mbf33ZthFRPGDXATO-7yH95yD0GcMXzFg-e0vEAEEA9cagAKGHTTCTOhcA2Mf0GiQ80HfQx9jnAOA4oyNkJpd-aw4P898XXvXn2TOtlmfaq3_F7OlrxqbVaG59VndBd9cttmqWzTu7vsB2q3tIvpP238fzX7-mBW_8unF5HdxOs2dILTPWUmUZ7iESpdCKYZZLXxFqZSOgWNcCcVTWSpnJS5LClRwy7VUpZNKYLqPvmzarkJ3s_axN8smOr9Y2NZ362gExjS9t8G0GE2Z0u8BgYCUb4JUSaJAsgQevwriYSiiMB3QoyfovFuHNi3QYKGoJoRynii8oVzoYgy-NqvQLG24S63McG7z7NzJc7jxzGPfhQcDAdCSa5H0fKM3sff_H3Qbro2QVHIjJn8MHRd6PD0rzLBPus1gl2Voqkv_KOqLKe4BEk6-qw</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>ROBINSON, PIERS</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Butterworths</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>HNUUZ</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?</title><author>ROBINSON, PIERS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-4b28e41b0d9b688414f6ed3377c40c45868588478ca71bb30365a5978bc78613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Broadcast journalism</topic><topic>Cable news network</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Civil wars</topic><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Executive branch</topic><topic>Foreign news</topic><topic>Foreign Policy</topic><topic>Foreign relations</topic><topic>Government crises</topic><topic>Humanitarian intervention</topic><topic>Intervention (international law)</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>News</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Political elites</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Review Articles</topic><topic>Television</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, PIERS</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 21</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Review of international studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROBINSON, PIERS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?</atitle><jtitle>Review of international studies</jtitle><addtitle>Rev. Int. Stud</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>301-309</pages><issn>0260-2105</issn><eissn>1469-9044</eissn><abstract>During the 1980s the proliferation of new technologies transformed the potential of the news media to provide a constant flow of global real-time news. Tiananmen Square and the collapse of communism symbolised by the fall of the Berlin Wall became major media events communicated to Western audiences instantaneously via TV news media. By the end of the decade the question was being asked as to what extent this ‘media pervasiveness’ had impacted upon government – particularly the process of foreign policy making. The new technologies appeared to reduce the scope for calm deliberation over policy, forcing policy-makers to respond to whatever issue journalists focused on. This perception was in turn reinforced by the end of the bipolar order and what many viewed as the collapse of the old anti-communist consensus which – it was argued – had led to the creation of an ideological bond uniting policy makers and journalists. Released from the ‘prism of the Cold
War’ journalists were, it was presumed, freer not just to cover the stories they wanted but to criticise US foreign policy as well. The phrase ‘CNN effect’ encapsulated the idea that real-time communications technology could provoke major responses from domestic audiences and political elites to global events.</abstract><cop>London, etc</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0260210599003010</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0260-2105 |
ispartof | Review of international studies, 1999-04, Vol.25 (2), p.301-309 |
issn | 0260-2105 1469-9044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61131311 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Humanities Index |
subjects | Broadcast journalism Cable news network Civil society Civil wars Communications technology Executive branch Foreign news Foreign Policy Foreign relations Government crises Humanitarian intervention Intervention (international law) Journalism Mass Media Media News News media Political debate Political elites Public policy Review Articles Television United States |
title | The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A29%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20CNN%20effect:%20can%20the%20news%20media%20drive%20foreign%20policy?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20international%20studies&rft.au=ROBINSON,%20PIERS&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=301-309&rft.issn=0260-2105&rft.eissn=1469-9044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0260210599003010&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20097596%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-4b28e41b0d9b688414f6ed3377c40c45868588478ca71bb30365a5978bc78613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683922355&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0260210599003010&rft_jstor_id=20097596&rfr_iscdi=true |