Loading…

The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?

During the 1980s the proliferation of new technologies transformed the potential of the news media to provide a constant flow of global real-time news. Tiananmen Square and the collapse of communism symbolised by the fall of the Berlin Wall became major media events communicated to Western audiences...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of international studies 1999-04, Vol.25 (2), p.301-309
Main Author: ROBINSON, PIERS
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-4b28e41b0d9b688414f6ed3377c40c45868588478ca71bb30365a5978bc78613
cites
container_end_page 309
container_issue 2
container_start_page 301
container_title Review of international studies
container_volume 25
creator ROBINSON, PIERS
description During the 1980s the proliferation of new technologies transformed the potential of the news media to provide a constant flow of global real-time news. Tiananmen Square and the collapse of communism symbolised by the fall of the Berlin Wall became major media events communicated to Western audiences instantaneously via TV news media. By the end of the decade the question was being asked as to what extent this ‘media pervasiveness’ had impacted upon government – particularly the process of foreign policy making. The new technologies appeared to reduce the scope for calm deliberation over policy, forcing policy-makers to respond to whatever issue journalists focused on. This perception was in turn reinforced by the end of the bipolar order and what many viewed as the collapse of the old anti-communist consensus which – it was argued – had led to the creation of an ideological bond uniting policy makers and journalists. Released from the ‘prism of the Cold War’ journalists were, it was presumed, freer not just to cover the stories they wanted but to criticise US foreign policy as well. The phrase ‘CNN effect’ encapsulated the idea that real-time communications technology could provoke major responses from domestic audiences and political elites to global events.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0260210599003010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61131311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0260210599003010</cupid><jstor_id>20097596</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20097596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-4b28e41b0d9b688414f6ed3377c40c45868588478ca71bb30365a5978bc78613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1LHDEUhoNUcKv9Ab0QBoTizbQn34k3xR3abWFVSvc-ZDIZnXV3Zk1mbf33ZthFRPGDXATO-7yH95yD0GcMXzFg-e0vEAEEA9cagAKGHTTCTOhcA2Mf0GiQ80HfQx9jnAOA4oyNkJpd-aw4P898XXvXn2TOtlmfaq3_F7OlrxqbVaG59VndBd9cttmqWzTu7vsB2q3tIvpP238fzX7-mBW_8unF5HdxOs2dILTPWUmUZ7iESpdCKYZZLXxFqZSOgWNcCcVTWSpnJS5LClRwy7VUpZNKYLqPvmzarkJ3s_axN8smOr9Y2NZ362gExjS9t8G0GE2Z0u8BgYCUb4JUSaJAsgQevwriYSiiMB3QoyfovFuHNi3QYKGoJoRynii8oVzoYgy-NqvQLG24S63McG7z7NzJc7jxzGPfhQcDAdCSa5H0fKM3sff_H3Qbro2QVHIjJn8MHRd6PD0rzLBPus1gl2Voqkv_KOqLKe4BEk6-qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683922355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>ROBINSON, PIERS</creator><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, PIERS</creatorcontrib><description>During the 1980s the proliferation of new technologies transformed the potential of the news media to provide a constant flow of global real-time news. Tiananmen Square and the collapse of communism symbolised by the fall of the Berlin Wall became major media events communicated to Western audiences instantaneously via TV news media. By the end of the decade the question was being asked as to what extent this ‘media pervasiveness’ had impacted upon government – particularly the process of foreign policy making. The new technologies appeared to reduce the scope for calm deliberation over policy, forcing policy-makers to respond to whatever issue journalists focused on. This perception was in turn reinforced by the end of the bipolar order and what many viewed as the collapse of the old anti-communist consensus which – it was argued – had led to the creation of an ideological bond uniting policy makers and journalists. Released from the ‘prism of the Cold War’ journalists were, it was presumed, freer not just to cover the stories they wanted but to criticise US foreign policy as well. The phrase ‘CNN effect’ encapsulated the idea that real-time communications technology could provoke major responses from domestic audiences and political elites to global events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-2105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0260210599003010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, etc: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Broadcast journalism ; Cable news network ; Civil society ; Civil wars ; Communications technology ; Executive branch ; Foreign news ; Foreign Policy ; Foreign relations ; Government crises ; Humanitarian intervention ; Intervention (international law) ; Journalism ; Mass Media ; Media ; News ; News media ; Political debate ; Political elites ; Public policy ; Review Articles ; Television ; United States</subject><ispartof>Review of international studies, 1999-04, Vol.25 (2), p.301-309</ispartof><rights>1999 British International Studies Association</rights><rights>Copyright 1999 British International Studies Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-4b28e41b0d9b688414f6ed3377c40c45868588478ca71bb30365a5978bc78613</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20097596$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0260210599003010/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27865,27922,27924,27925,33224,33850,58238,58471,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, PIERS</creatorcontrib><title>The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?</title><title>Review of international studies</title><addtitle>Rev. Int. Stud</addtitle><description>During the 1980s the proliferation of new technologies transformed the potential of the news media to provide a constant flow of global real-time news. Tiananmen Square and the collapse of communism symbolised by the fall of the Berlin Wall became major media events communicated to Western audiences instantaneously via TV news media. By the end of the decade the question was being asked as to what extent this ‘media pervasiveness’ had impacted upon government – particularly the process of foreign policy making. The new technologies appeared to reduce the scope for calm deliberation over policy, forcing policy-makers to respond to whatever issue journalists focused on. This perception was in turn reinforced by the end of the bipolar order and what many viewed as the collapse of the old anti-communist consensus which – it was argued – had led to the creation of an ideological bond uniting policy makers and journalists. Released from the ‘prism of the Cold War’ journalists were, it was presumed, freer not just to cover the stories they wanted but to criticise US foreign policy as well. The phrase ‘CNN effect’ encapsulated the idea that real-time communications technology could provoke major responses from domestic audiences and political elites to global events.</description><subject>Broadcast journalism</subject><subject>Cable news network</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Civil wars</subject><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Executive branch</subject><subject>Foreign news</subject><subject>Foreign Policy</subject><subject>Foreign relations</subject><subject>Government crises</subject><subject>Humanitarian intervention</subject><subject>Intervention (international law)</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Mass Media</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>News</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Political elites</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Review Articles</subject><subject>Television</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0260-2105</issn><issn>1469-9044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1LHDEUhoNUcKv9Ab0QBoTizbQn34k3xR3abWFVSvc-ZDIZnXV3Zk1mbf33ZthFRPGDXATO-7yH95yD0GcMXzFg-e0vEAEEA9cagAKGHTTCTOhcA2Mf0GiQ80HfQx9jnAOA4oyNkJpd-aw4P898XXvXn2TOtlmfaq3_F7OlrxqbVaG59VndBd9cttmqWzTu7vsB2q3tIvpP238fzX7-mBW_8unF5HdxOs2dILTPWUmUZ7iESpdCKYZZLXxFqZSOgWNcCcVTWSpnJS5LClRwy7VUpZNKYLqPvmzarkJ3s_axN8smOr9Y2NZ362gExjS9t8G0GE2Z0u8BgYCUb4JUSaJAsgQevwriYSiiMB3QoyfovFuHNi3QYKGoJoRynii8oVzoYgy-NqvQLG24S63McG7z7NzJc7jxzGPfhQcDAdCSa5H0fKM3sff_H3Qbro2QVHIjJn8MHRd6PD0rzLBPus1gl2Voqkv_KOqLKe4BEk6-qw</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>ROBINSON, PIERS</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Butterworths</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>HNUUZ</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?</title><author>ROBINSON, PIERS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-4b28e41b0d9b688414f6ed3377c40c45868588478ca71bb30365a5978bc78613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Broadcast journalism</topic><topic>Cable news network</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Civil wars</topic><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Executive branch</topic><topic>Foreign news</topic><topic>Foreign Policy</topic><topic>Foreign relations</topic><topic>Government crises</topic><topic>Humanitarian intervention</topic><topic>Intervention (international law)</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Mass Media</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>News</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Political elites</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Review Articles</topic><topic>Television</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, PIERS</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 21</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Review of international studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROBINSON, PIERS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?</atitle><jtitle>Review of international studies</jtitle><addtitle>Rev. Int. Stud</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>301-309</pages><issn>0260-2105</issn><eissn>1469-9044</eissn><abstract>During the 1980s the proliferation of new technologies transformed the potential of the news media to provide a constant flow of global real-time news. Tiananmen Square and the collapse of communism symbolised by the fall of the Berlin Wall became major media events communicated to Western audiences instantaneously via TV news media. By the end of the decade the question was being asked as to what extent this ‘media pervasiveness’ had impacted upon government – particularly the process of foreign policy making. The new technologies appeared to reduce the scope for calm deliberation over policy, forcing policy-makers to respond to whatever issue journalists focused on. This perception was in turn reinforced by the end of the bipolar order and what many viewed as the collapse of the old anti-communist consensus which – it was argued – had led to the creation of an ideological bond uniting policy makers and journalists. Released from the ‘prism of the Cold War’ journalists were, it was presumed, freer not just to cover the stories they wanted but to criticise US foreign policy as well. The phrase ‘CNN effect’ encapsulated the idea that real-time communications technology could provoke major responses from domestic audiences and political elites to global events.</abstract><cop>London, etc</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0260210599003010</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0260-2105
ispartof Review of international studies, 1999-04, Vol.25 (2), p.301-309
issn 0260-2105
1469-9044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_61131311
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Humanities Index
subjects Broadcast journalism
Cable news network
Civil society
Civil wars
Communications technology
Executive branch
Foreign news
Foreign Policy
Foreign relations
Government crises
Humanitarian intervention
Intervention (international law)
Journalism
Mass Media
Media
News
News media
Political debate
Political elites
Public policy
Review Articles
Television
United States
title The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A29%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20CNN%20effect:%20can%20the%20news%20media%20drive%20foreign%20policy?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20international%20studies&rft.au=ROBINSON,%20PIERS&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=301-309&rft.issn=0260-2105&rft.eissn=1469-9044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0260210599003010&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20097596%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c623t-4b28e41b0d9b688414f6ed3377c40c45868588478ca71bb30365a5978bc78613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683922355&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0260210599003010&rft_jstor_id=20097596&rfr_iscdi=true