THE FULTON COMMITTEE AND THE‘PREFERENCE FOR RELEVANCE ISSUE

Early access to the papers of the Fulton committee of 1966‐8, and to the still unpublished oral evidence that the committee received, which has been officially granted to the author, enables the issue of ‘preferences for relevance’ in the directentry recruitment of administrators, which divided the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public administration (London) 1990-06, Vol.68 (2), p.175-190
Main Author: FRY, GEOFFREY K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Great Britain
History
Public administration
Public Administration (Fulton committee)
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Early access to the papers of the Fulton committee of 1966‐8, and to the still unpublished oral evidence that the committee received, which has been officially granted to the author, enables the issue of ‘preferences for relevance’ in the directentry recruitment of administrators, which divided the committee, to be studied fully for the first time. This study is complemented by interviews with the surviving members of the committee and with members of its secretariat. It demonstrates that the evidence and the debate about ‘preference for relevance’ had a different balance from that which the previously published material suggested. The bulk of the evidence was anti‐pathetic to ‘preference for relevance’ with many ministers being among the conservatives. The majority of the committee was radical but a substantial minority favoured ‘traditional’ arraqgements with professionalized post‐entry training. Ironically, what eventually emerged was traditionalism without substantial training which nobody on the committee, and only a small number of those giving evidence, favoured.
ISSN:0033-3298
1467-9299
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1990.tb00753.x