Unearthing the Denominator in Regulatory Taking Claims

The Supreme Court has held that any regulation that denies a property owner all economically beneficial or productive uses of land amounts to a taking under the Fifth Amendment. However, the Court neglected to address the issue of takings when more than one tract of land is affected, but only one is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The University of Chicago law review 1994-10, Vol.61 (4), p.1535-1563
Main Author: Fee, John E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Claims
Coal
Comments
Commercial regulation
Constitutional law
Economic impact
Economic regulation
Economic value
Eminent domain
Federal court decisions
Land economics
Land ownership
Land use
Law
Property ownership
Property rights
Real estate
Regulation
Settlements & damages
State court decisions
Supreme Court decisions
United States
Viability
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Supreme Court has held that any regulation that denies a property owner all economically beneficial or productive uses of land amounts to a taking under the Fifth Amendment. However, the Court neglected to address the issue of takings when more than one tract of land is affected, but only one is affected adversely by regulation.
ISSN:0041-9494
1939-859X
DOI:10.2307/1600125