Loading…

A meta-analysis of life course variation in drinking

Meta‐analysis combines remits from multiple longitudinal studies to describe life course variation by age and sex for quantity of drinking per typical occasion (20 studies) and frequency of drinking during one month (27 studies). There is cross‐study heterogeneity for the Time 1 means of the drinkin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British Journal of Addiction 1991-10, Vol.86 (10), p.1221-1268
Main Authors: FILLMORE, KAYE MIDDLETON, HARTKA, ELIZABETH, JOHNSTONE, BRYAN M., LEINO, E. VICTOR, MOTOYOSHI, MICHELLE, TEMPLE, MARK T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Meta‐analysis combines remits from multiple longitudinal studies to describe life course variation by age and sex for quantity of drinking per typical occasion (20 studies) and frequency of drinking during one month (27 studies). There is cross‐study heterogeneity for the Time 1 means of the drinking variables blocking for age and sex. Age distributions for the Time I means are similar by gender within nations; in the aggregate, males exceed females in the magnitude of drinking. Dramatic shifts in the standarized mean difference (M2 ‐ M1) occur among the young; greater homogeneity and moderate change (declines) occur later in life. Implicated in improving cross‐study homogeneity for M 2– M1 among the young are interval between measurements, nation, Time 1 per capita consumption (PCC), difference in PCC and the Time 1 mean. Lower unstandardized regression coefficients are found for quantity among youth, but are not consistently homogeneous within nations; the association for frequency becomes increasingly stable with increasing age. Nation and interval are implicated in improving homogeneity. Decline in quantity occurs among the old. M2‐M1, produces homogeneously higher regressions for groups of the young who increase quantity v. those who do not. Linkage of the group‐level and individual‐level findings is discussed.
ISSN:0952-0481
0965-2140
2056-5178
DOI:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01702.x